Performance variation of morphed face image detection algorithms across different datasets

In past years, different researchers have shown the vulnerability of face recognition systems to attacks based on morphed face images. More recently, first morph detection subsystems have been proposed to automatically detect this kind of fraud. While some algorithms have been reported to reveal practical detection performance on individual datasets a systematic analysis of proposed detectors with respect to their robustness across different databases has remained elusive. In this work, we evaluate the performance of different morph detection algorithms across disjoint datasets of 2,745 bona fide and 14,337 automatically generated morphed face images. Within a generic evaluation framework a systematic robustness estimation scheme is proposed to identify reliable detection algorithms. Finally, the robustness of algorithms which have been determined as most promising is verified on another disjoint dataset. Hence, this paper represents the first attempt towards a comprehensive cross-database performance evaluation and a systematic evaluation of the robustness of morphed face image detection algorithms.

[1]  Shengcai Liao,et al.  Learning Multi-scale Block Local Binary Patterns for Face Recognition , 2007, ICB.

[2]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  The magic passport , 2014, IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics.

[3]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  On the Effects of Image Alterations on Face Recognition Accuracy , 2016, Face Recognition Across the Imaging Spectrum.

[4]  Davis E. King,et al.  Dlib-ml: A Machine Learning Toolkit , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Kiran B. Raja,et al.  Transferable Deep-CNN Features for Detecting Digital and Print-Scanned Morphed Face Images , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW).

[6]  Anna Hilsmann,et al.  Detection of Face Morphing Attacks by Deep Learning , 2017, IWDW.

[7]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Modeling Attacks on Photo-ID Documents and Applying Media Forensics for the Detection of Facial Morphing , 2017, IH&MMSec.

[8]  Christoph Busch,et al.  Predicting the vulnerability of biometric systems to attacks based on morphed biometric information , 2018, IET Biom..

[9]  Kiran B. Raja,et al.  On the vulnerability of face recognition systems towards morphed face attacks , 2017, 2017 5th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF).

[10]  Christoph Busch,et al.  Towards Detection of Morphed Face Images in Electronic Travel Documents , 2018, 2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS).

[11]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Biometric Systems under Morphing Attacks: Assessment of Morphing Techniques and Vulnerability Reporting , 2017, 2017 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[12]  Davide Maltoni,et al.  Face Demorphing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[13]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[14]  Christoph Busch,et al.  Is your biometric system robust to morphing attaeks? , 2017, 2017 5th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF).

[15]  Chi Fang,et al.  Histogram of the oriented gradient for face recognition , 2011 .

[16]  Esa Rahtu,et al.  BSIF: Binarized statistical image features , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[17]  Jana Dittmann,et al.  Benchmarking face morphing forgery detection: Application of stirtrace for impact simulation of different processing steps , 2017, 2017 5th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF).

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[19]  Christoph Busch,et al.  Morph Deterction from Single Face Image: a Multi-Algorithm Fusion Approach , 2018, ICBEA '18.