Protest or mainstream? How the European anti-immigrant parties developed into two separate groups by 19991

.  In their 1994 study of electoral preferences for anti-immigrant parties, Van der Brug et al. (2000) concluded that most voters consider anti-immigrant parties to be normal parties. In this replication using 1999 data, the main conclusions of the 1994 study are confirmed for FPO, Alleanza Nazionale, Dansk Folkeparti and Vlaams Blok. Preferences for these parties are largely determined by the same variables that determine preferences for other parties. Votes for these parties should not be interpreted as protest votes. Things turned out to be different for the Lega Nord, the Centrumdemocraten, the Fremskridtspartiet, the French Front national, the Republikaner and the Wallonian Front National. The motivations to vote for any of the latter parties turn out to be substantially different in 1999 than they were in 1994. In 1999, these parties attracted more protest votes, or rather they lost their ideological and pragmatic votes. This article ends with a discussion of the implications of these findings for our theoretical understanding of electoral support for these parties, as well as for the ongoing political debate about the appropriate strategy to fight them.

[1]  C. Eijk Design issues in electoral research: taking care of (core) business , 2002 .

[2]  Marcel Lubbers,et al.  Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe , 2002 .

[3]  Jocelyn Evans comparative mapping of extreme right electoral dynamics: an overview of ereps (‘extreme right electorates and party success’) , 2001 .

[4]  Mark Swyngedouw The subjective cognitive and affective map of extreme right voters: using open-ended questions in exit polls , 2001 .

[5]  M. Fennema,et al.  Dealing with Extremists in Public Discussion: Front National and 'Republican Front' in France , 2000 .

[6]  P. Scheepers,et al.  Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme Right–Wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories , 2000 .

[7]  The End of Consensus in Austria and Switzerland , 2000 .

[8]  P. Lucardie Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors , 2000 .

[9]  P. Scheepers,et al.  Multilevel modelling of Vlaams Blok voting: Individual and contextual characteristics of the Vlaams Blok vote , 2000 .

[10]  Wouter van der Brug,et al.  Voters' Perceptions and Party Dynamics , 1999 .

[11]  P. Nieuwbeerta,et al.  Class voting in western industrialized countries, 1945—1990: Systematizing and testing explanations , 1999 .

[12]  R. Eatwell The dynamics of right‐wing electoral breakthrough 1 , 1998 .

[13]  Anders Westholm Distance versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Meindert Fennema,et al.  Some Conceptual Issues and Problems in the Comparison of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe , 1997 .

[15]  R. Griffin The ‘post‐Fascism’ of the Alleanza Nazionale: A case study in ideological morphology , 1996 .

[16]  C. Eijk,et al.  What Voters Teach Us About Europe-Wide Elections: What Europe-Wide Elections Teach Us About Voters , 1996 .

[17]  H. Witte,et al.  Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a 'new' extreme right-wing party: The case of 'Vlaams Blok' , 1995 .

[18]  Jaap van Donselaar Post-war fascism in the Netherlands , 1993 .

[19]  Pascal Perrineau,et al.  Why do they vote for Le Pen , 1992 .

[20]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[21]  I. Budge,et al.  Ideology, strategy and party change : spatial analyses of post-war election programmes in 19 democracies , 1987 .

[22]  James A. Stimson Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay , 1985 .