Robotized access to the medullary cavity for intramedullary nailing of the femur.

INTRODUCTION The insertion site for an antegrade femoral intramedullary nail in the treatment of a femoral shaft fracture has traditionally been performed using a free-hand technique. An inappropriate starting point can result in suboptimal nail insertion leading to malreduction, or iatrogenic fracture. Furthermore, repeated attempts to establish the optimal starting point can cause additional soft tissue trauma and radiation exposure. In the following study we compared a robot-guided technique with the standard free-hand technique for establishing the entry point of an antegrade femoral nail. We hypothesized that the robot-guided technique is more reliable and efficient. METHODS A custom-made drill-guide was mounted onto the arm of an industrial robot. Two orthogonal fluoroscopic images were acquired from the proximal femur of five cadaveric human specimens. Images were processed with a special software in order to create an enhanced contour-recognition map from which the bone axes were automatically calculated. The drilling trajectory was computed along the extension of the bone-axis. The robot then moved the drill-guide on this trajectory toward the entry point. The drilling was then performed by the surgeon. In the control group, five cadaveric human femora were utilized to manually establish the starting point using the free-hand technique. RESULTS 100% of the intramedullary cavities were successfully accessed with both the robot-guided and the manual techniques. In the manual technique repositioning of the drill was necessary in three out of five cases. The mean number of acquired fluoroscopic images was significantly reduced from 11.6 (manual) to 4 (robot-guided). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted drilling of the entry-point in antegrade femoral nailing is more reliable and requires fewer radiographic images than the free hand technique. Yet, based on economical and logistical considerations, its application will probably only be accepted when a concomitant application for fracture reduction is available.

[1]  Ralf Westphal,et al.  3D visualized robot assisted reduction of femoral shaft fractures: evaluation in exposed cadaveric bones. , 2009, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[2]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Robot-assisted Long Bone Fracture Reduction , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  A hands-on-robot for accurate placement of pedicle screws , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[4]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Robot-assisted fracture reduction: A preliminary study in the femur shaft , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Robot Assisted Fracture Reduction , 2006, ISER.

[6]  R. Bleys,et al.  Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. , 2005, Injury.

[7]  C. Sommer,et al.  Aktueller Stellenwert der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie bei der Frakturversorgung , 2005 .

[8]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  R. Ganz,et al.  Entry Point Soft Tissue Damage in Antegrade Femoral Nailing: A Cadaver Study , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  L Kinzl,et al.  [Local complications of intramedullary nailing]. , 1996, Der Orthopade.

[11]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Force sensing and control for a surgical robot , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  O. Böstman,et al.  Incidence of local complications after intramedullary nailing and after plate fixation of femoral shaft fractures. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  S. Hayati,et al.  A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.