Assessment of the quality of TROPOMI high-spatial-resolution NO2 data products in the Greater Toronto Area

Abstract. The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) aboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite (launched on 13 October 2017) is a nadir-viewing spectrometer measuring reflected sunlight in the ultraviolet, visible, near-infrared, and shortwave infrared spectral ranges. The measured spectra are used to retrieve total columns of trace gases, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2). For ground validation of these satellite measurements, Pandora spectrometers, which retrieve high-quality NO2 total columns via direct-sun measurements, are widely used. In this study, Pandora NO2 measurements made at three sites located in or north of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) are used to evaluate the TROPOMI NO2 data products, including a standard Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 data product and a TROPOMI research data product developed by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) using a high-resolution regional air quality forecast model (in the air mass factor calculation). It is found that these current TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 data products (standard and ECCC) met the TROPOMI design bias requirement (< 10 %). Using the statistical uncertainty estimation method, the estimated TROPOMI upper-limit precision falls below the design requirement at a rural site but above in the other two urban and suburban sites. The Pandora instruments are found to have sufficient precision (< 0.02 DU) to perform TROPOMI validation work. In addition to the traditional satellite validation method (i.e., pairing ground-based measurements with satellite measurements closest in time and space), we analyzed TROPOMI pixels located upwind and downwind from the Pandora site. This makes it possible to improve the statistics and better interpret the high-spatial-resolution measurements made by TROPOMI. By using this wind-based validation technique, the number of coincident measurements can be increased by about a factor of 5. With this larger number of coincident measurements, this work shows that both TROPOMI and Pandora instruments can reveal detailed spatial patterns (i.e., horizontal distributions) of local and transported NO2 emissions, which can be used to evaluate regional air quality changes. The TROPOMI ECCC NO2 research data product shows improved agreement with Pandora measurements compared to the TROPOMI standard tropospheric NO2 data product (e.g., lower multiplicative bias at the suburban and urban sites by about 10 %), demonstrating benefits from the high-resolution regional air quality forecast model.

[1]  H. Eskes,et al.  Comparison of TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 Precursor NO2 observations with ground-based measurements in Helsinki , 2020 .

[2]  S. Kinne,et al.  Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO2 products , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[3]  Maria Tzortziou,et al.  Underestimation of column NO2 amounts from the OMI satellite compared to diurnally varying ground-based retrievals from multiple PANDORA spectrometer instruments , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  F. Goutail,et al.  Assessing the impact of clouds on ground-based UV–visible total column ozone measurements in the high Arctic , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[5]  C. McLinden,et al.  Retrieval of total column and surface NO2 from Pandora zenith-sky measurements , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  Mengistu Wolde,et al.  High‐Resolution Mapping of Nitrogen Dioxide With TROPOMI: First Results and Validation Over the Canadian Oil Sands , 2019, Geophysical research letters.

[7]  K. Sun,et al.  A physics-based approach to oversample multi-satellite, multispecies observations to a common grid , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[8]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO2 retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[9]  Pepijn Veefkind,et al.  Pre-launch calibration results of the TROPOMI payload on-board the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[10]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Estimates of the Global Burden of Ambient PM2.5, Ozone, and NO2 on Asthma Incidence and Emergency Room Visits , 2018, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  Improved slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV: intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[12]  M. Moran,et al.  Impact of chemical lateral boundary conditions in a regional air quality forecast model on surface ozone predictions during stratospheric intrusions , 2018 .

[13]  A. Bais,et al.  MAX-DOAS NO 2 observations over Guangzhou, China; ground-based and satellite comparisons , 2017 .

[14]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Multi-source SO 2 emission retrievals and consistency of satellite and surface measurements with reported emissions , 2017 .

[15]  Nickolay A. Krotkov,et al.  The version 3 OMI NO 2 standard product , 2017 .

[16]  D. Degenstein,et al.  An efficient algorithm for polarization in the SASKTRAN radiative transfer framework , 2017 .

[17]  L. G. Tilstra,et al.  The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space , 2017 .

[18]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  High‐resolution NO2 observations from the Airborne Compact Atmospheric Mapper: Retrieval and validation , 2017 .

[19]  A. Thompson,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of ground and satellite column measurements of NO2 and O3 over the Atlantic Ocean during the Deposition of Atmospheric Nitrogen to Coastal Ecosystems Experiment , 2016 .

[20]  K. Strong,et al.  Accuracy, precision, and temperature dependence of Pandora total ozone measurements estimated from a comparison with the Brewer triad in Toronto , 2016 .

[21]  Yang Wang,et al.  Structural uncertainty in air mass factor calculation for NO2 and HCHO satellite retrievals , 2016 .

[22]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  Comparison of OMI NO 2 observations and their seasonal and weekly cycles with ground-based measurements in Helsinki , 2016 .

[23]  A. Bais,et al.  Comparisons of ground-based tropospheric NO 2 MAX-DOAS measurements to satellite observations with the aid of an air quality model over the Thessaloniki area, Greece , 2016 .

[24]  Holger Sihler,et al.  How big is an OMI pixel , 2016 .

[25]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  The high-resolution version of TM5-MP for optimized satellite retrievals: description and validation , 2016 .

[26]  R. Martin,et al.  Space-based detection of missing sulfur dioxide sources of global air pollution , 2016 .

[27]  Abdul Razzak Rumane,et al.  Assessment of Quality , 2016 .

[28]  Jack Chen,et al.  The FireWork air quality forecast system with near-real-time biomass burning emissions: Recent developments and evaluation of performance for the 2015 North American wildfire season , 2016, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[29]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Comparison of ozone retrievals from the Pandora spectrometer system and Dobson spectrophotometer in Boulder, Colorado , 2015 .

[30]  D. Degenstein,et al.  High-resolution and Monte Carlo additions to the SASKTRAN radiative transfer model , 2015 .

[31]  N. A. Krotkov,et al.  Revising the slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2015, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[32]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Lifetimes and emissions of SO2 from point sources estimated from OMI , 2015 .

[33]  James F. Gleason,et al.  Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO 2 column retrievals using in situ and surface-based NO 2 observations , 2014 .

[34]  F. Hendrick,et al.  Improved spectral fitting of nitrogen dioxide from OMI in the 405–465 nm window , 2014 .

[35]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Relationship Between Column-Density and Surface Mixing Ratio: Statistical Analysis of O3 and NO2 Data from the July 2011 Maryland DISCOVER-AQ Mission , 2014 .

[36]  James F. Gleason,et al.  A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments : applications to OMI , 2013 .

[37]  R. Martin,et al.  Improved Satellite Retrievals of NO2 and SO2 over the Canadian Oil Sands and Comparisons with Surface Measurements , 2013 .

[38]  M. Deeter,et al.  Relative changes in CO emissions over megacities based on observations from space , 2013 .

[39]  J. Herman,et al.  Effects of local meteorology and aerosols on ozone and nitrogen dioxide retrievals from OMI and pandora spectrometers in Maryland, USA during DISCOVER-AQ 2011 , 2013, Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry.

[40]  Christian Hermans,et al.  Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of HONO and NO 2 in the Beijing area , 2012 .

[41]  Maria Tzortziou,et al.  High precision, absolute total column ozone measurements from the Pandora spectrometer system: Comparisons with data from a Brewer double monochromator and Aura OMI , 2012 .

[42]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[43]  J. Drummond,et al.  Severe 2011 ozone depletion assessed with 11 years of ozone, NO2, and OClO measurements at 80°N , 2012 .

[44]  Nickolay A. Krotkov,et al.  Estimation of SO2 emissions using OMI retrievals , 2011 .

[45]  Henk Eskes,et al.  An improved tropospheric NO 2 column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2011 .

[46]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[47]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO 2 and O 4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers , 2010 .

[48]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Direct Sun measurements of NO2 column abundances from Table Mountain, California: Intercomparison of low- and high-resolution spectrometers , 2010 .

[49]  Maria Tzortziou,et al.  NO2 column amounts from ground‐based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct‐sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation , 2009 .

[50]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Validation of urban NO 2 concentrations and their diurnal and seasonal variations observed from the SCIAMACHY and OMI sensors using in situ surface measurements in Israeli cities , 2009 .

[51]  H. Tanimoto,et al.  Validation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006: Mount Tai Experiment 2006 , 2008 .

[52]  Quintus Kleipool,et al.  Earth surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data , 2008 .

[53]  James F. Gleason,et al.  Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column densities using direct‐Sun mode Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 2008 .

[54]  J. Veefkind,et al.  Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns , 2008 .

[55]  H. Tanimoto,et al.  Validation of OMI tropospheric NO 2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006 , 2008 .

[56]  M. Toohey,et al.  Estimating biases and error variances through the comparison of coincident satellite measurements , 2007 .

[57]  B. Ramsay,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6720 Enhancements to, and forthcoming developments in the Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) † , 2022 .

[58]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[59]  J. Burrows,et al.  Measurements of nitrogen dioxide total column amounts using a Brewer double spectrophotometer in direct Sun mode , 2006 .

[60]  V. Fioletov,et al.  Estimating ozone variability and instrument uncertainties from SBUV(/2), ozonesonde, Umkehr, and SAGE II measurements: Short‐term variations , 2006 .

[61]  N. C. Strugnell,et al.  First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS , 2002 .

[62]  J. Brion,et al.  Absorption Spectra Measurements for the Ozone Molecule in the 350–830 nm Region , 1998 .

[63]  Ann Carine Vandaele,et al.  Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm−1 to 10 000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K , 1998 .

[64]  Klaus Pfeilsticker,et al.  An intercomparison of ground-based UV-visible sensors of ozone and NO2 , 1997 .

[65]  Alain Sarkissian,et al.  Improvements to the accuracy of measurements of NO2 by zenith-sky visible spectrometers , 1994 .

[66]  Alain Sarkissian,et al.  Improvements to the accuracy of zenith-sky measurements of total ozone by visible spectrometers , 1994 .

[67]  J. Brion,et al.  High-resolution laboratory absorption cross section of O3. Temperature effect , 1993 .

[68]  J. Brion,et al.  Ozone UV spectroscopy I: Absorption cross-sections at room temperature , 1992 .

[69]  J. Garratt.  The Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1992 .

[70]  D. H. Stedman,et al.  Direct measurements of ozone and nitrogen dioxide photolysis rates in the troposphere , 1980 .

[71]  J. Noxon,et al.  Nitrogen Dioxide in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Measured by Ground-Based Absorption Spectroscopy , 1975, Science.

[72]  Frank E. Grubbs,et al.  On Estimating Precision of Measuring Instruments and Product Variability , 1948 .

[73]  H. Eskes,et al.  Comparison of TROPOMI/Sentinel 5 Precursor NO2 observations with ground-based measurements in Helsinki , 2019 .

[74]  A. Bais,et al.  MAX-DOAS NO2 observations over Guangzhou, China; ground-based and satellite comparisons , 2017 .

[75]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  The Cabauw Intercomparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI): design, execution, and early results , 2011 .

[76]  Adam E. Bourassa,et al.  SASKTRAN: A spherical geometry radiative transfer code for efficient estimation of limb scattered sunlight , 2008 .

[77]  U. Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) , 1994 .

[78]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) , 1994 .