Dissociation of Antimicrobial and Hemolytic Activities in Cyclic Peptide Diastereomers by Systematic Alterations in Amphipathicity*

We have investigated the role of amphipathicity in a homologous series of head-to-tail cyclic antimicrobial peptides in efforts to delineate features resulting in high antimicrobial activity coupled with low hemolytic activity (i.e. a high therapeutic index). The peptide GS14, cyclo(VKLKVd-YPLKVKLd-YP), designed on the basis of gramicidin S (GS), exists in a preformed highly amphipathic β-sheet conformation and was used as the base compound for this study. Fourteen diastereomers of GS14 were synthesized; each contained a different single enantiomeric substitution within the framework of GS14. The β-sheet structure of all GS14 diastereomers was disrupted as determined by CD and NMR spectroscopy under aqueous conditions; however, all diastereomers exhibited differential structure inducibility in hydrophobic environments. Because the diastereomers all have the same composition, sequence, and intrinsic hydrophobicity, the amphipathicity of the diastereomers could be ranked based upon retention time from reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. There was a clear correlation showing that high amphipathicity resulted in high hemolytic activity and low antimicrobial activity in the diastereomers. The latter may be the result of increased affinity of highly amphipathic peptides to outer membrane components of Gram-negative microorganisms. The diastereomers possessing the most favorable therapeutic indices possessed some of the lowest amphipathicities, although there was a threshold value below which antimicrobial activity decreased. The best diastereomer exhibited 130-fold less hemolytic activity compared with GS14, as well as greatly increased antimicrobial activities, resulting in improvement in therapeutic indices of between 1,000- and 10,000-fold for a number of microorganisms. The therapeutic indices of this peptide were between 16- and 32-fold greater than GS for Gram-negative microorganisms and represents a significant improvement in specificity over GS. Our findings show that a highly amphipathic nature is not desirable in the design of constrained cyclic antimicrobial peptides and that an optimum amphipathicity can be defined by systematic enantiomeric substitutions.

[1]  S Rackovsky,et al.  Intermolecular anti-parallel beta sheet: Comparison of predicted and observed conformations of gramicidin S. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Hodges,et al.  Nonlamellar phases induced by the interaction of gramicidin S with lipid bilayers. A possible relationship to membrane-disrupting activity. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[3]  D. Osguthorpe,et al.  Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase‐trimethoprim, a drug‐receptor system , 1988, Proteins.

[4]  Jiang Hong,et al.  A Repertoire of Novel Antibacterial Diastereomeric Peptides with Selective Cytolytic Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  M. Tamaki,et al.  Adsorption of cyclic peptides analogous to gramicidin S and gratisin onto octadecylsilica stationary phase and bacterial cells. , 1987, Journal of chromatography.

[6]  R. Hancock,et al.  Use of the fluorescent probe 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine to study the interactions of aminoglycoside antibiotics with the outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  M. Woolfson,et al.  The crystal structure of a hydrated gramicidin S–urea complex , 1978, Nature.

[8]  R. Hancock,et al.  Cationic peptides: a new source of antibiotics. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  R. Hancock,et al.  Alteration of susceptibility to EDTA, polymyxin B and gentamicin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by divalent cation regulation of outer membrane protein H1. , 1983, Journal of general microbiology.

[10]  C. Mant,et al.  Effect of preferred binding domains on peptide retention behavior in reversed-phase chromatography: amphipathic alpha-helices. , 1990, Peptide research.

[11]  泉屋 信夫.  Synthetic aspects of biologically active cyclic peptides : gramicidin S and tyrocidines , 1979 .

[12]  R. Hancock.  Aminoglycoside uptake and mode of action-with special reference to streptomycin and gentamicin. II. Effects of aminoglycosides on cells. , 1981, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[13]  M. Waring.  Synthetic aspects of biologically active cyclic peptides—gramicidin S and tyrocidines By N. Izumiya, T. Kato, H. Aoyagi, M. Waki and M. Kondo. Tokyo: Kodansha. New York: John Wiley (Halsted). (1979). 166 pp. $29.95 , 1980, Cell.

[14]  J. Corden,et al.  Structural studies of a synthetic peptide derived from the carboxyl‐terminal domain of RNA polymerase II , 1995, Proteins.

[15]  R. Hancock,et al.  Interaction of polycationic antibiotics with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide and lipid A studied by using dansyl-polymyxin , 1986, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  G. F. Gause,et al.  Gramicidin S and its use in the Treatment of Infected Wounds , 1944, Nature.

[17]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[18]  R. Hodges,et al.  Relationship of sidechain hydrophobicity and α‐helical propensity on the stability of the single‐stranded amphipathic α‐helix , 1995 .

[19]  H. Fabian,et al.  Conformation of a water-soluble beta-sheet model peptide. A circular dichroism and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic study of double D-amino acid replacements. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[20]  E. Krause,et al.  Peptide hydrophobicity controls the activity and selectivity of magainin 2 amide in interaction with membranes. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[21]  E. Krause,et al.  Peptide helicity and membrane surface charge modulate the balance of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with lipid bilayers and biological membranes. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[22]  T. Fujita,et al.  Quantitative structure-hydrophobicity and structure-activity relationships of antibacterial gramicidin S analogs. , 1994, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  C. Mant,et al.  Reversed-phase chromatography of synthetic amphipathic alpha-helical peptides as a model for ligand/receptor interactions. Effect of changing hydrophobic environment on the relative hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of amino acid side-chains. , 1994, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Y. Shai,et al.  Selective lysis of bacteria but not mammalian cells by diastereomers of melittin: structure-function study. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[25]  M. Dathe,et al.  Hydrophobicity, hydrophobic moment and angle subtended by charged residues modulate antibacterial and haemolytic activity of amphipathic helical peptides , 1997, FEBS letters.

[26]  R. Woody,et al.  [4] Circular dichroism , 1995 .

[27]  R. Hodges,et al.  New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[28]  V. T. Ivanov,et al.  Conformational states and biological activity of cyclic peptides , 1975 .

[29]  D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparison of the effects of hydrophobicity, amphiphilicity, and α‐helicity on the activities of antimicrobial peptides , 1995, Proteins.

[30]  Y. Shai,et al.  Diastereomers of Cytolysins, a Novel Class of Potent Antibacterial Peptides (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  F. Young.  Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[32]  David S. Wishart,et al.  Unusual β-sheet periodicity in small cyclic peptides , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[33]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  R. Hodges,et al.  Effect of trifluoroethanol on protein secondary structure: an NMR and CD study using a synthetic actin peptide. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[35]  R. Hodges,et al.  Gramicidin S is active against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[36]  R A Houghten,et al.  Design of model amphipathic peptides having potent antimicrobial activities. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[37]  C. Mant,et al.  Prediction of peptide retention times in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography I. Determination of retention coefficients of amino acid residues of model synthetic peptides , 1986 .

[38]  C. Mant,et al.  Hydrophilic interaction/cation-exchange chromatography for separation of amphipathic alpha-helical peptides. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[39]  R. Hodges,et al.  Peptide destabilization by two adjacent D-amino acids in single-stranded amphipathic alpha-helices. , 1996, Peptide research.

[40]  F. Richards,et al.  The chemical shift index: a fast and simple method for the assignment of protein secondary structure through NMR spectroscopy. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[41]  R. Hodges,et al.  Modulation of Structure and Antibacterial and Hemolytic Activity by Ring Size in Cyclic Gramicidin S Analogs* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  F. Blanco,et al.  NMR solution structure of the isolated N-terminal fragment of protein-G B1 domain. Evidence of trifluoroethanol induced native-like beta-hairpin formation. , 1994, Biochemistry.