Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird.

Intertidal habitats provide important feeding areas for migratory shorebirds. Anthropogenic developments along coasts can increase ambient light levels at night across adjacent inter-tidal zones. Here, we report the effects of elevated nocturnal light levels upon the foraging strategy of a migratory shorebird (common redshank Tringa totanus) overwintering on an industrialised estuary in Northern Europe. To monitor behaviour across the full intertidal area, individuals were located by day and night using VHF transmitters, and foraging behaviour was inferred from inbuilt posture sensors. Natural light was scored using moon-phase and cloud cover information and nocturnal artificial light levels were obtained using geo-referenced DMSP/OLS night-time satellite imagery at a 1-km resolution. Under high illumination levels, the commonest and apparently preferred foraging behaviour was sight-based. Conversely, birds feeding in areas with low levels of artificial light had an elevated foraging time and fed by touch, but switched to visual rather than tactile foraging behaviour on bright moonlit nights in the absence of cloud cover. Individuals occupying areas which were illuminated continuously by lighting from a large petrochemical complex invariably exhibited a visually based foraging behaviour independently of lunar phase and cloud cover. We show that ambient light levels affect the timing and distribution of foraging opportunities for redshank. We argue that light emitted from an industrial complex improved nocturnal visibility. This allowed sight-based foraging in place of tactile foraging, implying both a preference for sight-feeding and enhanced night-time foraging opportunities under these conditions. The study highlights the value of integrating remotely sensed data and telemetry techniques to assess the effect of anthropogenic change upon nocturnal behaviour and habitat use.

[1]  B. Ens,et al.  Why oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus cannot meet their daily energy requirements in a single low water period , 1996 .

[2]  M. Pienkowski,et al.  Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Effects of artificial illumination on the nocturnal foraging of waders , 2010 .

[4]  R. Williams,et al.  The Ecology of the Wash. II. Seasonal Variation in the Feeding Conditions of Wading Birds (Charadrii) , 1977 .

[5]  P. Jouventin,et al.  Light-induced mortality of petrels: a 4-year study from Reunion Island (Indian Ocean) , 2002 .

[6]  Alain Leduc,et al.  Conditions and significance of night feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon , 1989 .

[7]  A. Baker,et al.  DAY AND NIGHT FEEDING HABITAT OF RED KNOTS IN PATAGONIA: PROFITABILITY VERSUS SAFETY? , 2001 .

[8]  R. Mcneil,et al.  Comparative day and night feeding strategies of shorebird species in a tropical environment , 2008 .

[9]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Do oystercatchers select the most profitable cockles? , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[11]  P. Drapeau,et al.  THE OCCURRENCE AND ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF NOCTURNAL HABITS IN WATERFOWL , 1992 .

[12]  How starvation risk in Redshanks Tringa totanus results in predation mortality from Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus , 2008 .

[13]  W. Cresswell.  Age-Dependent Choice of Redshank (Tringa totanus) Feeding Location: Profitability or Risk? , 1994 .

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[15]  Michael Salmon,et al.  Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles , 2005 .

[16]  J. Goss‐Custard.  THE WINTER FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE REDSHANK TRINGA TOTANUS , 2008 .

[17]  J. Burger,et al.  Human Activity Influence and Diurnal and Nocturnal Foraging of Sanderlings (Calidris alba) , 1991 .

[18]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[19]  Franz Hölker,et al.  Cloud Coverage Acts as an Amplifier for Ecological Light Pollution in Urban Ecosystems , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  S. Saitoh,et al.  Use of nighttime visible images to detect Japanese common squid Todarodes pacificus fishing areas and potential migration routes in the Sea of Japan , 2004 .

[21]  J. Marchant,et al.  Guide to the Identification and Ageing of Holarctic Waders , 1979 .

[22]  T. Milsom,et al.  Activity patterns of Lapwings Vanellus vanellus in relation to the lunar cycle , 1990 .

[23]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  The energetic importance of night foraging for waders wintering in a temperate estuary , 2008 .

[24]  Paul A Murtaugh,et al.  Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[25]  Boulder,et al.  The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness , 2001, astro-ph/0108052.

[26]  G. Tana,et al.  Estimating energy consumption from night-time DMPS/OLS imagery after correcting for saturation effects , 2010 .

[27]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: Is visibility important? , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Using nighttime DMSP/OLS images of city lights to estimate the impact of urban land use on soil resources in the United States , 1997 .

[29]  Dar A. Roberts,et al.  A Comparison of Nighttime Satellite Imagery and Population Density for the Continental United States , 1997 .

[30]  Leo R. M. Maas,et al.  A new pressure sensory mechanism for prey detection in birds: the use of principles of seabed dynamics? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Mapping City Lights With Nighttime Data from the DMSP Operational Linescan System , 1997 .

[32]  D. Whitfield.  Predation by Eurasian sparrowhawks produces density‐dependent mortality of wintering redshanks , 2003 .

[33]  K. Mouritsen.  Day and night feeding in Dunlins Calidris alpina: choice of habitat, foraging technique and prey , 1994 .

[34]  P. R. Evans.  Energy Balance and Optimal Foraging Strategies in Shorebirds: Some Implications for Their Distributions and Movements in the Non-Breeding Season , 2015 .

[35]  P. Hockey,et al.  Comparative diurnal and nocturnal foraging behaviour and energy intake of premigratory Grey Plovers Pluvialis squatarola and Whimbrels Numenius phaeopus in South Africa , 2008 .

[36]  Nils Warnock,et al.  Attachment of radio-transmitters to sandpipers: review and methods , 1993 .

[37]  G. Martin,et al.  Vision and touch in relation to foraging and predator detection: insightful contrasts between a plover and a sandpiper , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  W. P. Gorenzel,et al.  Characteristics of American Crow Urban Roosts in California , 1995 .

[39]  P. Sutton,et al.  Radiance Calibration of DMSP-OLS Low-Light Imaging Data of Human Settlements , 1999 .

[40]  T. Piersma,et al.  Shorebird avoidance of nearshore feeding and roosting areas at night correlates with presence of a nocturnal avian predator , 2006 .

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological light pollution , 2004 .

[43]  Movements of wintering Dunlin Calidris alpina and changing habitat availability in an agricultural wetland landscape , 2008 .

[44]  R. Elwood,et al.  Foraging ecology, fluctuating food availability and energetics of wintering brent geese , 2009 .

[45]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[46]  D. Whitacre,et al.  Raptor Predation on Wintering Shorebirds , 1975 .

[47]  N. Burton,et al.  Winter site-fidelity and survival of Redshank Tringa totanus at Cardiff, south Wales , 2000 .

[48]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Throwing light on straddling stocks of Illex argentinus: assessing fishing intensity with satellite imagery , 2002 .