Teaching cell biology to nonscience majors through forensics, or how to design a killer course.

Nonscience majors often do not respond to traditional lecture-only biology courses. However, these students still need exposure to basic biological concepts. To accomplish this goal, forensic science was paired with compatible cell biology subjects. Several topics such as human development and molecular biology were found to fulfill this purpose. Another goal was to maximize the hands-on experience of the nonscience major students. This objective was fulfilled by specific activities such as fingerprinting and DNA typing. One particularly effective teaching tool was a mock murder mystery complete with a Grand Jury trial. Another objective was to improve students' attitudes toward science. This was successful in that students felt more confident in their own scientific abilities after taking the course. In pre/post tests, students answered four questions about their ability to conduct science. All four statements showed a positive shift after the course (p values ranging from.001 to.036, df = 23; n = 24). The emphasis on experiential pedagogy was also shown to increase critical thinking skills. In pre/post testing, students in this course significantly increased their performance on critical thinking assessment tests from 33.3% correct to 45.3% (p =.008, df = 4; n = 24).

[1]  Kaladhar Voruganti,et al.  Volume I , 2005, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 2005..

[2]  R. Wright,et al.  Learning cell biology as a team: a project-based approach to upper-division cell biology. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[3]  Brandon J. Cruickshank,et al.  Can Problem-based Instruction Stimulate Higher Order Thinking? Converting an Instrument Analysis Lab. , 2002 .

[4]  S. Debburman,et al.  Learning how scientists work: experiential research projects to promote cell biology learning and scientific process skills. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[5]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[6]  Cheryl L. Mason,et al.  Exercise in Inquiry: Critical Thinking in an Inquiry-Based Exercise Physiology Laboratory Course. , 2003 .

[7]  Richard Saferstein,et al.  Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science , 1977 .

[8]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: cooperative learning in the science classroom--beyond students working in groups. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[9]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[10]  Anton E. Lawson.  An Inquiry Approach to Nonmajors Biology. , 1990 .

[11]  M. F. Fass.  Teaching Emerging Diseases: A Strategy for Succeeding with Nonmajors , 2000, Microbiology education.

[12]  D. French,et al.  Factors Affecting Participation in Traditional and Inquiry-based Laboratories. , 2002 .

[13]  D. French,et al.  A statistical examination of student achievement and attitude in a large-enrollment, inquiry-based, introductory, biology course. , 2001 .