University of Groningen Normal operating range of the microbial community under potato Inceolu , Özgul

It is important to understand the underlying factors that lead to shifts in soil microbial communities, not simply for the characterization of these complex biotic systems, but also to understand the impact that changes in microbial community composition may have on terrestrial ecosystems. In this study, the impact of genetically different potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants growing in arable soil on the soil bacterial community composition was investigated. It was hypothesized that the modifications in the tuber starch content of these plants might lead to changes in root exudation, resulting in changes in bacterial composition near the roots. In a crop rotation schedule, including potato-barley-potato, plants of different potato cultivars were grown, including one genetically modified (GM) line that was modified in its tuber starch content. Thus, to establish the normal operating range (NOR) of soil bacterial community make-up in the production system, the variability of the bacterial communities in soil under the subsequent cropping regimes was determined. The results showed that the effect of the GM potato line on soil bacteria fitted within the NOR. The bacterial community structure of the potato rhizosphere samples was mainly affected by plant growth stage. Besides, clone library and PCR-DGGE analyses indicated that the bulk soil community fluctuated over the three growth seasons, concomitant with the crop rotation and fertilization regime. Some bacterial species found in the bulk soil were specific for the plant species under investigation (barley and potato) or plant growth stage. Arthrobacter, Streptomyces, Rhodanobacter and Dokdonella were only found at flowering potato plants in both seasons, whereas Rhodoplanes and Sporosarcina were only observed in the bulk soil with barley.

[1]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Plant genotype strongly modifies the structure and growth of maize rhizosphere microbial communities , 2010 .

[2]  J. V. van Elsas,et al.  Effects of Plant Genotype and Growth Stage on the Betaproteobacterial Communities Associated with Different Potato Cultivars in Two Fields , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  R. Knight,et al.  Fast UniFrac: Facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[4]  Jim A. Harris,et al.  Soil Microbial Communities and Restoration Ecology: Facilitators or Followers? , 2009, Science.

[5]  M. Schloter,et al.  Rhizosphere Communities of Genetically Modified Zeaxanthin-Accumulating Potato Plants and Their Parent Cultivar Differ Less than Those of Different Potato Cultivars , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[7]  L. Overbeek,et al.  Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) , 2008 .

[8]  W. L. Araújo,et al.  Transgenic tobacco revealing altered bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere during early plant development , 2008, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[9]  M. Nei,et al.  MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  A. Schmalenberger,et al.  Desulfurization of aromatic sulfonates by rhizosphere bacteria: high diversity of the asfA gene. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[11]  James R. Cole,et al.  The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Martin Hartmann,et al.  Community Structure Analyses Are More Sensitive to Differences in Soil Bacterial Communities than Anonymous Diversity Indices , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  C. Poll,et al.  Rhizosphere bacteria affected by transgenic potatoes with antibacterial activities compared with the effects of soil, wild-type potatoes, vegetation stage and pathogen exposure. , 2006, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[14]  J. Handelsman,et al.  Introducing DOTUR, a Computer Program for Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  Thomas Huber,et al.  Bellerophon: a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments , 2004, Bioinform..

[16]  P. Garbeva,et al.  Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. , 2004, Annual review of phytopathology.

[17]  A. Ibekwe,et al.  Changes in developing plant microbial community structure as affected by contaminated water. , 2004, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[18]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil , 2003, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[19]  R. Visser,et al.  A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  H. Heuer,et al.  Effects of T4 Lysozyme Release from Transgenic Potato Roots on Bacterial Rhizosphere Communities Are Negligible Relative to Natural Factors , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  Stephen L. Rathbun,et al.  Quantitative Comparisons of 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Libraries from Environmental Samples , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  J. V. van Elsas,et al.  Analysis of the dynamics of fungal communities in soil via fungal-specific PCR of soil DNA followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[23]  P. Oger,et al.  Effect of crop rotation and soil cover on alteration of the soil microflora generated by the culture of transgenic plants producing opines , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[24]  H. Rodríguez,et al.  Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. , 1999, Biotechnology advances.

[25]  N. Lupwayi,et al.  Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation , 1998 .

[26]  A. Felske,et al.  Phylogeny of the Main Bacterial 16S rRNA Sequences in Drentse A Grassland Soils (The Netherlands) , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[27]  James D. Bever,et al.  INCORPORATING THE SOIL COMMUNITY INTO PLANT POPULATION DYNAMICS : THE UTILITY OF THE FEEDBACK APPROACH , 1997 .

[28]  H. Heuer,et al.  Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[29]  G. Robertson,et al.  Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles as measures of soil microbial community structure , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[30]  J. Lynch,et al.  Substrate flow in the rhizosphere , 1990, Plant and Soil.

[31]  P. Hirsch,et al.  Life in earth: the impact of GM plants on soil ecology? , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[32]  J. D. Elsas,et al.  Extraction and analysis of microbial community nucleic acids from environmental matrices , 2000 .

[33]  H. Gali,et al.  Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien der Kartoffel ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Codierung und Beschreibung nach der erweiterten BBCH-Skala mit Abbildungen , 1993 .