Observation operators for the direct assimilation of TRMM microwave imager retrieved soil moisture

[1] Each soil moisture data set is characterized by its specific mean value, variability, and dynamical range. For the assimilation of soil moisture observations into numerical models observation operators have to be developed, which reduce systematic differences. In this study, cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching is used to derive observation operators for TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) derived soil moisture for the southern US, modeled soil moisture fields from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), and model output from the Variable Infiltration Capacity model (VIC). It is found that the transferability of these observation operators in space and time strongly depends on the geographical region. In the Central US, where the assimilation of soil moisture is most promising, the observation operator exhibits little variability in time. The temporal variability in the observation operator can result in substantial differences between the modeled field and the observation. In Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) applications, where the model tends to be updated on a regular basis, dynamic observation operators will be necessary to assimilate soil moisture. For climate studies or re-analysis projects long time series are required to define an observation operator, which correctly reproduces interannual variability.

[1]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[2]  T. Jackson,et al.  Using TRMM/TMI to Retrieve Surface Soil Moisture over the Southern United States from 1998 to 2002 , 2006 .

[3]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[5]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[6]  Jean-François Mahfouf,et al.  Evaluation of the Optimum Interpolation and Nudging Techniques for Soil Moisture Analysis Using FIFE Data , 2000 .

[7]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.

[8]  Arlindo da Silva,et al.  Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias , 1998 .

[9]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Bias reduction in short records of satellite soil moisture , 2004 .

[10]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Global assimilation of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals into the NASA Catchment land surface model , 2005 .

[11]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Large-scale soil moisture mapping in western Africa using the ERS scatterometer , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..