Perceived motion direction during smooth pursuit eye movements

Although many studies have been devoted to motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements, relatively little attention has been paid to the question of whether the compensation for the effects of these eye movements is the same across different stimulus directions. The few studies that have addressed this issue provide conflicting conclusions. We measured the perceived motion direction of a stimulus dot during horizontal ocular pursuit for stimulus directions spanning the entire range of 360°. The stimulus moved at either 3 or 8°/s. Constancy of the degree of compensation was assessed by fitting the classical linear model of motion perception during pursuit. According to this model, the perceived velocity is the result of adding an eye movement signal that estimates the eye velocity to the retinal signal that estimates the retinal image velocity for a given stimulus object. The perceived direction depends on the gain ratio of the two signals, which is assumed to be constant across stimulus directions. The model provided a good fit to the data, suggesting that compensation is indeed constant across stimulus direction. Moreover, the gain ratio was lower for the higher stimulus speed, explaining differences in results in the literature.

[1]  Hermann Aubert,et al.  Die Bewegungsempfindung , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[2]  R. Miall,et al.  Changes in motion perception following oculomotor smooth pursuit adaptation , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J Hohnsbein,et al.  Perceptual constancy during ocutar pursuit: A quantitative estimation procedure , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  T. Freeman,et al.  Transducer models of head-centred motion perception , 2001, Vision Research.

[5]  M. A. Frens,et al.  Recording eye movements with video-oculography and scleral search coils: a direct comparison of two methods , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Edward Herman,et al.  The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  E. Batschelet.  Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[8]  H Wallach,et al.  The perception of motion during colinear eye movements , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  B. Graaf,et al.  The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: Adjacency is not a factor contributing to the filehne illusion , 1988, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Motion processing in peripheral vision: Reaction time and perceived velocity , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon? , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Reference Repulsion When Judging the Direction of Visual Motion , 1998, Perception.

[13]  E. Holst.  Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs , 1954 .

[14]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  Ernst von Fleischl,et al.  Physiologisch-optische Notizen , 1882 .

[16]  J. Pola,et al.  Visual perception of direction when voluntary saccades occur: II. Relation of visual direction of a fixation target extinguished before a saccade to a subsequent test flash presented before the saccade , 1970 .

[17]  H. J. Rauder.  Reference repulision when judging the direction of visual motion , 1998 .

[18]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception , 2001, Vision Research.

[19]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Interaction of Retinal Image and Eye Velocity in Motion Perception , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  A. Wertheim,et al.  Retinal and Extraretinal Information in Movement Perception: How to Invert the Filehne Illusion , 1987, Perception.

[21]  L. Matin,et al.  Visual perception of direction when voluntary saccades occur. I. Relation of visual direction of a fixation target extinguished before a saccade to a flash presented during the saccade , 1969 .

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  S. Mateeff.  Saccadic eye movements and localization of visual stimuli , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  T. Freeman,et al.  Path perception and Filehne illusion compared: model and data , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  J A Crowell,et al.  Extraretinal and retinal amplitude and phase errors during Filehne illusion and path perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  H Wallach,et al.  A limitation of position constancy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[28]  Hermann Aubert.  Die Bewegungsempfindung , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[29]  M T Swanston,et al.  The perception of visual motion during movements of the eyes and of the head , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Alexander Grunewald,et al.  Motion repulsion is monocular , 2004, Vision Research.

[31]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Motion perception during selfmotion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Junghyun Park,et al.  Non-veridical visual motion perception immediately after saccades , 2001, Vision Research.

[33]  E Herman,et al.  Position Constancy during Pursuit Eye Movement: An Investigation of the Filehne Illusion , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.