Revealed Preference for Relative Status: Evidence from the Housing Market

This paper investigates the value individuals place on their relative housing consumption as compared to absolute housing consumption. Using observed housing sales from three Ohio MSAs in 2000, a spatial Durbin hedonic price model provides total marginal willingness-to-pay estimates for both characteristics of housing units and those of its neighbors. Using this revealed-preference approach, we find evidence suggesting individuals do value relative house size, but the absolute effect dominates. For instance, the estimates indicate that if all homes in Columbus were to increase in size by 100 square feet, the net effect of impacts on absolute and relative consumption would be to increase house prices by $605 on average. This stands in contrast to the stated preference literature, which frequently find individuals to be willing to forgo absolute well-being in exchange for relative status gains.

[1]  C. Sirmans,et al.  Big House, Little House: Relative Size and Value , 2006 .

[2]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  How Much Do We Care About Absolute Versus Relative Income and Consumption , 2005 .

[3]  Armin Falk,et al.  Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous Goals and Reference Standards , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  J. Galí,et al.  Keeping Up with the Joneses: Consumption Externalities, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Prices , 1994 .

[5]  A. Oswald,et al.  Satisfaction and comparison income , 1996 .

[6]  Mark Thayer,et al.  The Benefits of Visibility Improvement: New Evidence from the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area , 2002 .

[7]  R. Frank.  Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status , 1986 .

[8]  Bernard Farber.  Response Falsification and Spurious Correlation in Survey Research , 1963 .

[9]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data , 2001 .

[10]  J. LeSage.  Bayesian Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Models , 1997 .

[11]  Happiness, Unhappiness, and Suicide: An Empirical Assessment , 2009 .

[12]  Y. Ng,et al.  Relative income, aspiration, environmental quality, individual and political myopia: Why may the rat-race for material growth be welfare-reducing? , 1993 .

[13]  C. M. Jaeger,et al.  An Analysis of Consistency of Response in Household Surveys , 1961 .

[14]  David M. Brasington.  Which Measures of School Quality Does the Housing Market Value , 2000 .

[15]  A. L. Edwards.  The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .

[16]  J. Duesenberry,et al.  Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior , 1950 .

[17]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Andrew B. Abel,et al.  Asset Prices Under Habit Formation and Catching Up with the Joneses , 1990 .

[19]  A. Raftery,et al.  How Many Iterations in the Gibbs Sampler , 1991 .

[20]  Shirley A. Star,et al.  Age and Sex in the Interview , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[22]  L. Anselin,et al.  Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach , 1998 .

[23]  David M. Brasington,et al.  Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys , 1993 .

[25]  J. Kohlhase,et al.  The Impact of Toxic Waste Sites on Housing Values , 1991 .

[26]  Katherine A. Kiel,et al.  House Prices during Siting Decision Stages: The Case of an Incinerator from Rumor through Operation , 1995 .

[27]  V. Smith,et al.  MEASURING THE IMPACT OF AIR POLLUTION ON PROPERTY VALUES , 1975 .

[28]  W. J. Cobb,et al.  Interviewing in Social Research. , 1955 .

[29]  Erzo F. P. Luttmer.  Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being , 2004 .

[30]  S. Rosen.  Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Do You Enjoy Having More than Others? Survey Evidence of Positional Goods , 2007 .

[32]  F. Hitzhusen,et al.  Property-Value Impacts of an Environmental Disamenity: The Case of Landfills , 2001 .

[33]  William Barnes,et al.  Fred Hirsch, Social Limits to Growth , Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and Henley, 1977, a Twentieth Century Fund Study, xii + 208 £5.50. , 1977, Journal of Social Policy.

[34]  A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell.  Income and Well-being , 2002 .

[35]  G. Donald Jud,et al.  Sample Selection Bias in Estimating Housing Sales Prices , 1994 .

[36]  T. Veblen.  The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1901 .

[37]  Sudip Chattopadhyay.  Estimating the Demand for Air Quality: New Evidence Based on the Chicago Housing Market , 1999 .

[38]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[39]  David Hemenway,et al.  Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns , 1998 .

[40]  Charles N. Weaver,et al.  Validity Of Reported Date of Birth, Salary, and Seniority , 1974 .

[41]  Fredrik Carlsson,et al.  Measuring Future Grandparents' Preferences for Equality and Relative Standing , 2002 .

[42]  Robert H. Frank,et al.  Positional Externalities Cause Large and Preventable Welfare Losses , 2005 .

[43]  J. LeSage.  Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[44]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Price Effects of Landfills on House Values , 1992 .

[45]  G. Blomquist,et al.  A HEDONIC MODEL OF INTERREGIONAL WAGES, RENTS, AND AMENITY VALUES* , 1986 .