Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamiltonian formulation and conserving numerical integration

In the present paper unit quaternions are used to describe the rotational motion of a rigid body. The unit-length constraint is enforced explicitly by means of an algebraic constraint. Correspondingly, the equations of motion assume the form of differential-algebraic equations (DAEs). A new route to the derivation of the mass matrix associated with the quaternion formulation is presented. In contrast to previous works, the newly proposed approach yields a non-singular mass matrix. Consequently, the passage to the Hamiltonian framework is made possible without the need to introduce undetermined inertia terms. The Hamiltonian form of the DAEs along with the notion of a discrete derivative make possible the design of a new quaternion-based energy―momentum scheme. Two numerical examples demonstrate the performance of the newly developed method. In this connection, comparison is made with a quaternion-based variational integrator, a director-based energy―momentum scheme, and a momentum conserving scheme relying on the discretization of the classical Euler's equations.

[1]  A. Hamdouni,et al.  The equations of motion of a rigid body without parametrization of rotations , 1999 .

[2]  Peter Betsch,et al.  The discrete null space method for the energy consistent integration of constrained mechanical systems: Part I: Holonomic constraints , 2005 .

[3]  Alberto Cardona,et al.  Energy Preserving Time Integration for Constrained Multibody Systems , 2004 .

[4]  O. Gonzalez Time integration and discrete Hamiltonian systems , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Betsch,et al.  The discrete null space method for the energy consistent integration of constrained mechanical systems. Part II: multibody dynamics , 2006 .

[6]  Peter C. Varadi,et al.  Hoberman's Sphere, Euler Parameters and Lagrange's Equations , 1999 .

[7]  M. Borri,et al.  The Embedded Projection Method : A general index reduction procedure for constrained system dynamics , 2006 .

[8]  Antonio Elipe,et al.  Quaternions and the rotation of a rigid body , 2006 .

[9]  J. Marsden,et al.  Variational integrators for constrained dynamical systems , 2008 .

[10]  Petr Krysl Explicit momentum‐conserving integrator for dynamics of rigid bodies approximating the midpoint Lie algorithm , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Constrained integration of rigid body dynamics , 2001 .

[12]  O. Gonzalez Mechanical systems subject to holonomic constraints: differential—algebraic formulations and conservative integration , 1999 .

[13]  J.C.K. Chou,et al.  Quaternion kinematic and dynamic differential equations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Hamiltonian formalism for Euler parameters , 1985 .

[15]  J. Marsden,et al.  Mechanical integrators derived from a discrete variational principle , 1997 .

[16]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the stability of symplectic and energy-momentum algorithms for non-linear Hamiltonian systems with symmetry , 1996 .

[17]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  Formulation and performance of variational integrators for rotating bodies , 2008 .

[18]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Conservation properties of a time FE method—part III: Mechanical systems with holonomic constraints , 2002 .

[19]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Unconditionally stable algorithms for rigid body dynamics that exactly preserve energy and momentum , 1991 .

[20]  H. S. Morton,et al.  Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of rigid-body rotational dynamics based on the Euler parameters , 1993 .