Optimizing User's Utility from Cloud Computing Services in a Networked Environment

Cloud Computing customers are looking for the best utility for their money. Research shows that functional aspects are considered more important than service prices in customer buying decisions. Choosing the best service provider might be complicated since each provider may sell three kinds of services organized in three layers: SaaS (Software as a service), PaaS (Platform as a service) and IaaS (Infrastructure as a service). This research targets the problem of optimizing consumers' utility, using conjoint analysis methodology. Providers currently offer software services as bundles belonging to the same layer, or to underlying layers. Bundling services prevent customers from splitting their service purchases between a provider of software and a different provider of the underlying layers. This research assumes that in the future will exist a free competitive market, in which consumers will be free to switch their services to different providers, eliminating the negative biases of bundling, during making their buying decisions. This research proposes a mathematical model and three possible strategies for implementation in organizations, and illustrates its advantages compared to existing utility maximization practices. Current conjoint analysis method chooses the best utility in a traditional cloud architecture in which one provider offers a bundle of all three layers. The proposed model assumes a networked cloud architecture in which a customer may choose services from any provider, building for himself the best basket of services maximizing his/her total utility. This research outlines three business models which will assist organizations shift gradually from current CC architecture to the future networked architectures, thus maximizing their utility.

[1]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  Making money with clouds: Revenue optimization through automated policy decisions , 2009, ECIS.

[2]  Romain Rouvoy,et al.  A Federated Multi-cloud PaaS Infrastructure , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Cloud Computing.

[3]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1-1-2010 CUSTOMER HETEROGENEITY AND TARIFF BIASES IN CLOUD COMPUTING , 2013 .

[4]  Yuval Cohen,et al.  Cost Optimization of Cloud Computing Services in a Networked Environment , 2015 .

[5]  Tomonori Aoyama,et al.  Inter-Cloud Computing , 2011, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[6]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[7]  Andreja Pucihar,et al.  Business Model Factors Influencing Cloud Computing Adoption: Differences in Opinion , 2013, Bled eConference.

[8]  Will Venters,et al.  A critical review of cloud computing: researching desires and realities , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Chris Rose,et al.  A Break in the Clouds: Towards a Cloud Definition , 2011 .

[10]  Toby Velte,et al.  Cloud Computing, A Practical Approach , 2009 .

[11]  Deborah Bunker,et al.  Moving Forward: Emerging Themes in Financial Services Technologies' Adoption , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Nikolay Borissov,et al.  Cloud Computing – A Classification, Business Models, and Research Directions , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[13]  Arun Anandasivam,et al.  Cloud Services from a Consumer Perspective , 2010, AMCIS.

[14]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing , 2009 .

[15]  Farookh Khadeer Hussain,et al.  Towards Multi-criteria Cloud Service Selection , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001, Interfaces.

[17]  R. Weiber,et al.  Auswahl von Eigenschaften und Ausprägungen bei der Conjointanalyse , 2009 .

[18]  Xin Jiang,et al.  Cloud computing-based forensic analysis for collaborative network security management system , 2013 .

[19]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges , 2010, Journal of Internet Services and Applications.

[20]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[21]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Brokering Algorithms for Optimizing the Availability and Cost of Cloud Storage Services , 2013, 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science.