Imputation strategies for blood pressure data nonignorably missing due to medication use

Background Underlying or untreated blood pressure (BP) is often an outcome of interest, but is unobservable when study participants are on anti-hypertensive medications. Untreated levels are not missing at random but would be higher among those on such medication. In such cases, standard methods of analysis may lead to bias. Purpose BPs obtained at the private physician's office (out-of-study BPs) at the time of prescription of anti-hypertensive medications were available from Phase II of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) and were used to adjust for the potential bias. Methods Observed out-of-study BPs were used to estimate the conditional expectation and variance of the unobserved unmedicated study BPs. For those with no physician data, imputation from bootstrap samples of out-of-study BPs was used. An iterative method based on the EM algorithm was used to estimate the unknown study parameters in a random-effects model using multiple imputations. This was compared to an alternative model for the out-of-study BPs based on a theoretical truncated normal distribution, and to standard analyses, including both multivariate repeated measures and last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analyses, using data from Phase II of TOHP. Results Differences between methods were seen in the decline in BP over time in the reference group, where the changes from baseline to 36 months were 3.0 in univariate analyses, 2.4 using LOCF, and 2.6 in the multivariate analysis, compared to 2.0 or 1.7 in the imputation analyses, depending on the number of physician visits. Estimated intervention effects tended to be slightly larger using the imputation methods. Limitations out-of-study measures may not be available for other studies. Conclusions Because the proposed strategy was based on an empirically observed distribution for out-of-study BP, fewer assumptions about the missing data were made. These data may be useful in suggesting imputation strategies for other studies.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse , 1986 .

[2]  Nuala A Sheehan,et al.  Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  D. Rubin Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years , 1996 .

[4]  Orton,et al.  Multiple Imputation in Practice , 2001 .

[5]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[7]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  The effect of correlation structure on treatment contrasts estimated from incomplete clinical trial data with likelihood-based repeated measures compared with last observation carried forward ANOVA , 2004, Clinical trials.

[8]  The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V) , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[10]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Multiple imputation in mixture models for nonignorable nonresponse with follow-ups , 1993 .

[11]  J. Windeler,et al.  Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  C. Coffey,et al.  Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: beyond LOCF , 2003, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[13]  D B Rubin,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Data with Missing and Below‐Threshold Measurements: Time‐Series Concentrations of Pollutants in the Arctic , 2001, Biometrics.

[14]  N. Cook,et al.  An imputation method for non-ignorable missing data in studies of blood pressure. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Jürgen Unützer,et al.  A comparison of imputation methods in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  N. Cook,et al.  Design of a multicenter trial to evaluate long-term life-style intervention in adults with high-normal blood pressure levels. Trials of Hypertension Prevention (phase II). Trials of Hypertension Prevention (TOHP) Collaborative Research Group. , 1995, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  Ian R White,et al.  Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals , 2004, Clinical trials.

[18]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 2002 .

[19]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials , 2005, Clinical trials.

[20]  B. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Tobit Modeling of Longitudinal Ordinal Clinical Trial Compliance Data with Nonignorable Missingness , 1996 .

[21]  Jun Shao,et al.  Last observation carry‐forward and last observation analysis , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[23]  J. G. Findlay,et al.  Correcting for the bias caused by drop-outs in hypertension trials. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[25]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[26]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Ignorability and bias in clinical trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.