Assessing and Addressing Ethical Risk from Anthropomorphism and Deception in Socially Assistive Robots

In this paper we apply the recent concept of robot Ethical Risk Assessment to an exemplar Socially Assistive Robot (SAR); specifically considering ethical risks posed by anthropomorphism in this context. We draw on two complimentary studies to demonstrate that anthropomorphism is important to overall SAR function and overall relatively low ethical risk. As such, rather than avoiding anthropomoprhism all together (as suggested in a recently published standard on robot ethics), we suggest anthropomorphism in SARs should be a customisable trait that can be adapted to the user.

[1]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement , 1999 .

[2]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[3]  Hanafiah Yussof,et al.  Emergence of Socially Assistive Robotics in Rehabilitation for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Review , 2016 .

[4]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Learning by Teaching a Robot: The Case of Handwriting , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Ingo Lütkebohle,et al.  A robot as fitness companion: Towards an interactive action-based motivation model , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Paul Bremner,et al.  Effective Persuasion Strategies for Socially Assistive Robots , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Are Emotional Robots Deceptive? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[9]  John S. Seiter,et al.  Persuasion: Social Inflence and Compliance Gaining , 2015 .

[10]  Tom Williams,et al.  Exploring the Role of Gender in Perceptions of Robotic Noncompliance , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[11]  N. Gale,et al.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[12]  R. Sparrow.  The March of the robot dogs , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[13]  D. Feil-Seifer,et al.  Defining socially assistive robotics , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[14]  C. Gastmans,et al.  The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. , 2018, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[15]  Mathias Broth,et al.  "Are You Sad, Cozmo?" How Humans Make Sense of a Home Robot’s Emotion Displays , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Teaching robots social autonomy from in situ human guidance , 2019, Science Robotics.

[17]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Encouraging physical therapy compliance with a hands-Off mobile robot , 2006, HRI '06.