Enhancing the doctoral journey: the role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity

This article explores the role of group supervision within doctoral education, offering an exploration of the experience of group supervision processes through a small-scale study evaluating both student and staff experience across three cohorts of one professional doctorate programme. There has been very little research to date exploring mechanisms which might facilitate reflection on such programmes, such as group supervision and cohort-based pedagogies. The article raises important questions concerning what constitutes group supervision, and the opportunities it offers for wider learning opportunities beyond existing models of supervision by developing an enriched learning environment through peer learning. This pedagogical approach enables professional doctorate students to engage reflexively with discursive processes around their identity as researching professionals. Discussion of the findings will explore the impact of peer learning on the doctoral student journey, and whether any benefits of group supervision may have applicability across other kinds of doctoral programmes.

[1]  David Boud,et al.  Productive Reflection at Work: Learning for Changing Organizations , 2006 .

[2]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  Aytaç Göğüş.  Peer learning and assessment , 2012 .

[4]  J. Gee.  Identity as an analytic lens for research in education , 2000 .

[5]  C. Bransford.  Process-Centered Group Supervision , 2009 .

[6]  Karen Czapiewski,et al.  QAA Code of Practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education — and its use in relation to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 , 2002 .

[7]  Akylina Samara.  Group supervision in graduate education: a process of supervision skill development and text improvement , 2006 .

[8]  Mary-Helen Ward,et al.  Blogging PhD candidature: Revealing the pedagogy , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Williams,et al.  Quality and Standards in Higher Education. , 2010 .

[10]  Bill Green,et al.  Organisational knowledge, professional practice and the professional doctorate at work , 2002 .

[11]  Catherine M. Millett,et al.  Three Magic Letters: Getting to Ph.D. , 2006 .

[12]  K. Topping.  Trends in Peer Learning , 2005 .

[13]  Stan Lester,et al.  Conceptualizing the Practitioner Doctorate. , 2004 .

[14]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  A. Parry.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[16]  S. Leshem,et al.  Stories as mirrors: reflective practice in teaching and learning , 2006 .

[17]  Tony Becher,et al.  Graduate education in Britain , 1993 .

[18]  M. Fall,et al.  A Gestalt Approach to Group Supervision , 2008 .

[19]  C. Manathunga.  Supervision as mentoring: the role of power and boundary crossing , 2007 .

[20]  Catherine Manathunga,et al.  Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy , 2006 .

[21]  Jae-Won Moon.  Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[22]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Three Magic Letters: Getting to Ph.D. , 2008 .

[23]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[24]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other , 2014 .

[25]  O. Zuber-Skerritt.  New Directions in Action Research , 1996 .

[26]  A. Cunliffe.  Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities , 2003 .

[27]  Darren Newbury,et al.  Doctoral education in design, the process of research degree study, and the trained researcher , 2003 .

[28]  G. Gurr,et al.  Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development , 2001 .

[29]  Linley Lord,et al.  Peer to peer support: the disappearing work in the doctoral student experience , 2009 .

[30]  I. Lunt,et al.  Enhancing learning at doctoral level through the use of reflection? , 2008 .

[31]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Higher Education: A Critical Business , 1997 .

[32]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model , 1999 .

[33]  Gina Wisker,et al.  From Supervisory Dialogues to Successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level , 2003 .

[34]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[35]  D. Scott,et al.  Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge , 2004 .

[36]  M. Eraut.  Early career learning at work and its implications for universities , 2005 .

[37]  V. L. Fish,et al.  Mentoring doctoral students through scholastic engagement: adult learning principles in action , 2010 .

[38]  Allyson Holbrook,et al.  Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates , 2005 .

[39]  Tom Bourner,et al.  Professional Doctorates in England , 2001 .

[40]  Margot Pearson,et al.  Research Training and Supervision Development , 2002 .

[41]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[42]  Damian Maher,et al.  ‘Becoming and being writers’: the experiences of doctoral students in writing groups , 2008 .

[43]  R. Usher,et al.  Re-theorising Experience: Adult Learning in Contemporary Social Practices. , 1997 .

[44]  Lesley Atkinson-Baldwyn.  An Other Identity , 2009 .

[45]  D. Heel,et al.  Fostering team learning development , 2006 .

[46]  D. Boud,et al.  ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education 1 , 2005 .

[47]  Terence John Gatfield,et al.  An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications , 2005 .

[48]  J. Forbes.  Reflexivity in professional doctoral research , 2008 .

[49]  B. Fridlund,et al.  Psychiatric nurses' conceptions of how a group supervision programme in nursing care influences their professional competence: a 4-year follow-up study. , 2001, Journal of nursing management.