Subcarrier modulation identification of underwater acoustic OFDM based on block expectation maximization and likelihood

Abstract The low identification rate of the Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) based subcarrier modulation in underwater acoustic multipath channel is an important issue. Therefore, we proposed a novel Expectation Maximization-Block-Quasi Hybrid Likelihood Ratio Test (EM-Block-QHLRT) method which effectively improved the identification rate while using the blind channel impulse response (CIR) estimation and likelihood. Initially, CIR is obtained by using clustering, and then the CIR is updated iteratively by EM-Block method. Further, the subcarrier modulation is identified using QHLRT. The influence of iteration times, the length of symbol and influence of the number of blocks in EM are analyzed by using extensive simulation. The identification rate of subcarrier modulation of binary phase shift keying (BPSK), QPSK, 8PSK and 16QAM are presented using different signal noise ratio (SNR). In addition, the identification rate of subcarrier modulation based on Average Likelihood Rate Test (ALRT) as well as QHLRT with EM are compared. Simulation results showed that the identification rate of the proposed EM-Block-QHLRT method can reach to more than 90% when SNR is higher than 5 dB. Finally, the performance of the proposed EM-Block-QHLRT method is verified using sea trial data.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Blind channel identification and equalization in OFDM-based multiantenna systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Danijela Cabric,et al.  Cooperative Modulation Classification for Multipath Fading Channels via Expectation-Maximization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  On the likelihood-based approach to modulation classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Y. Chen,et al.  Efficient Modulation Classification for Adaptive Wireless OFDM Systems in TDD Mode , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[5]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Maximum-likelihood classification for digital amplitude-phase modulations , 2000, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Shengli Zhou,et al.  Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: From subspace methods to compressed sensing , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[7]  Zhiqiang He,et al.  Joint Channel Estimation and Impulsive Noise Mitigation in Underwater Acoustic OFDM Communication Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Jun Tao,et al.  DFT-Precoded MIMO OFDM Underwater Acoustic Communications , 2018, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Khaled Ben Letaief,et al.  Multiuser OFDM with adaptive subcarrier, bit, and power allocation , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[10]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Compressive Sensing of Signals from a GMM with Sparse Precision Matrices , 2014, NIPS.

[11]  Mingyi Gao,et al.  Modulation format identification based on constellation diagrams in adaptive optical OFDM systems , 2019 .

[12]  Songzuo Liu,et al.  Superposition Coding for Downlink Underwater Acoustic OFDM , 2017, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Asynchronous Linear Modulation Classification With Multiple Sensors via Generalized EM Algorithm , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Lu Ma,et al.  A low-complexity orthogonal matching pursuit based channel estimation method for time-varying underwater acoustic OFDM systems , 2019, Applied Acoustics.

[15]  Jinho Choi,et al.  Subcarrier and Power Allocation for Multiuser MIMO-OFDM Systems with Various Detectors , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).