Benefits of clustering among the Internet search agents caught in the n-person prisoner's dilemma game

In searching for information on the Internet, often times one experiences contention of information servers. Usually, information on the Internet is collected by autonomous search agents that send out queries to the servers that may have the information sought. From a single agent's perspective, sending out as many queries as possible maximizes the chance of achieving the information sought. However, if every agent does the same, the information sites will be overloaded and most of the agents will be dissatisfied. In general, cooperation-sending a moderate number of queries-is desired for everyone's good. In essence, the Internet search agents are caught in the n-person prisoner's dilemma game. When the number of available information sites is much larger than that of the information-seeking agents (i.e., the resource is abundant), cooperation may not be necessary since there is little incentive to cooperate. However, when the resource is scarce, cooperation will lead more agents successfully retrieving the information within reasonable time. It is, however, generally not possible to know how many information sites are available in the world and how many other agents may seek the same information sites. We present possible benefits of accessing "local" information sites, forming "communities" leading to a global satisfaction of the agents involved.

[1]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[2]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Learning Interface Agents , 1993, AAAI.

[3]  Jae C. Oh Effects of physical body on biased opponent selection in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1999 .

[4]  Per Molander,et al.  The Prevalence of Free Riding , 1992 .

[5]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Efficient information gathering on the Internet , 1996, Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.

[6]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  The potential for the evolution of co-operation among web agents , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[8]  B. Huberman,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL DILEMMAS , 1994 .

[9]  Xin Yao,et al.  An Experimental Study of N-Person Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Games , 1993, Informatica.

[10]  Jae C. Oh Ostracism for improving cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma game , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[11]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Agent-Oriented Programming , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  A Personal Learning Apprentice , 1992, AAAI.

[13]  Jae C. Oh,et al.  Promoting cooperation using 'kin' biased conditional strategy in the iterated prisoner's dilemma game , 2000, Inf. Sci..

[14]  EnvironmentsJae C. Ohjoh Emergence of Kin Habitats and Cooperation in Multi-Agent , 1998 .

[15]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  An Approach to Planning with Incomplete Information , 1992, KR.

[16]  A. Colman Game theory and experimental games , 1982 .