Using PEQUAL Methodology in Auction Platforms Evaluation Process

Together with the growth of e-commerce sector, companies are focusing more and more attention on website quality evaluations. Evolution along with an ever-growing set of available methods are being observed for online shopping platforms, as well as auctions, and it is creating better representations of various characteristics and parameters. The following article presents a usability study of auction websites based on the PEQUAL methodology. The used method is based on the extended version of classical EQUAL method with taken into account different aspects of preference modelling and aggregation derived from Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Presented empirical verification has been conducted out for top auction websites and results show significant practical possibilities of analysis of obtained results.

[1]  Gisela M. von Dran,et al.  User Expectations and Rankings of Quality Factors in Different Web Site Domains , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[2]  Mei Cao,et al.  B2C e-commerce web site quality: an empirical examination , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[3]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Factors influencing online auction repurchase intention , 2008, Internet Res..

[4]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Effects of e‐service quality on loyalty intention: an empirical study in online auction , 2008 .

[5]  Aïda Valls,et al.  ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Feng Kong,et al.  International Journal of C 2005 Institute for Scientific Information and Systems Sciences Computing and Information Applying Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Evaluate Success Factors of E-commerce , 2022 .

[7]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Anup K. Ghosh E-Commerce Security and Privacy , 2001, Advances in Information Security.

[9]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  Integration of domain ontologies in the repository of website evaluation methods , 2015, 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[10]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  PEQUAL - E-commerce websites quality evaluation methodology , 2016, 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[11]  Hung-Pin Shih,et al.  Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[13]  Linda A. Webb,et al.  Business to Consumer Electronic Commerce Website Quality: Integrating Information and Service Dimensions , 2001 .

[14]  Lina Zhou,et al.  User preferences discovery using fuzzy models , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Glenn Robert Bewsell Distrust, Fear and Emotional Learning: An Online Auction Perspective , 2012, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[16]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[18]  Alex Koohang,et al.  E-Learning Courseware Usability: Building a Theoretical Model , 2016, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls , 2004, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[20]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Beyond the Usability Lab: Conducting Large-scale Online User Experience Studies , 2009 .

[21]  Zheng Zhou,et al.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Murali Sambasivan,et al.  A respecification and extension of DeLone and McLean model of IS success in the citizen-centric e-governance , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[23]  Mateusz Piwowarski,et al.  Method of Criteria Selection and Weights Calculation in the Process of Web Projects Evaluation , 2014, ICCCI.

[24]  A. Elvan Bayraktaroglu,et al.  The relative importance of usability and functionality factors for online auction and shopping web sites , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[25]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  An Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation of MCDA Methods , 2016, ACIIDS.

[26]  Kostas Kolomvatsos,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling of User Behaviors and Virtual Goods Purchases in Social Networking Platforms , 2016, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[27]  Da Ruan,et al.  A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites: Research Articles , 2006 .

[28]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[30]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[32]  D. Belanche,et al.  Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk , 2012 .

[33]  Steven Walczak,et al.  The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res..

[34]  Ewa Ziemba,et al.  A MODEL OF SUCCESS FACTORS FOR E-GOVERNMENT ADOPTION - THE CASE OF POLAND , 2013 .

[35]  Anne Morris,et al.  Using Google Analytics to Evaluate the Usability of E-Commerce Sites , 2009, HCI.

[36]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  Da Ruan,et al.  A fuzzy preference‐ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites , 2006, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[38]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Online learning in online auctions , 2003, SODA '03.

[39]  Jeffrey Rubin,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests , 1994 .

[40]  Mateusz Piwowarski,et al.  Web Projects Evaluation Using the Method of Significant Website Assessment Criteria Detection , 2016, Trans. Comput. Collect. Intell..

[41]  Daniel W. Manchala E-Commerce Trust Metrics and Models , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[42]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[43]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[44]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences , 2002 .

[46]  Silvia Mara Abrahão,et al.  Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[47]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Green Energy for a Green City—A Multi-Perspective Model Approach , 2016 .

[48]  Harry J. Paarsch,et al.  An Introduction to the Structural Econometrics of Auction Data , 2006 .

[49]  Leo Lentz,et al.  Website Evaluation Questionnaire: Development of a Research-Based Tool for Evaluating Informational Websites , 2007, EGOV.

[50]  J. Brans,et al.  The Promethee Methods for MCDM; The Promcalc, Gaia And Bankadviser Software , 1990 .

[51]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Assessing the quality of auction Web sites , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  Marek Zborowski,et al.  Comparative analysis of electronic banking websites in selected banks in Poland in 2014 , 2015, 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[53]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[55]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[56]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[57]  Roberta Ann Barra,et al.  International issues of the design and usage of websites for e-commerce: Hotel and airline examples , 2008 .

[58]  Steve Muylle,et al.  The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Jinghua Huang,et al.  An e-commerce performance assessment model: Its development and an initial test on e-commerce applications in the retail sector of China , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Przemyslaw Kazienko,et al.  Towards the Tradeoff Between Online Marketing Resources Exploitation and the User Experience with the Use of Eye Tracking , 2016, ACIIDS.

[61]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  Construction and Restructuring of the Knowledge Repository of Website Evaluation Methods , 2015, ISM/AITM.

[62]  Xiaoyuan Wu,et al.  Predicting the conversion probability for items on C2C ecommerce sites , 2009, CIKM.

[63]  Tolga Kaya,et al.  Multi-attribute Evaluation of Website Quality in E-business Using an Integrated Fuzzy AHPTOPSIS Methodology , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[64]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Measuring Web site quality improvements: a case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[65]  Przemyslaw Kazienko,et al.  Fuzzy multi-objective modeling of effectiveness and user experience in online advertising , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..