Assessing organizational culture in complex sociotechnical systems : Methodological evidence from studies in nuclear power plant maintenance organizations

Failures in industrial organizations dealing with hazardous technologies can have widespread consequences for the safety of the workers and the general population. Psychology can have a major role in contributing to the safe and reliable operation of these technologies. Most current models of safety management in complex sociotechnical systems such as nuclear power plant maintenance are either non-contextual or based on an overly-rational image of an organization. Thus, they fail to grasp either the actual requirements of the work or the socially-constructed nature of the work in question. The general aim of the present study is to develop and test a methodology for contextual assessment of organizational culture in complex sociotechnical systems. This is done by demonstrating the findings that the application of the emerging methodology produces in the domain of maintenance of a nuclear power plant (NPP). The concepts of organizational culture and organizational core task (OCT) are operationalized and tested in the case studies. We argue that when the complexity of the work, technology and social environment is increased, the significance of the most implicit features of organizational culture as a means of coordinating the work and achieving safety and effectiveness of the activities also increases. For this reason a cultural perspective could provide additional insight into the problem of safety management. The present study aims to determine; (1) the elements of the organizational culture in complex sociotechnical systems; (2) the demands the maintenance task sets for the organizational culture; (3) how the current organizational culture at the case organizations supports the perception and fulfilment of the demands of the maintenance work; (4) the similarities and differences between the maintenance

[1]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[2]  Lena Kecklund,et al.  Studies of safety and critical work situations in nuclear power plants : a human factors perspective , 1998 .

[3]  F. Guldenmund The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[4]  C. Perrow The Limits of Safety: The Enhancement of a Theory of Accidents , 1994 .

[5]  M. N. Srinivas,et al.  Method in Social Anthropology , 1958 .

[6]  Charlene A. Yauch,et al.  Complementary Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Cultural Assessment Methods , 2003 .

[7]  U M Klemola,et al.  Analysis of the clinical behaviour of anaesthetists: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice , 1997, Medical education.

[8]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[9]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations , 1997 .

[10]  René Amalberti,et al.  The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems , 2001 .

[11]  Michelle M. Robertson,et al.  Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams , 2000 .

[12]  Vincent Gauthereau,et al.  Emergent structures in drug dispensing to inpatients: implications for patient safety , 2004, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[13]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[14]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  Management of change in the nuclear industry. Evidence from maintenance reorganizations : MainCulture Final Report , 2006 .

[15]  T. L. Porte High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk , 1996 .

[16]  Danny Miller,et al.  Personality, Culture, and Organization , 1986 .

[17]  Sarah L O'Connor,et al.  HUMAN ERROR IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND DISPATCH: THE BASIS OF AN ERROR TAXONOMY. , 1997 .

[18]  W. Luckas,et al.  An analysis of operational experience during low power and shutdown and a plan for addressing human reliability assessment issues , 1994 .

[19]  F. C. Thorne,et al.  The psychology of control. , 1949, Journal of clinical psychology.

[20]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[21]  Joanne D. Martin Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives , 1992 .

[22]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[23]  L. Debarberis,et al.  Safety culture enhancement through the implementation of IAEA guidelines , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[25]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  The assessment of organisational culture: A methodological study , 2002 .

[26]  Ilkka Salo,et al.  Mental causal models of incidents communicated in licensee event reports in a process industry , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[28]  Tor Hernes,et al.  Implications of Self-Reference: Niklas Luhmann’s Autopoiesis and Organization Theory , 2003 .

[29]  K. Cameron,et al.  Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework , 1999 .

[30]  Mathilde Bourrier Constructing organisational reliability: the problem of embeddedness and duality , 1998 .

[31]  B. Mark Organizational culture. , 1996, Annual review of nursing research.

[32]  Mathilde Bourrier,et al.  Organizing Maintenance Work At Two American Nuclear Power Plants , 1996 .

[33]  D. Cremer,et al.  Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach , 2001 .

[34]  G. S. Saffold Culture Traits, Strength, and Organizational Performance: Moving Beyond “Strong” Culture , 1988 .

[35]  M. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings , 2002 .

[36]  D M Gaba,et al.  The culture of safety: results of an organization-wide survey in 15 California hospitals , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[37]  Kevin G. Corley Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change , 2004 .

[38]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[39]  K. Charmaz,et al.  3 Grounded Theory , 2009 .

[40]  T. Cox,et al.  The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example , 1991 .

[41]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Chapter 8: Analysis of Challenges to Nuclear Power Plant Safety Management: Finland, Sweden, and the European Context , 2006 .

[42]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Organisational decision making and risk management under pressure from fast technological change , 1998 .

[43]  Taeki Lee,et al.  Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations , 2000 .

[44]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  Osaamisen hallinta ydinvoimalaitoksessa operaattoreiden sukupolvenvaihdostilanteessa , 2003 .

[45]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Associations between Errors and Contributing Factors in Aircraft Maintenance , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Larry Hirschhorn The Primary Risk , 1999 .

[47]  K. Weick Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[48]  Pietro Carlo Cacciabue,et al.  The development of a model and simulation of an aviation maintenance technician task performance , 2003, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[49]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Comparison of Organisational Cultures at Two NPP Maintenance Units : When is Maintenance work motivating and meaningful? , 2004 .

[50]  Simo Salminen,et al.  Perceived Nuclear Risk, Organizational Commitment, and Appraisals of Management: A Study of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel , 1995 .

[51]  Fang Lee Cooke,et al.  The Important Role of the Maintenance Workforce in Technological Change: A Much Neglected Aspect , 2002 .

[52]  A. Hopkins Safety, Culture and Risk , 2005 .

[53]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience : The challenge of the unstable , 2006 .

[54]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  The culture of high reliability: quantitative and qualitative assessment aboard nuclear-powered aircraft carriers , 1994 .

[55]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  5. Playing the Maintenance Game: How Mental Models Drive Organizational Decisions , 2018, Debating Rationality.

[56]  Lisa Lundborg,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT by , 2004 .

[57]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[58]  A. Swan ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE , 2004 .

[59]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Re-Viewing Organization , 2001 .

[60]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity , 2001 .

[61]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[62]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[63]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[64]  Joan Harvey,et al.  The effectiveness of training to change safety culture and attitudes within a highly regulated environment , 2001 .

[65]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  Measuring conceptual knowledge among NPP maintenance personnel -A tool for knowledge management , 2007, 2007 IEEE 8th Human Factors and Power Plants and HPRCT 13th Annual Meeting.

[66]  Nigel Parton,et al.  Reflections on the social construction of reality:A treatise in the sociology of knowledge , 2009 .

[67]  Robert Drazin,et al.  On the Language of Organization Theory , 1989 .

[68]  Maaria Nuutinen,et al.  Expert Identity in Development of Core-Task-Oriented Working Practices for Mastering Demanding Situations , 2006 .

[69]  Nik Chmiel,et al.  Introduction to work and organizational psychology , 2000 .

[70]  S. Clarke Perceptions of organizational safety: implications for the development of safety culture , 1999 .

[71]  A. Glendon,et al.  Perspectives on safety culture , 2000 .

[72]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Organizing to Reduce the Vulnerabilities of Complexity , 1999 .

[73]  Barry Turner,et al.  Exploring the industrial subculture , 1971 .

[74]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[75]  K. Weick Organizational redesign as improvisation , 1993 .

[76]  O. Svenson,et al.  Nordic perspectives on safety management in high reliability organizations: Theory and applications , 2006 .

[77]  Alistair Cheyne,et al.  Modelling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity , 1998 .

[78]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[79]  Scott A. Snook,et al.  Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over Northern Iraq , 2001 .

[80]  Daniel R. Denison,et al.  WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE? A NATIVE'S POINT OF VIEW ON A DECADE OF PARADIGM WARS. , 1993 .

[81]  R. T. Kennedy Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its regulatory role , 1977 .

[82]  Shinya Shibuya,et al.  Human factors in nuclear power plant maintenance' an empirical study , 1998 .

[83]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[84]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[85]  E. Young,et al.  On the Naming of the Rose:* Interests and Multiple Meanings as Elements of Organizational Culture , 1989 .

[86]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[87]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate on offshore installations , 1998 .

[88]  F. Glen The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[89]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Problem Solving Performance of Maintenance Trainees in a Fault Diagnosis Task , 1979 .

[90]  Ann Williamson,et al.  The development of a measure of safety climate: The role of safety perceptions and attitudes , 1997 .

[91]  Andrew R.Hale and Jan Hovden,et al.  Management and culture: the third age of safety. A review of approaches to organizational aspects of safety, health and environment , 1998 .

[92]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[93]  Pasquale Gagliardi,et al.  The Creation and Change of Organizational Cultures: A Conceptual Framework , 1986 .

[94]  Gene I. Rochlin,et al.  Reliable Organizations: Present Research and Future Directions , 1996 .

[95]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Prologue: Resilience Engineering Concepts , 2006 .

[96]  Alan L. Wilkins,et al.  Efficient Cultures: Exploring the Relationship between Culture and Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[97]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[98]  Philip Selznick Foundations of the Theory of Organization , 1948 .

[99]  M. Hatch,et al.  Living With Multiple Paradigms the Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies , 1996 .

[100]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[101]  Pekka Pyy,et al.  An analysis of maintenance failures at a nuclear power plant , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[102]  A. T. Fido,et al.  Safety Management Systems. , 1989 .

[103]  G. Kunda Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation , 1993 .

[104]  K B Haller,et al.  Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[105]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Shared Situation Awareness as a Contributor to High Reliability Performance in Railroad Operations , 2006 .

[106]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  Heroes, Organizations and High Reliability , 1996 .

[107]  Lee T. Ostrom,et al.  Assessing safety culture , 2009 .

[108]  Peter Case,et al.  Organizational Culture and Identity , 2002 .