Inferences and Indices: Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes

Institutionalists commonly assume that the operation of regimes accounts for much of what happens in international society. Realists and neorealists, by contrast, typically regard institutions as epiphenomena that reflect deeper forces in international society and that can be expected to change when the deeper forces change. As is so often the case in debates of this nature, the truth no doubt lies somewhere between these polar perspectives. To identify the signal of the effects of institutions and especially to track variations in the strength of this signal, we need to find ways to draw clearcut inferences about the causal links between institutions and collective outcomes at the international level. Ideally, we should also devise an integrated index of regime effectiveness that would allow us to compare and contrast different regimes or the same regimes over time in terms of their effectiveness. This article offers a critical review of the leading efforts to develop useful inferences and indices with particular reference to international environmental regimes. It concludes that our efforts in this realm to date have yielded only modestthough hardly trivialresults. Yet we are far from exhausting the available analytic resources in this field, and there is much that can be done to improve inferences and indices in this important area of research in the future.

[1]  Oran R. Young Hitting the Mark , 1999 .

[2]  M. Levy International cooperation to combat acid rain , 1995 .

[3]  Detlef F. Sprinz,et al.  The Effect of Global Environmental Regimes: A Measurement Concept , 1999 .

[4]  J. Mearsheimer Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War , 1990 .

[5]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[6]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives , 1996 .

[7]  F. Biermann Strengthening Green Global Governance in a Disparate World SocietyWould a World Environment Organisation Benefit the South? , 2002, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[8]  J. Reid,et al.  Protecting the Ozone Layer , 1998 .

[9]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[10]  J. Wettestad Designing Effective Environmental Regimes: The Key Conditions , 1999 .

[11]  G. Wetstone,et al.  Acid rain in Europe and North America. , 1983 .

[12]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[13]  E. Nagel The structure of science : problems in the logic of scientific explanation , 1961 .

[14]  E. Kolb A framework for political analysis , 1978 .

[15]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders , 1998, International Organization.

[16]  J. Allison The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice . Edited by David G. Victor, Kal Raustiala, and Eugene B. Skolnikoff. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. 737p. $27.50. , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Edith Brown Weiss,et al.  Engaging countries : strengthening compliance with international environmental accords , 1998 .

[18]  R. Pielke The Endangered Atmosphere: Preserving a Global Commons , 1998 .

[19]  M. Olson Power And Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist And Capitalist Dictatorships , 1999 .

[20]  C. May,et al.  ‘Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis’, 1982 , 2002 .

[21]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science , 1991, World Politics.