Quantitative analysis of patch patterns in mosaic tissues with ClonalTools software

Quantitative analysis of mosaic tissues is a powerful method for following developmental lineages; however, analytical techniques are often subjective and repetitious. Here a flexible, semi‐automated image analysis method for mosaic patterns is described. ClonalTools is a free customizable tool‐set designed for the open‐source image analysis package ImageJ. Circular, polygonal or linear one‐dimensional mosaic arrays can be interrogated to provide measurements of the total number and width of positive and negative patches in a region of interest. These results are adjusted for the effects of random clumping using a previously described method to correct for differences in the contribution of the positive and negative cell type. The applicability of ClonalTools to different systems is discussed with reference to the analysis of mosaic patterns in the mouse corneal epithelium and adrenal cortex and in the outgrowth of neurites from explant cultures of mouse retina as example systems. To validate ClonalTools quantitatively, a recently published manual clonal analysis of the corneal epithelium of X‐inactivation β‐Gal‐mosaic mice was re‐analysed. The semi‐automated results did not differ significantly from the published data. Rapid quantification of such patterns to produce biologically relevant results represents a welcome improvement in terms of ease and speed of use over previous methods.

[1]  J. Mullins,et al.  Variegated expression of a mouse steroid 21-hydroxylase/beta- galactosidase transgene suggests centripetal migration of adrenocortical cells. , 1996, Molecular endocrinology.

[2]  D. Price,et al.  Heparan Sulphation Patterns Generated by Specific Heparan Sulfotransferase Enzymes Direct Distinct Aspects of Retinal Axon Guidance at the Optic Chiasm , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Buck,et al.  Measurement of centripetal migration of normal corneal epithelial cells in the mouse. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  P. Iannaccone,et al.  Experimental chimeras: current concepts and controversies in normal development and pathogenesis. , 1992, Current topics in developmental biology.

[5]  J. Friend,et al.  Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  P. Tam,et al.  X-chromosome inactivation occurs at different times in different tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[7]  M. Keighren,et al.  Quantitative and spatial information on the composition of chimaeric fetal mouse eyes from single histological sections , 1997, Development, growth & differentiation.

[8]  John D West,et al.  Corneal development, limbal stem cell function, and corneal epithelial cell migration in the Pax6(+/-) mouse. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  M. Yokoyama,et al.  Possible Patterns of Differentiation in the Primitive Ectoderm of C3H/HeNBALB/cA Chimeric Blastocysts: An Inference from Quantitative Analysis of Coat‐Color Patterns , 1991, Development, growth & differentiation.

[10]  D. Price,et al.  Foxg1 regulates retinal axon pathfinding by repressing an ipsilateral program in nasal retina and by causing optic chiasm cells to exert a net axonal growth-promoting activity , 2008, Development.

[11]  B. Masters,et al.  Cell lineage and the differentiation of corneal epithelial cells. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  S. Bramble.  Image analysis for the biological sciences , 1996 .

[13]  S. A. Roach,et al.  The Theory of Random Clumping , 1968 .

[14]  J. West.  Insights into development and genetics from mouse chimeras. , 1999, Current topics in developmental biology.

[15]  C. Tachi.  Quantitative evaluation of coat-color patterns in artificially produced chimeras of the mouse by means of a microcomputer-based video-image analysis system. , 1988, Developmental genetics.

[16]  G. Wilson,et al.  The cell shedding rate of the corneal epithelium--a comparison of collection methods. , 1996, Current eye research.

[17]  M. Oster-Granite,et al.  Cell lineage analysis of cerebellar Purkinje cells in mouse chimeras. , 1981, Developmental biology.

[18]  J. West.  Clonal development of the retinal epithelium in mouse chimaeras and x-inactivation mosaics. , 1976 .

[19]  R. J. Mullen.  Site of pcd gene action and Purkinje cell mosaicism in cerebella of chimaeric mice , 1977, Nature.

[20]  P. Iannaccone,et al.  The histogenesis of the rat adrenal cortex: a study based on histologic analysis of mosaic pattern in chimeras. , 1987, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[21]  J. Howard,et al.  Mosaic pattern and lineage analysis in chimeras. , 1988, Cell differentiation and development : the official journal of the International Society of Developmental Biologists.

[22]  J. Scheys,et al.  In search of adrenocortical stem and progenitor cells. , 2009, Endocrine reviews.

[23]  T. Sun,et al.  Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: Implications on epithelial stem cells , 1989, Cell.

[24]  J. West.  Clonal growth versus cell mingling. , 1978, Basic life sciences.

[25]  J. West.  Patches in the livers of chimaeric mice. , 1976, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[26]  M. Nesbitt.  Chimeras vs X inactivation mosaics: significance of differences in pigment distribution. , 1974, Developmental biology.

[27]  B. Dhillon,et al.  Clonal analysis of patterns of growth, stem cell activity, and cell movement during the development and maintenance of the murine corneal epithelium , 2002, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[28]  R. Mort,et al.  Mosaic analysis of stem cell function and wound healing in the mouse corneal epithelium , 2009, BMC Developmental Biology.

[29]  F. Kruse.  Stem cells and corneal epithelial regeneration , 1994, Eye.