Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review

[1]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Health workers’ values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review , 2022, Contraception.

[2]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Contraception values and preferences of people living with HIV: a systematic review. , 2021, Contraception.

[3]  A. Burke,et al.  Contraceptive values and preferences of pregnant women, postpartum women, women seeking emergency contraceptives, and women seeking abortion services: a systematic review. , 2021, Contraception.

[4]  A. Lavelanet,et al.  A systematic review exploring the contraception values and preferences of sex workers, transmasculine individuals, people who inject drugs, and those living in humanitarian contexts , 2021, Contraception.

[5]  K. Soin,et al.  Contraceptive values and preferences of adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. , 2021, Contraception.

[6]  J. Kiarie,et al.  Setting global standards: The paramount importance of considering contraceptive values and preferences of clients and providers , 2021, Contraception.

[7]  J. Obedin-Maliver,et al.  Contraceptive counseling for transgender and gender diverse people who were female sex assigned at birth. , 2020, Contraception.

[8]  G. Badger,et al.  Perceptions of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Women Receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder in Vermont. , 2020, Contraception.

[9]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Contraception values and preferences: protocol and methods for a global systematic review. , 2020, Contraception.

[10]  T. Madden,et al.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  D. Constant,et al.  A multidimensional approach to inform family planning needs, preferences and behaviours amongst women in South Africa through body mapping , 2019, Reproductive Health.

[12]  B. Adamou,et al.  Exploring gaps in monitoring and evaluation of male engagement in family planning , 2019, Gates open research.

[13]  J. Denison,et al.  The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[14]  Beth Sundstrom,et al.  The myth of menstruation: how menstrual regulation and suppression impact contraceptive choice , 2019, BMC Women's Health.

[15]  Kristin E. Yarris,et al.  Gender, inequality and Depo-Provera: Constraints on reproductive choice in Nicaragua , 2017, Global public health.

[16]  Sarah E. Timmons,et al.  Integrating Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Services into New York City School-Based Health Centers: Quality Improvement to Ensure Provision of Youth-Friendly Services. , 2016, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[17]  Beth Sundstrom,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Young Women's Beliefs About Intrauterine Devices: Fear of Infertility. , 2016, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[18]  A. Gomez,et al.  “Is That A Method of Birth Control?” A Qualitative Exploration of Young Women’s Use of Withdrawal , 2016, Journal of sex research.

[19]  J. Higgins,et al.  The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept , 2016, Journal of sex research.

[20]  J. Lucke,et al.  A qualitative analysis of women's explanations for changing contraception: the importance of non-contraceptive effects , 2016, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[21]  J. Kiarie,et al.  The WHO's medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: 20 years of global guidance , 2015, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[22]  C. Woodsong,et al.  Acceptability and preferences for vaginal dosage forms intended for prevention of HIV or HIV and pregnancy. , 2015, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[23]  S. Dessole,et al.  Observational, prospective, multicentre study to evaluate the effects of counselling on the choice of combined hormonal contraceptives in Italy—the ECOS (Educational COunselling effectS) study , 2015, BMC Women's Health.

[24]  J. Peipert,et al.  The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  A. Mccarthy,et al.  Knowledge and Use of Emergency Contraception in College Women , 2015, Western journal of nursing research.

[26]  R. Singh,et al.  Addressing unmet need and religious barrier towards the use of family planning method among Muslim women in India , 2015 .

[27]  J. Peipert,et al.  Contraceptive continuation in Hispanic women. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  C. Dehlendorf,et al.  Provider counseling to young women seeking family planning services. , 2014, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[29]  D. Mansour.  International survey to assess women’s attitudes regarding choice of daily versus nondaily female hormonal contraception , 2014, International journal of women's health.

[30]  J. Bitzer,et al.  Factors influencing women's selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: Results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study , 2013, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[31]  K. Grumbach,et al.  Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. , 2013, Contraception.

[32]  S. Weyers,et al.  Women’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling , 2013, BMC Women's Health.

[33]  D. Mishell,et al.  The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing®, a decade after its introduction , 2012, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[34]  C. Grimm,et al.  Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: results of the CHOICE study in Austria. , 2012, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[35]  G. Merki-Feld,et al.  Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and decision after counselling in Switzerland – Swiss data from the European CHOICE study , 2012, European journal of contraception & reproductive health care.

[36]  Hatem Abu Hashim,et al.  Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial with norethisterone. , 2012, Contraception.

[37]  J. Bitzer,et al.  The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries , 2012, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[38]  L. Vicente,et al.  Impact of a women's counselling programme on combined hormonal contraception in Portugal – The IMAGINE Study , 2011, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[39]  S. Weyers,et al.  Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? , 2011, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[40]  J. Simon,et al.  Current issues and available options in combined hormonal contraception. , 2011, Contraception.

[41]  K. Gemzell‐Danielsson,et al.  Comprehensive counseling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: results of the CHOICE program in Sweden , 2011, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[42]  T. Fait.  Combined hormone contraceptive choice experience in Czech Republic , 2011 .

[43]  T. Fait.  [Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women]. , 2011, Ceska gynekologie.

[44]  J. Peipert,et al.  Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  N. Kasparian,et al.  Women's knowledge, beliefs, and information needs in relation to the risks and benefits associated with use of the oral contraceptive pill. , 2011, Journal of women's health.

[46]  T. Fait,et al.  [Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraception's choice--results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic]. , 2011, Ceska gynekologie.

[47]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  Acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring among adolescent women. , 2010, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[48]  M. Simon,et al.  The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women. , 2010, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[49]  A. Aisien,et al.  Safety, efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital. , 2010, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[50]  S. Rubin,et al.  Urban female family medicine patients' perceptions about intrauterine contraception. , 2010, Journal of women's health.

[51]  David J Hooper.  Attitudes, Awareness, Compliance and Preferences among Hormonal Contraception Users , 2010, Clinical drug investigation.

[52]  R. Bell,et al.  Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users. , 2009, Contraception.

[53]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  G. Gray,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of Decisions Affecting Contraceptive Utilization and Fertility Intentions among HIV-Positive Women in Soweto, South Africa , 2009, AIDS and Behavior.

[55]  M. Paçarada,et al.  Analysis of contraception using IUDs in Kosova. , 2009, Medicinski arhiv.

[56]  Lisa M. Johnson,et al.  Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. , 2008, Contraception.

[57]  T. Raine,et al.  Adolescent experiences with the vaginal ring. , 2008, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[58]  C. Fortney,et al.  Army women's reasons for condom use and nonuse. , 2008, Women's health issues.

[59]  L. Barclay,et al.  None of Them Were Satisfactory: Women's Experiences with Contraception , 2006, Health care for women international.

[60]  Sue Wilson,et al.  What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study , 2006, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.