Marine Ecology Progress Series Mar Ecol Prog Ser

Global changes are shaping the ecology and biogeography of marine species and their fisheries. Macroecology theory, which deals with large scale relationships between ecology and bio- geography, can be used to develop models to predict the effects of global changes on marine species that in turn affect their fisheries. First, based on theories linking trophic energetics and allometric scaling of metabolism, we developed a theoretical model that relates maximum catch potential from a species to its trophic level, geographic range, and mean primary production within the species' exploited range. Then, using this theoretical model and data from 1000 species of exploited marine fishes and invertebrates, we analyzed the empirical relationship between species' approximated maximum catch potential, their ecology, and biogeography variables. Additional variables are inclu- ded in the empirical model to correct for biases resulting from the uncertainty inherent in the origi- nal catch data. The empirical model has high explanatory power and agrees with theoretical expec- tations. In the future, this empirical model can be combined with a bioclimate envelope model to predict the socio-economic impacts of climate change on global marine fisheries. Such potential application is illustrated here with an example pertaining to the small yellow croaker Larimichthys polyactis (Sciaenidae) from the East China Sea.

[1]  J. Emlen,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES , 2008 .

[2]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[3]  Phillip Cassey,et al.  Allometric exponents do not support a universal metabolic allometry. , 2007, Ecology.

[4]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[5]  S. Jennings,et al.  Measurement of body size and abundance in tests of macroecological and food web theory. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  S. Jennings,et al.  Predicting abundance–body size relationships in functional and taxonomic subsets of food webs , 2006, Oecologia.

[7]  D. Pauly,et al.  Distribution ranges of commercial fishes and invertebrates , 2006 .

[8]  S. Jennings,et al.  Predicting abundance–body size relationships in functional and taxonomic subsets of food webs , 2006, Oecologia.

[9]  J. van der Meer Metabolic theories in ecology. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  D. S. Glazier,et al.  Beyond the ‘3/4‐power law’: variation in the intra‐and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[11]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Body size in ecological networks. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Climate Change and Distribution Shifts in Marine Fishes , 2005, Science.

[13]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Response of ocean ecosystems to climate warming , 2004 .

[14]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[15]  Julie M. Roessig,et al.  Effects of global climate change on marine and estuarine fishes and fisheries , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[16]  D. Pauly,et al.  Mapping global fisheries: sharpening our focus , 2004 .

[17]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations , 2004 .

[18]  Tom Fenchel,et al.  Intrinsic rate of natural increase: The relationship with body size , 1974, Oecologia.

[19]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[20]  S. Jennings,et al.  Abundance-body mass relationships in size-structured food webs , 2003 .

[21]  R. Grosberg,et al.  Climate Change, Human Impacts, and the Resilience of Coral Reefs , 2003, Science.

[22]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[23]  M. Dowell,et al.  Parameterization of a spectral solar irradiance model for the global ocean using multiple satellite sensors , 2002 .

[24]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Use of size-based production and stable isotope analyses to predict trophic transfer efficiencies and predator-prey body mass ratios in food webs , 2002 .

[25]  Andrea Belgrano,et al.  Allometric scaling of maximum population density: a common rule for marine phytoplankton and terrestrial plants , 2002 .

[26]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Towards sustainability in world fisheries , 2002, Nature.

[27]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends , 2001, Nature.

[29]  James H. Brown,et al.  Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate , 2001, Science.

[30]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[31]  D. Pauly,et al.  Fishing down Canadian aquatic food webs , 2001 .

[32]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[33]  William E Kunin,et al.  Scaling Down: On the Challenge of Estimating Abundance from Occurrence Patterns , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries , 2000 .

[35]  A. Clarke,et al.  Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish , 1999 .

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[37]  W. Kunin,et al.  Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.

[38]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[39]  K. Gaston,et al.  A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals , 1997 .

[40]  J. Lawton,et al.  Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms , 1997 .

[41]  D. Pauly,et al.  Primary production required to sustain global fisheries , 1995, Nature.

[42]  S. C. Venema,et al.  Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1 : manual , 1993 .

[43]  S. C. Venema,et al.  Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment , 1992 .

[44]  M. B. Schaefer,et al.  Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial Marine fisheries , 1991 .

[45]  K. Shine,et al.  Intergovernmental panel on Climate change (IPCC),in encyclopedia of Enviroment and society,Vol.3 , 2007 .

[46]  T. Platt,et al.  Oceanic Primary Production: Estimation by Remote Sensing at Local and Regional Scales , 1988, Science.

[47]  J. Friedman,et al.  Estimating Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression and Correlation. , 1985 .

[48]  James H. Brown On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[49]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Residuals and Influence in Regression , 1982 .

[50]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[51]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[52]  D. Pauly The relationships between gill surface area and growth performance in fish: a generalization of von Bertalanffy's theory of growth , 1981 .

[53]  M. Kleiber Body size and metabolism , 1932 .