Farm household level optimal resource allocation. An explorative study in the limestone area of East Java.

The role of agriculture changes markedly when an economy is transforming from developing to developed. The dramatic structural transformation in the development process has consequences for the policies to be implemented. Acknowledging differences between countries, generally speaking, four phases can be distinguished: (1) getting agriculture moving, (2) agriculture as a contributor to growth, (3) integrating agriculture into the macro-economy, and (4) agriculture in industrial economies. In many low income countries, the agricultural sector is still in the 'getting agriculture moving' phase. Due to policies that discriminate against agriculture in many low income countries the sector has not been able to play its potential role in economic development and hence hampering overall economic development. This awareness gives extra reason to evaluate the possibilities for agriculture. Agricultural research is one of the instruments that can be used to enhance the role of agriculture in development. Those that will eventually have to accomplish the goals that are set for agriculture are farm household members. To determine the research agenda at farm household level, agricultural research institutes have relied increasingly on farming systems analysis methods. Fanning systems analysis methods, however, have not been free from problems (Chapter 2). These problems are: fanning systems analysis is vulnerable to subjectivity, has been too qualitative, is mainly farmer oriented, has been mainly crop oriented, has suffered from institutional problems, has been confronted with time conflicts, lacks gender differentiation, and has seen no unification of methods. To overcome some of these problems a new methodology for farming systems analysis was designed. Because this new methodology is more quantitative than most farming systems analysis methods it is named quantitative farming systems analysis. The new methodology encompasses the analysis of the bio-physical and socio-economic components of farming systems. The information that is generated through these analyses is used in a farm household level optimal resource allocation procedure. The working method for the farm household level optimal resource allocation procedure includes three stages and seven steps (Chapter 3). Stage 1: model preparation including (1) goal variable definition and constraint determination, (2) system definition and time horizon determination, and (3) generation of data requirements. Stage 2: (4) construction of the FLORA model. Stage 3: model utilization including (5) computing the playing field, (6) conducting sensitivity analyses, and (7) scenario construction. The study area is situated in the limestone area, South of Malang, East Java, Indonesia (Chapter 4). This area was selected because farm households in the study area are confronted with relatively low incomes, low crop productivity, and high levels of soil loss. Both the local government and the Brawijaya University, where the project was located, share efforts to improve the welfare of farm households in the study area. Results computed during Stage 3 of the farm household level optimal resource allocation procedure are presented in Chapter 5. The manner in which the procedure was developed deviated from the original design. The reasons for this are described (Chapter 6). Also the contribution of the FLORA procedure in overcoming the problems facing farming systems analysis methods is evaluated. Due to institutional conditions the procedure to establish goals for research interactively with stakeholders had to be postponed, but this dissertation enables goals for research to be presented to stakeholders and trade-offs between goal variables to be demonstrated. This dissertation concludes that future efforts to implement QFSA to establish goals for agricultural research should focus on: clear research objectives, selective data collection, better interdisciplinarity, phasing of research activities, and simple and quick modelling procedures.

[1]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. , 1987 .

[2]  H. Lanen,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative physical land evaluation : an operational approach , 1991 .

[3]  D. Rocheleau Gender, ecology, and the science of survival: Stories and lessons from Kenya , 1991 .

[4]  Ann Pettit Arachis hypogaea L. , 1895 .

[5]  W. Lewis Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour , 1954 .

[6]  H. Feldstein,et al.  Working together : gender analysis in agriculture , 1990 .

[7]  Jaap Spronk,et al.  A Feasibility Study of Economic and Environmental Scenarios by Means of Interactive Multiple Goal Programming , 1983 .

[8]  K. F. Wiersum,et al.  Gliricidium sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. , 1992 .

[9]  N. Breemen,et al.  Rice : soil, water, land , 1978 .

[10]  Wayne Hoof Mixed cropping of groundnuts and maize in East Java , 1987 .

[11]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Application of interactive multiple goal programming techniques for analysis and planning of regional agricultural development. , 1988 .

[12]  Leo Stroosnijder,et al.  QFSA: A new method for farm level planning. , 1994 .

[13]  P. Barlett,et al.  Agricultural decision making. Anthropological contributions to rural development. , 1982 .

[14]  Theodore W. Schultz,et al.  Transforming Traditional Agriculture , 1964 .

[15]  L. Kalshoven,et al.  Pests of crops in Indonesia. , 1981 .

[16]  W. Shaner Farming Systems Research And Development: Guidelines For Developing Countries , 1982 .

[17]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Interactive multiple goal programming , 1981 .

[18]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Determination of input and output coefficients of cropping systems in the European Community. , 1995 .

[20]  J. W. Purseglove Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons, Vols. 1 & 2 , 1968 .

[21]  J. Wolf,et al.  WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. , 1989 .

[22]  D. Norman,et al.  Farming systems research: a critical appraisal , 1980 .

[23]  H. Barnum,et al.  A model of an agricultural household , 1979 .

[24]  L. Mannetje Pennisetum purpureum Schumach. , 1987 .

[25]  D. M. Tantera,et al.  Grassy stunt disease of rice in Indonesia. , 1973 .

[26]  G. Psacharopoulos,et al.  Investment in Human Capital. , 1972 .

[27]  Stephen A. Marglin Public Investment Criteria , 1967 .

[28]  M. Rosenzweig Neoclassical Theory and the Optimizing Peasant: An Econometric Analysis of Market Family Labor Supply in a Developing Country , 1980 .

[29]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Multiple Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions , 1989 .

[30]  J. Palte Upland farming on Java, Indonesia : a socio-economic study of upland agriculture and subsistence under population pressure , 1992, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[31]  S. L. Efdé Quantified and integrated crop and livestock production analysis at the farm level: exploring options for land use of mixed farms on heavy limestone soils south of Malang, East Java, Indonesia. , 1996 .

[32]  J. Cock Cassava: New Potential For A Neglected Crop , 1984 .

[33]  S. Reutlinger,et al.  Poverty and Hunger: Issues and options for food security in developing countries , 1986 .

[34]  C. A. van Diepen,et al.  Ground for choices: a scenario study on perspectives for rural areas in the European Community. , 1991 .

[35]  A. Huijsman Choice and uncertainty in a semi-subsistence economy: a study of decision making in a Philippine village. , 1986 .

[36]  R. H. V. Corley,et al.  Potential Productivity of Tropical Perennial Crops , 1983, Experimental Agriculture.

[37]  K. Giller,et al.  Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems , 1993 .

[38]  C. Timmer The agricultural transformation , 1986 .

[39]  T. Yamaguchi,et al.  Causal agents of cassava bacterial wilt in Indonesia. , 1980 .

[40]  R. Pandya-Lorch,et al.  Prospects for world food security and distribution , 1995 .

[41]  Arthur T. Mosher,et al.  Getting agriculture moving : essentials for development and modernization / Arthur T. Mosher , 1966 .

[42]  M. Cannell Plant management in agroforestry: manipulation of trees, population densities and mixtures of trees and herbaceous crops , 1983 .

[43]  J. Doorenbos,et al.  Yield response to water , 1979 .

[44]  森田 茂樹 インゲンマメ(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)の蛋白の分別 , 1966 .

[45]  J. White,et al.  Relative Effect of Root and Shoot Genotypes on Yield of Common Bean under Drought Stress , 1989 .

[46]  D. Datta,et al.  Principles and Practices of Rice Production , 1981 .

[47]  R. Mcleod Indonesia assessment 1994 : finance as a key sector in Indonesia's development , 1994 .

[48]  D. Norman Farming Systems Research to Improve the Livelihood of Small Farmers , 1978 .

[49]  H. Barnum,et al.  An econometric application of the theory of the farm-household , 1979 .

[50]  S. O. Ojo,et al.  CONSUMPTIVE WATER USE OF RAINFED MAIZE IN NIGERIA , 1986 .

[51]  C. J. van Eijk,et al.  Mogelijkheden voor volledige werkgelegenheid : een verkenning van de beleidsruimte , 1986 .

[52]  J. Oudejans,et al.  Agro-pesticides: properties and functions in integrated crop protection. , 1991 .

[53]  J. Nibbering Hoeing in the hills : stress and resilience in an upland farming system in Java , 1991 .

[54]  S. Shih Relating Calculated Leaf Area Index, Evapotranspiration, and Irrigation Method of Sugarcane , 1989 .

[55]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Planning technologies appropriate to farmers: Concepts and procedures , 1988 .

[56]  M. P. Collinson,et al.  Farming Systems Research in Eastern Africa: The Experience of CIMMYT and Some National Agricultural Research Services, 1976-81 , 1982 .

[57]  L. Lau,et al.  The Linear Logarithmic Expenditure System: An Application to Consumption-Leisure Choice , 1978 .

[58]  De Geus Fertilizer guide for tropical and subtropical farming. , 1967 .

[59]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[60]  J. Strauss,et al.  A survey of agricultural household models : recent findings and policy implications , 1986 .

[61]  K. F. Wiersum,et al.  Gliricidia production and use. , 1989 .

[63]  David J. Pannell,et al.  MIDAS, a bioeconomic model of a dryland farm system. , 1987 .

[64]  D. Byerlee,et al.  Farming Systems Research: Issues in Research Strategy and Technology Design , 1982 .

[65]  J. Yaron,et al.  Successful Rural Finance Institutions , 1992 .

[66]  John William Purseglove,et al.  Tropical crops: monocotyledons , 1972 .

[67]  Inderjit J. Singh,et al.  A Model of an Agricultural Household in a Multi-Crop Economy: The Case of Korea , 1979 .

[68]  J. Doorenbos,et al.  Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements , 1977 .

[69]  J. V. Pischke,et al.  The political economy of specialized farm credit institutions. , 1981 .

[70]  Mohamad Soerjani,et al.  Weeds of Rice in Indonesia , 1986 .

[71]  H. van Keulen Options for agricultural development: a new quantitative approach , 1993 .

[72]  Johan G. Ohler,et al.  Coconut, Tree of Life , 1985 .

[73]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Land evaluation and farming systems analysis for land use planning. (3rd ed.) , 1988 .

[74]  H. Veltkamp Physiological causes of yield variation in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) , 1985 .

[75]  P. M. Driessen,et al.  Land-use systems analysis , 1992 .

[76]  C. Hill World Development Report 1990: Poverty. World Bank , 1993 .

[77]  Van den Bergh,et al.  Competition between herbage plants , 1965 .

[78]  F. Ellis,et al.  Peasant Economics: Farm Households and Agrarian Development , 1989 .