Determinants of the Productivity Change for the Banking Sector in Egypt

This study aims to undertake an evaluation and examination of the productivity change of the Egyptian banking sector, using a novel data set which covers 14 banks operating in the Egyptian market from 1997 to 2013. We use a non-parametric approach Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based analysis to investigate the productivity change in the Egyptian banking sector. Input-oriented Malmquist indices of productivity change are estimated with DEA to measure total factor productivity (TFP) change. The TFP changes are decomposed into the product of technological change and technical efficiency change (catch up). In the second stage, potential determinants of productivity change are studied using a regression model. We find that the Egyptian banking sector as a whole shows a productivity regress of 0.9 per cent per year, which is mainly due to the technological improvements. The estimated regression model identifies some variables which significantly influence the productivity of banks in Egypt. The banks with higher loans to deposit ratio and higher returns on equity have higher productivity growth reflecting on their strong strategic and managerial skills. The size of bank seems to be associated with an increase in productivity. The maturity of a bank (measured by age) is associated with higher productivity. The net interest margin (NIM) and non-interest expense over total assets (NIETA) variables do not seem to be affecting the productivity of banks. Surprisingly, our results reveal that the financial crisis is negatively and statistically insignificant which means there are no effects on the Egyptian banks.

[1]  L. Ganesh,et al.  Productivity growth and efficiency change in Indian banking: Technology effect vs catch‐up effect , 2010 .

[2]  K. Kourouche,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity in the Australian banking sector , 2008 .

[3]  Mohamed E. Chaffai,et al.  Technological and Environmental Differences in the European Banking Industries , 2001 .

[4]  P. Neal.  X-Efficiency and Productivity Change in Australian Banking , 2004 .

[5]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Technical and scale efficiency of Japanese commerical banks: a non-parametric approach , 1993 .

[6]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Bank ownership reform and bank performance in China. , 2009 .

[7]  F. Førsund,et al.  Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries , 1993 .

[8]  Milind Sathye,et al.  X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation , 2001 .

[9]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity growth in Illinois electric utilities , 1990 .

[10]  David C. Wheelock,et al.  PUBLISHED: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, , 1996 .

[11]  L. Seiford,et al.  An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis , 1999 .

[12]  B. Casu,et al.  Financial conglomeration: efficiency, productivity and strategic drive , 2004 .

[13]  Mahmoud Mohieldin,et al.  On bank privatization: The case of Egypt , 2007 .

[14]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[15]  Athanasios G. Noulas,et al.  Deregulation and operating efficiency: the case of the Greek banks , 2001 .

[16]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  The Impact of Financial Liberalization on the Performance of Thai Banks , 1998 .

[17]  B. Casu,et al.  Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches , 2004 .

[18]  K. Kourouche,et al.  Regulatory Policy and the Efficiency of the Banking Sector in Australia , 2008 .

[19]  Seyed Mehdian,et al.  The Comparative Efficiency Performance of Small and Large US Commercial Banks in the Pre- and Post-Deregulation Eras , 1995 .

[20]  M. Hassan,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF THE BANKING INDUSTRY IN BAHRAIN , 2004 .

[21]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[22]  Rasoul Rezvanian,et al.  An examination of cost structure and production performance of commercial banks in Singapore , 2002 .

[23]  B. Casu,et al.  A comparative study of the cost efficiency of Italian bank conglomerates , 2002 .

[24]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[25]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Technical efficiency of Norwegian banks: The non-parametric approach to efficiency measurement , 1991 .

[26]  Quey-Jen Yeh.  The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis in Conjunction with Financial Ratios for Bank Performance Evaluation , 1996 .

[27]  Ha Vu,et al.  Cost and Profit Efficiencies of Australian Banks and the Impact of the Global Financial Crisis , 2011 .

[28]  Ahmed Badreldin,et al.  The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on Bank Performance in Egypt , 2009 .

[29]  M. Reda.  The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Bank Consolidation in Egypt , 2013 .

[30]  R. Grabowski,et al.  The effect of deregulation on the efficiency of U.S. banking firms , 1994 .

[31]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity growth in Japanese banking: a nonparametrie frontier approach , 1995 .

[32]  Gary D. Ferrier,et al.  Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence , 1990 .

[33]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis:the mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis , 2008 .

[34]  C. Lovell,et al.  Deregulation and productivity decline: the case of Spanish savings banks , 1996 .

[35]  N. Hermes,et al.  The impact of financial liberalization on bank efficiency: evidence from Latin America and Asia , 2007 .

[36]  I. Isik,et al.  Efficiency and Productivity Change of Egyptian Commercial Banks (1995-2003) Reda, Malak and Isik, Ihsan ∗ , 2003 .

[37]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Effects of Deregulation on the Productivity of Korean Banks , 1998 .

[38]  Rasoul Rezvanian,et al.  Efficiency change, technological progress and productivity growth of private, public and foreign banks in India: evidence from the post-liberalization era , 2008 .

[39]  S. Miller,et al.  Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience , 2001 .

[40]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[41]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[42]  Ammar Jreisat,et al.  Banking Efficiency in the Middle East: A Survey and New Results for the Jordanian Banks , 2010 .

[43]  Mohamed E. Chaffai.  Estimating input-specific technical inefficiency: The case of the Tunisian banking industry , 1997 .

[44]  L. Cavallo,et al.  Do environmental variables affect the performance and technical efficiency of the European banking systems? A parametric analysis using the stochastic frontier approach , 2002 .

[45]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  The impact of banking regulations on banks' cost and profit efficiency: Cross-country evidence , 2009 .

[46]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[47]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[48]  Milind Sathye,et al.  Measuring productivity changes in Australian banking: an application of Malmquist indices , 2002 .

[49]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89 , 1992 .

[50]  Carlo A. Favero,et al.  Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the Italian banking sector: A non-parametric approach , 1995 .

[51]  A. Bhatia,et al.  Non-parametric Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) in India , 2016 .