Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students

A multidisciplinary faculty committee designed a curriculum to shape biomedical graduate students into researchers with a high commitment to professionalism and social responsibility and to provide students with tools to navigate complex, rapidly evolving academic and societal environments with a strong ethical commitment. The curriculum used problem-based learning (PBL), because it is active and learner-centred and focuses on skill and process development. Two courses were developed: Scientific Professionalism: Scientific Integrity addressed discipline-specific and broad professional norms and obligations for the ethical practice of science and responsible conduct of research (RCR). Scientific Professionalism: Bioethics and Social Responsibility focused on current ethical and bioethical issues within the scientific profession, and implications of research for society. Each small-group session examined case scenarios that included: (1) learning objectives for professional norms and obligations; (2) key ethical issues and philosophies within each topic area; (3) one or more of the RCR instructional areas; and (4) at least one type of moral reflection. Cases emphasised professional standards, obligations and underlying philosophies for the ethical practice of science, competing interests of stakeholders and oversight of science (internal and external). To our knowledge, this is the first use of a longitudinal, multi-semester PBL course to teach scientific integrity and professionalism. Both faculty and students endorsed the active learning approach for these topics, in contrast to a compliance-based approach that emphasises learning rules and regulations.

[1]  S. Athar Principles of Biomedical Ethics , 2011, The Journal of IMA.

[2]  Trish Bartley,et al.  Facilitating the Learning , 2011 .

[3]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Reported Goals for Responsible Conduct of Research Courses , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al.  The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  Kelly R Risbey,et al.  What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  Nancy L. Jones,et al.  A code of ethics for the life sciences , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  Ann Lambros,et al.  Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to Implementation , 2004 .

[9]  K. Okkenhaug,et al.  Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  M. Kalichman Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct , 2003 .

[11]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. , 1999, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[12]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  Melissa S. Anderson Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's Graduate Education Project , 1996 .

[14]  M. Bebeau Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment. , 1995 .

[15]  M J Bebeau,et al.  The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. , 1994, Journal of dental education.

[16]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  The graduate student experience and subscription to the norms of science , 1994 .

[17]  L. Treviño,et al.  Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences , 1993 .

[18]  S. Brookfield Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of Principles and Effective Practices , 1986 .

[19]  Carol B. Aslanian Adults as Learners: Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning , 1983 .

[20]  D. Vallero,et al.  Beyond responsible conduct in research: new pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies. , 2007, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[21]  R. Vallance Formation in Research Ethics: Developing a teaching approach for the social sciences , 2004 .

[22]  James R. Rest,et al.  A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach: The DIT and Schema Theory , 1999 .

[23]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  12 – The Role of Symbolic Management: How Can Managers Effectively Transmit Organizational Culture? , 1984 .

[24]  J. Pfeffer Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms , 1981 .

[25]  M. Knowles The Modern practice of adult education : andragogy versus pedagogy / , 1970 .