Secondhand exposure to e-cigarette aerosols among smokers: A cross-sectional study in six European countries of the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys

INTRODUCTION Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has grown significantly in some European Union (EU) Member States (MS). A better understanding of the exposure to secondhand e-cigarette aerosols (SHA) is necessary to develop and implement comprehensive regulations on e-cigarette use in public places. This study aims to assess the observation of e-cigarette use in public places, the self-reported exposure to SHA, and the level of users’ comfort using e-cigarettes in the presence of others. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of the Wave 1 International Tobacco Control 6 European Countries Survey recruiting adult smokers (n=6011) across six EU MS: Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Spain, within the EURESTPLUS Project. A descriptive analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence (%) of observed e-cigarette use in different places, frequency of self-reported exposure to SHA, and level of comfort using e-cigarettes in the presence of others. RESULTS In all, 31.0% of smokers observed others using e-cigarette in public places, 19.7% in indoor places where smoking is banned, and 14.5% indoors at work. Almost 37% of smokers reported to be ever exposed to SHA, ranging from 17.7% in Spain to 63.3% in Greece. The higher prevalence of observed e-cigarette use and passive exposure to SHA was reported by smokers of younger age, of higher educational level and those being current or former e-cigarette users. Part (8.8%) of the smokers who were also e-cigarette users reported feeling uncomfortable using e-cigarettes in the presence of others. CONCLUSIONS A third of smokers from six EU MS reported being exposed to SHA. Prevalence differences were observed among the countries. In the context of scarce evidence on long-term health effects of exposure to SHA, precautionary regulations protecting bystanders from involuntary exposure should be developed.

[1]  E. Fernández,et al.  Secondhand exposure to aerosol from electronic cigarettes: pilot study of assessment of tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL) in urine. , 2019, Gaceta sanitaria.

[2]  E. Fernández,et al.  The Conceptual Model and Methods of Wave 1 (2016) of the EUREST-PLUS ITC 6 European Countries Survey , 2018, Tobacco induced diseases.

[3]  E. Fernández,et al.  Study Protocol of European Regulatory Science on Tobacco (EUREST-PLUS): Policy implementation to reduce lung disease , 2018, Tobacco induced diseases.

[4]  R. Borland,et al.  Acceptance and patterns of personal vaporizer use in Australia and the United Kingdom: Results from the International Tobacco Control survey. , 2018, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[5]  S. Gallus,et al.  Passive exposure to electronic cigarette aerosol in Italy: data from the TackSHS pan-European survey , 2018, Tobacco Prevention & Cessation.

[6]  D. Bettcher,et al.  Correlates of compliance with national comprehensive smoke-free laws , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[7]  E. Fernández,et al.  E-cigarette use and support for banning e-cigarette use in public places in the European Union. , 2017, Preventive medicine.

[8]  E. Dzięciołowska-Baran,et al.  Electronic Cigarettes and Awareness of Their Health Effects. , 2017, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[9]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes: Assessing Vapers' Intake of Toxic Compounds, Secondhand Exposures, and the Associated Health Impacts. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  T. Tabuchi,et al.  Electronic cigarette use in restaurants and workplaces where combustible tobacco smoking is not allowed: an Internet survey in Japan , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[11]  N. Wilson,et al.  Should e-cigarette use be included in indoor smoking bans? , 2017, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  Jennifer L. Pearson,et al.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review. , 2017, American journal of preventive medicine.

[13]  K. Merakou,et al.  Prevalence and determinants of current and secondhand smoking in Greece: results from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) study , 2017, BMJ Open.

[14]  Joanna E Cohen,et al.  Global approaches to regulating electronic cigarettes , 2016, Tobacco Control.

[15]  M. Man,et al.  Opinions and practices regarding electronic cigarette use among Romanian high school students. , 2016, Gaceta sanitaria.

[16]  Cabral A. Bigman,et al.  Perceived Harm of Secondhand Electronic Cigarette Vapors and Policy Support to Restrict Public Vaping: Results From a National Survey of US Adults. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[17]  A. Capon,et al.  A systematic review of the health risks from passive exposure to electronic cigarette vapour. , 2016, Public health research & practice.

[18]  F. Fischer,et al.  Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure in different settings: Results from the German Health Update (GEDA) 2012 , 2016, BMC Public Health.

[19]  C. Vardavas,et al.  Relationship of secondhand smoke exposure with sociodemographic factors and smoke-free legislation in the European Union. , 2016, European journal of public health.

[20]  E. Fernández,et al.  Perception of electronic cigarettes in the general population: does their usefulness outweigh their risks? , 2015, BMJ Open.

[21]  Cabral A. Bigman,et al.  Is exposure to e-cigarette communication associated with perceived harms of e-cigarette secondhand vapour? Results from a national survey of US adults , 2015, BMJ Open.

[22]  M. Goniewicz,et al.  Electronic cigarettes are a source of thirdhand exposure to nicotine. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[23]  Brian A. King,et al.  Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[24]  E. Fernández,et al.  Attitudes towards Electronic Cigarettes Regulation in Indoor Workplaces and Selected Public and Private Places: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  E-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in Italy: a national representative survey. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[26]  E. Fernández,et al.  Cigarettes vs. e-cigarettes: Passive exposure at home measured by means of airborne marker and biomarkers. , 2014, Environmental research.

[27]  Simon Chapman,et al.  E-cigarettes: the best and the worst case scenarios for public health—an essay by Simon Chapman , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  C. Vardavas,et al.  Determinants and prevalence of e-cigarette use throughout the European Union: a secondary analysis of 26 566 youth and adults from 27 Countries , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[29]  Pamela M Ling,et al.  "Smoking revolution": a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  Brian A. King,et al.  Smoke-Free Rules and Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Homes and Vehicles Among US Adults, 2009–2010 , 2012, Preventing chronic disease.

[31]  Raydel Valdés Salgado,et al.  [The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control]. , 2003, Salud publica de Mexico.

[32]  E. Fernández,et al.  Gender and educational differences in smoking initiation rates in Spain from 1948 to 1992. , 2003, European journal of public health.

[33]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[34]  Laura A. Gibson,et al.  Measuring perceptions related to e-cigarettes: Important principles and next steps to enhance study validity. , 2018, Addictive behaviors.

[35]  Lung Disease,et al.  Position statement on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems. , 2014, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[36]  J. Catania,et al.  Random Selection in a National Telephone Survey: A Comparison of the Kish, Next-Birthday, and Last-Birthday Methods , 2000 .

[37]  S Chapman,et al.  Tobacco Control , 1992, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.