An On-line Truthful and Individually Rational Pricing Mechanism for Ride-sharing

Ride-sharing has the potential of addressing many socioeconomic challenges related to transportation. The rising popularity of ride-sharing platforms (e.g., Uber, Lyft, DiDi) in addition to the emergence of new applications like food delivery and grocery shopping which use a similar platform, calls for an in-depth and detailed evaluation of various aspects of this problem. Auction frameworks and mechanism design, have been widely used for modeling ride-sharing platforms. A key challenge in these approaches is preventing the involving parties from manipulating the platform for their personal gain which in turn, can result in a less satisfactory experience for other parties and/or loss of profit for the platform provider. We introduce a latent space transition model for ride-sharing platforms which drivers can exploit and predict the future supply of the drivers (i.e., available drivers) to their own advantage. Following, we propose a pricing model for ride-sharing platforms which is both truthful and individually rational based on Vickery auctions and show how we can manage the loss of revenue in this approach. We compare our predicting model and pricing model with competing approaches through experiments on New York City's taxi dataset. Our results show that our model can accurately learn the transition patterns of people's ride requests. Furthermore, our pricing mechanism forces drivers to be truthful and takes away any unfair advantage the drivers can achieve by bidding untruthfully. More importantly, our pricing model forces truthfulness without sacrificing much profit unlike what is typical with second-price auction schemes.

[1]  Ling Chen,et al.  SPORE: A sequential personalized spatial item recommender system , 2016, 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[2]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  A Mechanism for Dynamic Ride Sharing Based on Parallel Auctions , 2011, IJCAI.

[3]  Hoong Chuin Lau,et al.  Mechanisms for arranging ride sharing and fare splitting for last-mile travel demands , 2014, AAMAS.

[4]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Where are the passengers?: a grid-based gaussian mixture model for taxi bookings , 2015, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[5]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks , 2011, KDD.

[6]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Huaiyu Zhu On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[8]  Cristina V. Lopes,et al.  An Online Mechanism for Ridesharing in Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems , 2016, IJCAI.

[9]  Athina Markopoulou,et al.  Designing an on-line ride-sharing system , 2015, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[10]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Incentive Design for Ridesharing with Uncertainty , 2015, ArXiv.

[11]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Modeling human location data with mixtures of kernel densities , 2014, KDD.

[12]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Collaboration and shared plans in the open world: studies of ridesharing , 2009, IJCAI 2009.

[13]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  AdWords and generalized on-line matching , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[14]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation , 2013, SIGIR.

[15]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  LCARS: a location-content-aware recommender system , 2013, KDD.

[16]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Mining User Mobility Features for Next Place Prediction in Location-Based Services , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining.

[17]  Yu Zheng,et al.  Real-Time City-Scale Taxi Ridesharing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[18]  Ugur Demiryurek,et al.  Price-aware real-time ride-sharing at scale: an auction-based approach , 2016, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[19]  Ruoming Jin,et al.  Large Scale Real-time Ridesharing with Service Guarantee on Road Networks , 2014, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[20]  Michail G. Lagoudakis,et al.  Simple auctions with performance guarantees for multi-robot task allocation , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[21]  Chi-Yin Chow,et al.  LORE: exploiting sequential influence for location recommendations , 2014, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[22]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A metric for distributions with applications to image databases , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).