Marginal fit and surface roughness of crowns made with an accelerated casting technique.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Conventional investing and casting techniques following the manufactures' recommendations are time-consuming. Accelerated casting techniques have been reported, but their accuracy has not been adequately studied for complete crown castings. PURPOSE This study evaluated the marginal fit and surface roughness of complete crowns made with a conventional and an accelerated casting technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Part I of the study determined the mean time interval required for each investment to reach its maximum exothermic setting reaction temperature. Part II determined the marginal discrepancy of standardized complete crowns cast in a high noble metal ceramic alloy, with the use of four phosphate-bonded investments. A conventional technique (as recommended by the manufacturer) was compared with an accelerated technique that used 13- to 17-minute bench set time (as determined in part 1 for each investment)_ and 15-minute wax elimination cycle in a 815 degrees C (1500 degrees F) preheated furnace. Part III evaluated the surface roughness of castings made with the same techniques as in part II. RESULTS For the marginal discrepancy and surface roughness, crowns fabricated with the accelerated casting technique were not significantly (P > 0.05) different from those fabricated with the conventional technique. CONCLUSION The accelerated casting technique described in this study could be a vital alternative to the time-consuming conventional techniques.

[1]  J H Bailey,et al.  Post-and-core assemblies made with an accelerated pattern elimination technique. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[3]  Takao Fusayama,et al.  Factors and technique of precision casting part II , 1959 .

[4]  W V Campagni,et al.  An accelerated technique for casting post and core restorations. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  R. Phillips,et al.  Dimensional Change in Wax Patterns During Setting of Gypsum Investments , 1958, Journal of dental research.

[6]  H. Ogura,et al.  Inner surface roughness of complete cast crowns made by centrifugal casting machines. , 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  G. Christensen Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. , 1966, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  R. Phillips,et al.  Distortion of wax patterns as influenced by storage time, storage temperature, and temperature of wax manipulation. , 1950, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  Y Yokoyama,et al.  Effects of rapid burnout type gypsum-bonded investment on performance of castings. Part 1. Surface aspects and fit of crowns. , 1994, Dental materials journal.

[10]  R L Schneider,et al.  A one-appointment procedure for cast post and core restorations. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  D. W. Jones Setting and hygroscopic expansion of investments , 1970, British Dental Journal.

[12]  D R Davis Effect of wet and dry cellulose ring liners on setting expansion and compressive strength of a gypsum-bonded investment. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  R G Verrett,et al.  The effect of sprue attachment design on castability and porosity. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  A. Caputo,et al.  Surface smoothness and marginal fit with phosphate-bonded investments. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  Y. Oshida,et al.  Effect of selected physical properties of waxes on investments and casting shrinkage. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  W J O'BRIEN,et al.  Decomposition of Gypsum Investment in the Presence of Carbon , 1959, Journal of dental research.

[17]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[18]  Dedmon Hw Disparity in expert opinions on size of acceptable margin openings. , 1982 .

[19]  R Earnshaw,et al.  The Effect of Casting Ring Liners on the Potential Expansion of a Gypsum-bonded Investment , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[20]  M. Yamane [Surface roughness of castings made by various casting techniques]. , 1971, Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japan Research Society of Dental Materials & Appliances.

[21]  W V Campagni,et al.  A comparison of an accelerated technique for casting post-and-core restorations with conventional techniques. , 1993, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  W Finger,et al.  Effect of thickness of peridental restorations on the casting precision. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[23]  G. L. Slack,et al.  Surface roughness of dental castings. , 1950, Journal of the American Dental Association.