Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum

Scientists and researchers in many disciplines frequently resort to modeling and model–based reasoning to concretize abstract ideas, to simplify and clarify complex phenomena, to predict trends, and to explain mechanisms and processes. National projects working to reform science education explicitly recommend the development of an appreciation for the centrality of models in the teaching and learning of science. This article describes a model–centered, computer–supported, semester–long science curriculum for middle–school students designed to encourage conceptual understanding and to foster the development of model–based reasoning skills. In the Model–based Analysis and Reasoning in Science (MARS) project, an attempt is made to create an environment conducive to fostering conceptual understanding and reasoning about scientific phenomena that involve “balance of forces.” Visual models that are dynamic and interactive are presented not only to concretize abstract ideas but also as reasoning tools that give students the leverage to solve problems in a variety of contexts. This model–centered curriculum focuses on a network of concepts important for understanding hydrostatics; that is, floating and sinking, as an exemplar for the general principle of balance of forces. How students understand these concepts and use models as a disciplinary resource to engage in chains of reasoning that integrate concepts into networks of relations is of special interest for study. How students use that understanding in new situations within the same explanatory system is also being studied. A major pedagogical question is how middle–school students can be taught to engage in model–based reasoning, a form of reasoning that scientists routinely use. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

[1]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .

[2]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  J. Clement.  Learning via Model Construction and Criticism , 1989 .

[4]  R. Mayer.  Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[6]  A. Giordan,et al.  The Importance of Modelling in the Teaching and Popularization of Science. , 1991 .

[7]  S. Carey.  Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[8]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory. , 1989 .

[9]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Modeling instruction in mechanics , 1987 .

[10]  John J. Clement,et al.  A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students , 1983 .

[11]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[12]  J. Snir,et al.  Sink or float—what do the experts think?: The historical development of explanations for floatation , 1991 .

[13]  Ann C.H. Kindfield,et al.  Biology Diagrams: Tools to Think With , 1994 .

[14]  D. Hestenes.  Modeling games in the Newtonian World , 1992 .

[15]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[16]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. Working Paper ES-19. , 1984 .

[17]  B. White.  ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[18]  E. Finkel,et al.  Science as Model Building: Computers and High-School Genetics , 1992 .

[19]  R. Driver.  Pupils’ Alternative Frameworks in Science , 1981 .

[20]  J. Kaput.  Notations and Representations as Mediators of Constructive Processes , 1991 .

[21]  D. Psillos,et al.  Understanding Pressure: Didactical Transpositions and Pupils' Conceptions. , 1990 .

[22]  D. Hestenes.  Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[23]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[24]  G. Andaloro,et al.  Modelling in physics teaching: the role of computer simulation , 1991 .

[25]  Ann C. H. Kindfield.  Understanding a basic biological process: Expert and novice models of meiosis , 1994 .

[26]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[27]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Using Conceptual Models to Facilitate Conceptual Change: The Case of Weight-Density Differentiation , 1992 .