Emotions , Demographics and Sociability in Twitter

The social connections people form online affect the quality of information they receive and their online experience. Although a host of socioeconomic and cognitive factors were implicated in the formation of offline social ties, few of them have been empirically validated, particularly in an online setting. In this study, we analyze a large corpus of georeferenced messages, or tweets, posted by social media users from a major US metropolitan area. We linked these tweets to US Census data through their locations. This allowed us to measure emotions expressed in the tweets posted from an area, the structure of social connections, and also use that area’s socioeconomic characteristics in analysis. We find that at an aggregate level, places where social media users engage more deeply with less diverse social contacts are those where they express more negative emotions, like sadness and anger. Demographics also has an impact: these places have residents with lower household income and education levels. Conversely, places where people engage less frequently but with diverse contacts have happier, more positive messages posted from them and also have better educated, younger, more affluent residents. Results suggest that cognitive factors and offline characteristics affect the quality of online interactions. Our work highlights the value of linking social media data to traditional data sources, such as US Census, to drive novel analysis of online behavior.

[1]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Social functionality of human emotion. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[3]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Digital Footprints: Opportunities and Challenges for Online Social Research , 2014 .

[4]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls , 2014, ICWSM.

[5]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  User Effort and Network Structure Mediate Access to Information in Networks , 2015, ICWSM.

[6]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Damping Sentiment Analysis in Online Communication: Discussions, Monologs and Dialogs , 2013, CICLing.

[7]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Modeling Users' Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar's Number , 2011, PloS one.

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment strength detection for the social web , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[10]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare , 2011, ICWSM.

[11]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets , 2012, CSCW.

[12]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods , 2013, COSN '13.

[13]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[14]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers , 2012, WSDM '12.

[15]  J. Knote Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[16]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and 'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[17]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: an integrated approach , 2012, PLEAD '12.

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[19]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services , 2011, ICWSM.

[20]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[22]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[23]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Emotional persistence in online chatting communities , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Cultures in Community Question Answering , 2015, HT.

[25]  B. Rimé Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review , 2009 .

[26]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Ahmed Abbasi,et al.  Benchmarking Twitter Sentiment Analysis Tools , 2014, LREC.

[28]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power , 2013, ICWSM.

[29]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Positive words carry less information than negative words , 2011, EPJ Data Science.

[30]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  The Geography of Happiness: Connecting Twitter Sentiment and Expression, Demographics, and Objective Characteristics of Place , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[32]  K. Scherer,et al.  The World of Emotions is not Two-Dimensional , 2007, Psychological science.

[33]  Sam Duffy A community creating their own rules on foursquare , 2011, 2011 Workshop on Mobile and Online Social Networks.

[34]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The Social World of Twitter: Topics, Geography, and Emotions , 2012, ICWSM.

[35]  Matthew E. Brashears Humans use Compression Heuristics to Improve the Recall of Social Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Evolution of the Social Brain , 2003, Science.

[37]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[38]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  B. Fredrickson The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[40]  Lillian Lee,et al.  Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[41]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  VoLUME Xxxix,et al.  THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY , 2010 .

[44]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[45]  Andreas Kaltenbrunner,et al.  Emotions, Public Opinion and U.S. Presidential Approval Rates: A 5 Year Analysis of Online Political Discussions , 2011 .

[46]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: A Behavioral Modeling Approach , 2015, WSDM.

[47]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[48]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Sentiment cascades in the 15M movement , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[49]  Catherine T. Shea,et al.  The affective antecedents of cognitive social network activation , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[50]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Emotions in Product Reviews--Empirics and Models , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[51]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity , 2010, WWW '10.

[52]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .

[53]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences , 1966 .

[54]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.