Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning

When planning their transport policy, cities usually focus on developing sustainable transport systems and reducing the negative consequences of transport. One way to deliver transport policies is to use the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), a strategic document designed to meet the demand for mobility whilst ensuring adequate quality of life for the residents. The process of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning (SUMP process) can be supported by using a transport model. The objective of this article is to analyse the efficacy of the Multilevel Model of Transport Systems—referred to by its acronym, MST—for the SUMP process. With its ability to represent the transport system’s behaviour depending on the level of detail, the MST can significantly benefit the SUMP process. The proposed concept of integration of the MST into the SUMP process has already been tested and applied in delivering Gdynia’s (Poland) SUMP. The paper suggests ways to use the MST at different levels of planning and modelling and describes the outcomes. Using the multilevel structure helps to fully realise the transport model’s potential to improve the effectiveness of urban mobility planning. The conclusions show that the methods proposed in the article are worthwhile and cities should consider them when planning the SUMP process.

[1]  Julio A. Soria-Lara Handbook on transport and urban planning in the developed world , 2016 .

[2]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  The Future of Transportation Modeling , 2005 .

[3]  Karl Georg Høyer,et al.  The ecological footprints of fuels , 2005 .

[4]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Travel behaviour and health: A conceptual model and research agenda , 2016 .

[5]  Aruna Sivakumar,et al.  MODELLING TRANSPORT: A Synthesis of Transport Modelling Methodologies , 2007 .

[6]  Sergio Montero,et al.  Expert-citizens: Producing and contesting sustainable mobility policy in Mexican cities , 2017 .

[7]  R. Hickman,et al.  Planning more for sustainable mobility , 2013 .

[8]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Scenario Planning for Sustainability in Stockholm, Sweden: Environmental Justice Considerations , 2011 .

[9]  Jan Anne Annema,et al.  The History of the Transport Future—Evaluating Dutch Transport Scenarios of the Past , 2011 .

[10]  P. Moriarty,et al.  Low-mobility: The future of transport , 2008 .

[11]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity? , 2016 .

[12]  D. Banister Cities, mobility and climate change , 2011 .

[13]  Belkacem Ould Bouamama,et al.  Multilevel Modeling of the Traffic Dynamic , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  R. Hickman,et al.  Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable , 2013 .

[15]  Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,et al.  Different Pathways for Achieving Cleaner Urban Areas: A Roadmap towards the White Paper Goal for Urban Transport☆ , 2016 .

[16]  Georgia Pozoukidou,et al.  Integration of LUTI models into Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) , 2016 .

[17]  Leszek Czapkowski,et al.  Methods of Modeling the Bicycle Traffic Flows on the Roundabouts , 2010, TST.

[18]  Todd Litman,et al.  MEASURING TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC, MOBILITY, AND ACCESSIBILITY , 2003 .

[19]  Simon Shepherd,et al.  Optimal transport strategies for European cities , 2000 .

[20]  R. Cervero MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[21]  H. Williams On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[22]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning , 2011 .

[23]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[24]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Sustainable mobility: Six research routes to steer transport policy , 2015, Nature.

[25]  T. J. Wallington,et al.  Diesel vehicles and sustainable mobility in the U.S , 2013 .

[26]  Susanne Böhler-Baedeker,et al.  Citizen and stakeholder involvement: a precondition for sustainable urban mobility , 2014 .

[27]  K. Martens,et al.  Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets? , 2016 .

[28]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Modelling land use and transport policies to measure their contribution to urban challenges: the case of Madrid. , 2017 .

[29]  Giuseppe Inturri,et al.  Towards a decision-support procedure to foster stakeholder involvement and acceptability of urban freight transport policies , 2017, European Transport Research Review.

[30]  Tuuli Toivonen,et al.  Do suburban residents prefer the fastest or low-carbon travel modes? Combining public participation GIS and multimodal travel time analysis for daily mobility research , 2014 .

[31]  Nigel Waters,et al.  The internet, GIS and public participation in transportation planning , 2005 .

[32]  Angela Wilkinson,et al.  LIVING IN THE FUTURES , 2013 .

[33]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Land-use planning: Implications for transport sustainability , 2016 .

[34]  Michael Lowry,et al.  A model for public involvement in transportation improvement programming using participatory Geographic Information Systems , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[35]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  GRADUATED LICENSING IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[36]  Jacek Oskarbski,et al.  Information System for Drivers Within the Integrated Traffic Management System - TRISTAR , 2015, TST.

[37]  Luigi Atzori,et al.  Dynamic Carpooling in Urban Areas: Design and Experimentation with a Multi-Objective Route Matching Algorith , 2017 .

[38]  Mongkut Piantanakulchai,et al.  EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING USING MULTI-STAKEHOLDERS MULTI-OBJECTIVES AHP MODELING , 2003 .

[39]  R Singh,et al.  IMPROVED SPEED-FLOW RELATIONSHIPS: APPLICATION TO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODELS , 2002 .