SYSTEMATICS OF THE EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL POTENTIAL: A PSYCHOPHYSICAL‐ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL COMPARISON *

Throughout the history of physiological psychology there has been existent a frustrated enthusiasm for direct comparisons between psychophysical responses and electrophysiological measures from the same verbally responsive human subjects. Unfortunately, experimental surgery, unrelated to pathological conditions, as it should have, remained an unacceptable course of action, and little could be made of the diffused and minute electrical signals which certainly existed below the myographic and resting encephalographic noise. It was the work of G. B. Dawson5 which opened up a whole new spectrum of possibilities of experimental inquiries. Professor Dawson devised techniques for recording signals from the major peripheral nerves by percutaneous recording as well as suggesting the techniques of statistical averaging which are used by all of the participants in this conference. Our earlier workg8l took advantage of the ability to measure peripheral nerve action potentials in the intact human arm and studied the temporal and spatial coding correlates of estimates of sensory magnitude. The success of these earlier studies led us to the present investigations which are directed at the coding of sensory intensity and space as they are reflected in the somatosensory evoked cortical potential. Since Dawson's original work, considerable attention has been directed towards the improvement of techniques and the associated instrumentation. The membership of this conference includes some of the contributors to this aspect of this work, and the reader is specifically directed to the work of W. A. Clark, Jr.,Io B. S. Rosner" and Professor Rosenblith's Laboratory9 at MIT. Recent reviews by Davis and Ferris? and Rosenbliths are useful guides to the instrumentation complexities. As stated, the present studies were carried out to determine which measures of the evoked cortical responses could be correlated with behavioral measures, and therefore, were representative codes of psychological phenomena. Because of certain features of the recorded potentials it was also possible to tentatively associate certain portions of the averaged waveform with specific anatomic structures, Section A of our experiments and results section presents a description of the waveform which, along with the results of Section E, the effects of sleep on the evoked potential, contribute to this association. Section B presents the results of

[1]  P. Glees,et al.  Commissural fibers of the macaque thalamus. An experimental study , 1948, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  INHIBITION IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  A. Akelaitis A Study of Gnosis, Praxis and Language Following Section of the Corpus Callosum and Anterior Commissure , 1944 .

[4]  B. Grafstein Organization of callosal connections in suprasylvian gyrus of cat. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  W. Uttal The three-stimulus problem: a further comparison of neural and psychophysical responses in the somesthetic system. , 1960, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  W. Rosenblith Some quantifiable aspects of the electrical activity of the nervous system (with emphasis upon responses to sensory stimuli). , 1959, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[7]  W R UTTAL,et al.  Inhibitory interaction of responses to electrical stimuli in the fingers. , 1960, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  H. Nakahama Cerebral response in somatic area II of ipsilateral somatic I origin. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  H. Nakahama Cerebral response of anterior sigmoid gyrus to ipsilateral posterior sigmoid stimulation in cat. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Allison Recovery functions of somatosensory evoked responses in man. , 1962, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  L. Larsson Electroencephalographic responses to peripheral nerve stimulation in man. , 1953, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  R.N.Dej.,et al.  The Cerebral Cortex of Man , 1951, Neurology.

[13]  G. Dawson A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. , 1954, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Dawson,et al.  Cerebral responses to nerve stimulation in man. , 1950, British medical bulletin.

[15]  R. Mark,et al.  Cortical projection of impulses in myelinated cutaneous afferent nerve fibres of the cat , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J. K. Merlis The Electrical Activity of the Nervous System , 1961 .

[17]  A new instrument for the summation of evoked responses from the nervous system. , 1960, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  W. Uttal A comparison of neural and psychophysical responses in the somesthetic system. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  G. Moruzzi,et al.  Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. , 1949, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Chris Daniel. Geisler,et al.  Average responses to clicks in man recorded by scalp electrodes , 1960 .

[21]  H. Nakahama Contralateral and ipsilateral cortical responses from somatic afferent nerves. , 1958, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. H. Pirenne,et al.  The sensations : their functions, processes and mechanisms , 1952 .

[23]  P. Wall,et al.  Repetitive discharge of neurons. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Zigler Touch and kinesthesis. , 1930 .