Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11

With increasing media choice and diverse media outlets, people have more opportunities to engage in selective exposure. The present study investigates this phenomenon by looking at the widely viewed anti–President George W. Bush documentary Fahrenheit 9/11. Using survey data gathered from a national sample before and after the opening of Fahrenheit 9/11, this study investigates the degree of selective exposure and the potential media effects occurring as a result of exposure to the film. The data provide evidence that selective exposure occurred—the audience for the film held more negative attitudes toward President George W. Bush. This study then turns to evaluating whether the film had political effects. Results suggest that those who viewed the film had significantly more negative attitudes toward Bush compared to those who intended to view the film, even after controlling for demographic, political, and media use differences between the groups. Results also suggest that political discussion with frien...

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Capturing campaign dynamics, 2000 and 2004 : the national Annenberg election survey , 2006 .

[3]  G. Stempel.  SELECTIVITY IN READERSHIP OF POLITICAL NEWS , 1961 .

[4]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton , 1997 .

[5]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .

[6]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[7]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Individual vs. Social Predictors of Information Seeking , 1973 .

[8]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. , 2003 .

[9]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[10]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[11]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[12]  I. Guttman,et al.  Postdecision exposure to relevant information. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Giving Advice or Making Decisions in Someone Else’s Place: The Influence of Impression, Defense, and Accuracy Motivation on the Search for New Information , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  M. Rokeach,et al.  “Roots: The Next Generation”—Who Watched and with What Effect? , 1981 .

[15]  David Whiteman,et al.  Out of the Theaters and Into the Streets: A Coalition Model of the Political Impact of Documentary Film and Video , 2004 .

[16]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[17]  David M. Anderson,et al.  The Civic Web: Online Politics and Democratic Values , 2002 .

[18]  D. Kinder,et al.  Communication and politics in the age of information. , 2003 .

[19]  Mike Allen,et al.  Selective Exposure and Dissonance after Decisions , 2002, Psychological reports.

[20]  William A. Watts,et al.  Selective Exposure to a Presidential Campaign Appeal , 1974 .

[21]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[22]  S. Herbst.  Politics at the margin : historical studies of public expression outside the mainstream , 1996 .

[23]  Richard F. Carter,et al.  Effectiveness of a Political Telethon , 1959 .

[24]  J. Freedman,et al.  PREFERENCE FOR DISSONANT INFORMATION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2003 .

[26]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and their Implications for Participatory Behavior , 2002, Commun. Res..

[27]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[28]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[29]  N. Feather,et al.  Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: A study of cognitive dissonance , 1962 .

[30]  David L. Paletz,et al.  Selective Exposure: The Potential Boomerang Effect , 1972 .

[31]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. , 1996 .

[32]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains From Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions , 2005 .