Effect of zealotry in high-dimensional opinion dynamics models.

Most of the work on opinion dynamics models focuses on the case of two or three opinion types. We consider the case of an arbitrary number of opinions in the mean field case of the naming game model in which it is assumed the population is infinite and all individuals are neighbors. A particular challenge of the naming game model is that the number of variables, which corresponds to the number of possible sets of opinions, grows exponentially with the number of possible opinions. We present a method for generating mean field dynamical equations for the general case of k opinions. We calculate the steady states in two important special cases in arbitrarily high dimension: the case in which there exist zealots of only one type, and the case in which there are an equal number of zealots for each opinion. We show that in these special cases a phase transition occurs at critical values p(c) of the parameter p describing the fraction of zealots. In the former case, the critical value determines the threshold value beyond which it is not possible for the opinion with no zealots to be held by more nodes than the opinion with zealots, and this point remains fixed regardless of dimension. In the latter case, the critical point p(c) is the threshold value beyond which a stalemate between all k opinions is guaranteed, and we show that it decays precisely as a lognormal curve in k.

[1]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Who's talking first? Consensus or lack thereof in coevolving opinion formation models. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[2]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[3]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous opinion dynamics of multidimensional allocation problems under bounded confidence: More dimensions lead to better chances for consensus , 2007, 0708.2923.

[4]  Quintan Wiktorowicz,et al.  Radical Islam Rising: Muslim Extremism in the West , 2005 .

[5]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice , 1997 .

[6]  Animesh Mukherjee,et al.  Opinion formation in time-varying social networks: The case of Naming Game , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  A. Ozdaglar,et al.  Discrete Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2011 .

[8]  S. Redner,et al.  On the role of zealotry in the voter model , 2007 .

[9]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Evolution of Opinions on Social Networks in the Presence of Competing Committed Groups , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  Wooseop Kwak,et al.  Existence of an upper critical dimension in the majority voter model. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  S Redner,et al.  Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Agreement dynamics on interaction networks with diverse topologies. , 2007, Chaos.

[14]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Kevin S. Chan,et al.  The impact of competing zealots on opinion dynamics , 2014 .

[16]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[17]  L. Steels,et al.  In-depth analysis of the Naming Game dynamics: the homogeneous mixing case , 2008, ArXiv.

[18]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[19]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[20]  M. Mobilia,et al.  Voting and catalytic processes with inhomogeneities. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  M. Mobilia.  Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? , 2003, Physical review letters.

[22]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[23]  Krista N. Jenkins,et al.  Book Section: Essay and Review: Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America , 2005 .

[24]  Luc Steels.  A self-organizing spatial vocabulary , 1995 .

[25]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.