Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing

In contrast to static sounds, spatially dynamic sounds have received little attention in psychoacoustic research so far. This holds true especially for acoustically complex (reverberant, multisource) conditions and impaired hearing. The current study therefore investigated the influence of reverberation and the number of concurrent sound sources on source movement detection in young normal-hearing (YNH) and elderly hearing-impaired (EHI) listeners. A listening environment based on natural environmental sounds was simulated using virtual acoustics and rendered over headphones. Both near-far (‘radial’) and left-right (‘angular’) movements of a frontal target source were considered. The acoustic complexity was varied by adding static lateral distractor sound sources as well as reverberation. Acoustic analyses confirmed the expected changes in stimulus features that are thought to underlie radial and angular source movements under anechoic conditions and suggested a special role of monaural spectral changes under reverberant conditions. Analyses of the detection thresholds showed that, with the exception of the single-source scenarios, the EHI group was less sensitive to source movements than the YNH group, despite adequate stimulus audibility. Adding static sound sources clearly impaired the detectability of angular source movements for the EHI (but not the YNH) group. Reverberation, on the other hand, clearly impaired radial source movement detection for the EHI (but not the YNH) listeners. These results illustrate the feasibility of studying factors related to auditory movement perception with the help of the developed test setup.

[1]  Virginia Best,et al.  Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Josh H. McDermott The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[3]  Fons Adriaensen A Tetrahedral Microphone Processor for Ambisonic Recording Fons ADRIAENSEN , 2007 .

[4]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Development and Validation of a Method for Predicting the Perceived Naturalness of Sounds Subjected to Spectral Distortion , 2004 .

[5]  A. Bronkhorst,et al.  Auditory distance perception in humans : A summary of past and present research , 2005 .

[6]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Database of Multichannel In-Ear and Behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[7]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[8]  A D Musicant,et al.  Influence of monaural spectral cues on binaural localization. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Daniel,et al.  Représentation de champs acoustiques, application à la transmission et à la reproduction de scènes sonores complexes dans un contexte multimédia , 2000 .

[10]  Giso Grimm,et al.  The master hearing Aid : A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation , 2006 .

[11]  J. A. Altman,et al.  Monaural and binaural perception of approaching and withdrawing auditory images in humans , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[12]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[13]  Tapio Lokki,et al.  Creating Interactive Virtual Acoustic Environments , 1999 .

[14]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Auditory Distance Perception , 2012 .

[15]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  E. S. Malinina,et al.  Asymmetry and spatial specificity of auditory aftereffects following adaptation to signals simulating approach and withdrawal of sound sources , 2014, Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology.

[17]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[18]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Spatial Acoustic Scenarios in Multichannel Loudspeaker Systems for Hearing Aid Evaluation. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Auditory model based direction estimation of concurrent speakers from binaural signals , 2011, Speech Commun..

[21]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[22]  Christoph Pörschmann,et al.  Investigations into Velocity and Distance Perception Based on Different Types of Moving Sound Sources with Respect to Auditory Virtual Environments , 2014, J. Virtual Real. Broadcast..

[23]  Simon Carlile,et al.  The Perception of Auditory Motion , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[24]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[25]  I. G. Andreeva,et al.  Auditory aftereffects of approaching and withdrawing sound sources: Dependence on the trajectory and location of adapting stimuli , 2013, Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology.

[26]  Jerome Daniel,et al.  Further Investigations of High-Order Ambisonics and Wavefield Synthesis for Holophonic Sound Imaging , 2003 .

[27]  Simon Carlile,et al.  Effects of Virtual Speaker Density and Room Reverberation on Spatiotemporal Thresholds of Audio-Visual Motion Coherence , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Perceptual bias for rising tones , 1998, Nature.

[29]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Auditory distance perception in rooms , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  Assessment of auditory spatial awareness in complex listening environments. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  I. G. Andreeva,et al.  The auditory aftereffects of radial sound source motion with different velocities , 2011, Human Physiology.

[32]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Evaluation of spatial audio reproduction schemes for application in hearing aid research , 2015, ArXiv.

[35]  R. Plomp,et al.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[37]  John J Soraghan,et al.  Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Virginia Best,et al.  A Method for Assessing Auditory Spatial Analysis in Reverberant Multitalker Environments. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[39]  Michael A Akeroyd,et al.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain , 2002, Current Biology.