What sort of science education do we really need?

The research aims to explore the role of science for employees in science-based industries and for members of the public interacting with science in their everyday lives. Case studies were carried out in a small sample of industries, in community action groups and in personal decision making. The methodology, informed by a tentative model of science, included scrutiny of available relevant documentation and semi-structured interviews. The findings suggest that procedural understanding was essential in the higher levels of industry and in interacting effectively with everyday issues, while conceptual understanding was so specific that it was acquired in a need-to-know way. The implications for science education hinge on a substantial reduction in the conceptual content and the explicit teaching of the nature of evidence (procedural understanding). The authors suggest building on primary pupils' enthusiasm for investigative work at UK Key Stage 3 (11-14 years) and developing an issues-based curriculum at Key Stage 4 (14-16 years).

[1]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[2]  Horack,et al.  Pupils and Parents , 1936 .

[3]  M. Coles.  Science education : vocational and general approaches , 1997 .

[4]  Steven Epstein,et al.  The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials , 1995, Science, technology & human values.

[5]  M. Young,et al.  Science in Post-Compulsory Education: Towards a Framework for a Curriculum of the Future , 1998 .

[6]  R. Tytler,et al.  Public participation in an environmental dispute: Implications for science education , 2001 .

[7]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Rationality and ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and nuclear decisions in Britain , 1982 .

[8]  etc.,et al.  Inarticulate Science?: Perspectives on the Public Understanding of Science and Some Implications for Science Education , 1993 .

[9]  Richard Gott,et al.  Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum , 1994 .

[10]  P. Fensham.  Student response to the TIMSS test , 1998 .

[11]  Kent Goshorn.  Social rationality, risk, and the right to know: information leveraging with the Toxics Release Inventory , 1996 .

[12]  Philip Johnson,et al.  What do Practising Applied Scientists do and What are the Implications for Science Education , 1999 .

[13]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  School science and its problems with scientific literacy , 1997 .

[14]  R. Tytler.  Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education , 2001 .

[15]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[16]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the internet: the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .

[17]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Pupils' and parents' views of the school science curriculum , 2000 .