Crustal Deformation and Fractals, a Review

The frequency—magnitude statistics of earthquakes have long been known to satisfy the Gutenberg—Richter relation; it is easy to show that this relation is fractal with D=1.8–2. Since it is generally accepted that individual faults have characteristic earthquakes, it follows that the number—size statistics of faults are also fractal. Limited field studies indicate that the surface exposures have a two—dimensional fractal dimension of D ~ 1.6. (The seismic and fault fractal dimensions need not be equal since the repeat time of earthquakes can also have a power—law dependence on scale.) Fragments have a fractal number—size relation with D ~ 2.5 under a wide range of conditions. One model for tectonic deformation is comminution; such a scale—invariant model appears to be consistent with the fractal correlations discussed above. Seismicity has many of the characteristic features of “self—organized criticality”. Energy (strain) is continuously added to the crust and is lost in discrete events (earthquakes) that have a fractal frequency—size distribution. It appears reasonable to hypothesize that the continental crust is everywhere in this critical state (similar to the critical stress associated with perfect plasticity). Evidence for this comes from the distribution of intraplate earthquake and from the occurrence of induced seismicity almost anywhere an artificial reservoir is filled.

[1]  C. Baag,et al.  Seismicity parameters preceding moderate to major earthquakes , 1981 .

[2]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Are earthquakes an example of deterministic chaos , 1990 .

[3]  J. Evernden,et al.  Study of regional seismicity and associated problems , 1970, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Keisuke Ito,et al.  Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena , 1990 .

[5]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 3. Thermodynamical approach and its relation to nonclassical theories of nucleation , 1989 .

[6]  Nakanishi,et al.  Cellular-automaton model of earthquakes with deterministic dynamics. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[7]  Jie Huang,et al.  Chaotic seismic faulting with a mass-spring model and velocity-weakening friction , 1992 .

[8]  W. Gosnold Heat flow in the Great Plains of the United States , 1990 .

[9]  Robert H. Osborne,et al.  Self-similar cataclasis in the formation of fault gouge , 1986 .

[10]  Tang,et al.  Rupture propagation in a model of an earthquake fault. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[11]  Sidney R. Nagel,et al.  Instabilities in a sandpile , 1992 .

[12]  H. Takayasu,et al.  Fractal features of the earthquake phenomenon and a simple mechanical model , 1991 .

[13]  C. H. Scholz,et al.  Earthquakes and Faulting: Self-Organized Critical Phenomena with a Characteristic Dimension , 1991 .

[14]  J. Rundle A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[15]  Vladimir I. Keilis-borok,et al.  Diagnosis of time of increased probability of strong earthquakes in different regions of the world , 1990 .

[16]  G. M. Molchan,et al.  Statistical analysis of the results of earthquake prediction, based on bursts of aftershocks , 1990 .

[17]  A cellular-automata, slider-block model for earthquakes I. Demonstration of chaotic behaviour for a low-order system , 1992 .

[18]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality and Earthquakes , 1989 .

[19]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Model and theoretical seismicity , 1967 .

[20]  P. Bak,et al.  Earthquakes as a self‐organized critical phenomenon , 1989 .

[21]  Johansson,et al.  Electronic structure of the Na-adsorbed Si(100)2 x 1 surface studied by inverse and direct angle-resolved photoemission. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[22]  C. Scholz Mechanisms of seismic quiescences , 1988 .

[23]  Rosendahl,et al.  Persistent self-organization of sandpiles. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  Wu,et al.  Scaling and universality in avalanches. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[25]  D. Turcotte,et al.  A cellular-automata, slider-block model for earthquakes II. Demonstration of self-organized criticality for a 2-D system , 1992 .

[26]  D. Sornette,et al.  Structuration of the lithosphere in plate tectonics as a self‐organized critical phenomenon , 1990 .

[27]  Javier F. Pacheco,et al.  Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes , 1992, Nature.

[28]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  Some characteristics of foreshocks and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction , 1979 .

[29]  Carlson,et al.  Mechanical model of an earthquake fault. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[30]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Seismic activity on neighbouring faults as a long-term precursor to large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area , 1990, Nature.

[31]  D. L. Turcotte,et al.  A fractal approach to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment , 1989 .

[32]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8 , 1990 .

[33]  S. Schreider Formal definition of premonitory seismic quiescence , 1990 .

[34]  Proton-proton elastic spin observables at large t. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[35]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Origin of rate dependence in frictional sliding , 1991 .

[36]  P. Bak,et al.  Self-organized criticality. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[37]  Nakanishi Statistical properties of the cellular-automaton model for earthquakes. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[38]  A scale‐invariant cellular‐automata model for distribited seismicity , 1991 .

[39]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A simplified spring-block model of earthquakes , 1991 .

[40]  Bruce E. Shaw,et al.  Patterns of seismic activity preceding large earthquakes , 1992 .

[41]  V. I. Keilis-Borok,et al.  The lithosphere of the Earth as a nonlinear system with implications for earthquake prediction , 1990 .

[42]  Arch C. Johnston,et al.  Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 1985 .

[43]  D. Sornette,et al.  Earthquake rupture as a critical point: consequences for telluric precursors , 1990 .

[44]  D. C. Sherrington,et al.  Spontaneous formation of space-time structures and criticality , 1991 .

[45]  John B. Rundle,et al.  A physical model for earthquakes: 1. Fluctuations and interactions , 1988 .

[46]  Carlson,et al.  Self-organizing systems at finite driving rates. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[47]  D. L. Turcotte,et al.  Evidence for chaotic fault interactions in the seismicity of the San Andreas fault and Nankai trough , 1990, Nature.

[48]  H. Takayasu,et al.  Dynamical phase transition in threshold elements , 1988 .

[49]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Fractals and fragmentation , 1986 .

[50]  J. Carlson,et al.  Time intervals between characteristic earthquakes and correlations with smaller events: An analysis based on a mechanical model of a fault , 1991 .

[51]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Uniform Flood-Frequency Estimating Methods for Federal Agencies , 1968 .

[52]  Shaw,et al.  Intrinsic properties of a Burridge-Knopoff model of an earthquake fault. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[53]  Carlson Jm Two-dimensional model of a fault , 1991 .

[54]  R. E. Habermann,et al.  Precursory seismic quiescence , 1988 .

[55]  Vladimir Kossobokov,et al.  Times of increased probability of strong earthquakes (M ≥ 7.5) diagnosed by Algorithm M8 in Japan and adjacent territories , 1990 .