Some Characteristics Are Risk Exposures, and the Rest Are Irrelevant

We use a new method to estimate common risk factors and loadings in the cross section of asset returns. The method, Instrumented Principal Components Analysis (IPCA), allows for time-varying loadings in a latent factor return model by introducing observable characteristics that instrument for the unobservable dynamic loadings. If the characteristics’expected return relationship is driven by compensation for exposure to latent risk factors, IPCA will identify the corresponding latent factors. If no such factors exist, IPCA infers that the characteristic effect is compensation without risk and allocates it to an “anomaly” intercept. Studying returns and characteristics at the stock-level, we find that three IPCA factors explain the cross section of average returns significantly more accurately than existing factor models and produce characteristic-associated anomaly intercepts that are small and statistically insignificant. Furthermore, among a large collection of characteristics explored in the literature, only seven are statistically significant in the IPCA specification and are responsible for nearly 100% of the model’s accuracy. ∗We thank Svetlana Bryzgalova (discussant), John Cochrane, Stefano Giglio, Lars Hansen, Serhiy Kozak, Toby Moskowitz, Andreas Neuhierl, Dacheng Xiu and audience participants at AQR, ASU, Chicago, Duke, Minnesota, SoFiE, and the St. Louis Federal Reserve for helpful comments. We are grateful to Andreas Neuhierl for generously sharing data with us. Corresponding author contact information: bryan.kelly@chicagobooth.edu, (773) 702-8359.

[1]  Barr Rosenberg,et al.  Extra-Market Components of Covariance in Security Returns , 1974, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[2]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets , 1983 .

[3]  Oleg Rytchkov,et al.  Aggregation of Information About the Cross Section of Stock Returns: A Latent Variable Approach , 2017 .

[4]  J. Lewellen The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns , 2014 .

[5]  B. Kelly,et al.  Instrumented Principal Component Analysis , 2017 .

[6]  Stefan Nagel,et al.  A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset-Pricing Tests , 2006 .

[7]  S. Ross The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing , 1976 .

[8]  Tarun Chordia,et al.  Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing with Individual Stocks: Betas versus Characteristics , 2015 .

[9]  Richard Roll,et al.  A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory''s Tests: Part I , 1977 .

[10]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  Testing Factor-Model Explanations of Market Anomalies , 2012 .

[11]  Bailey,et al.  Asset Pricing , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[12]  Lars Peter Hansen,et al.  THE ROLE OF CONDITIONING INFORMATION IN DEDUCING TESTABLE RESTRICTIONS IMPLIED BY DYNAMIC ASSET PRICING MODELS1 , 1987 .

[13]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets , 1982 .

[14]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  PROJECTED PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS IN FACTOR MODELS. , 2014, Annals of statistics.

[15]  Lutz Kilian,et al.  Bootstrapping Autoregressions with Conditional Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EVIDENCE ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CROSS SECTIONAL VARIATION IN STOCK RETURNS , 1996 .

[17]  Serhiy Kozak,et al.  Shrinking the Cross Section , 2017, Journal of Financial Economics.

[18]  Amit Goyal,et al.  Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey , 2012 .

[19]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[20]  Michael Weber,et al.  Dissecting Characteristics Nonparametrically , 2017 .

[21]  J. Stock,et al.  Forecasting Using Principal Components From a Large Number of Predictors , 2002 .

[22]  E. Fama,et al.  A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model , 2014 .

[23]  Gregory Connor,et al.  An Intertemporal Equilibrium Beta Pricing Model , 1989 .

[24]  Gregory Connor,et al.  Risk and Return in an Equilibrium Apt: Application of a New Test Methodology , 1988 .

[25]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Variation of Economic Risk Premiums , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Stephen A. Ross,et al.  A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio , 1989 .

[27]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Mark M. Carhart On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[29]  Gregory Connor,et al.  A Test for the Number of Factors in an Approximate Factor Model , 1993 .