Inserts thermal coupling analysis in hexagonal honeycomb plates used for satellite structural design

Abstract Mechanical joints and fasteners are essential elements in joining structural components in mechanical systems. The thermal coupling effect between the adjacent inserts depends to a great extent on the thermal properties of the inserts and the clearance. In this paper the Finite-Element Method (FEM) has been employed to study the insert thermal coupling behaviour of the hexagonal honeycomb panel. Fully coupled thermal analysis was conducted in order to predict thermal coupling phenomena caused by the adjacent inserts under extreme thermal loading conditions. Detailed finite elements models for a honeycomb panel are developed in this study including the insert joints. New approach of the adhesive joint is modelled. Thermal simulations showed that the adjacent inserts cause thermal interference and the adjacent inserts are highly sensitive to the effect of high temperatures. The clearance and thermal interference between the adjacent inserts have an important influence on the satellite equipments (such as the electronics box), which can cause the satellite equipments failures. The results of the model presented in this analysis are significant in the preliminary satellites structural dimensioning which present an effective approach of development by reducing the cost and the time of analysis.

[1]  G Richardson,et al.  Static Performance of Hot Bonded and Cold Bonded Inserts in Honeycomb Panels , 2011 .

[2]  A. Boudjemai,et al.  Small Satellite Structural Optimisation Using Genetic Algorithm Approach , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies.

[3]  Dai Gil Lee,et al.  Characteristics of joining inserts for composite sandwich panels , 2008 .

[4]  Jin-Hwe Kweon,et al.  An experimental study of the insert joint strength of composite sandwich structures , 2008 .

[5]  Song-Jeng Huang,et al.  Electronic speckle pattern interferometry applied to the displacement measurement of sandwich plates with two ‘fully potted’ inserts , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Battley,et al.  Strength Variability of Inserts in Sandwich Panels , 2009 .

[7]  M. Ashby,et al.  The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals , 2001 .

[8]  Elena Bozhevolnaya,et al.  Structurally Graded Core Inserts in Sandwich Panels , 2005 .

[9]  Dai Gil Lee,et al.  Development of a satellite structure with the sandwich T-joint , 2010 .

[10]  Bruno Castanié,et al.  Non-linear finite element analysis of inserts in composite sandwich structures , 2008 .

[11]  A. Boudjemai,et al.  Modal analysis and testing of hexagonal honeycomb plates used for satellite structural design , 2012 .

[12]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems , 1998 .

[13]  Bryan Smith,et al.  Reliability of inserts in sandwich composite panels , 2012 .

[14]  G Richardson,et al.  Optimization of bolted joints connecting honeycomb panels , 2007 .

[15]  Jean-François Ferrero,et al.  Analyse d'inserts pour les structures sandwich composites , 2000 .

[16]  H. K. Cho,et al.  Vibration in a satellite structure with a laminate composite hybrid sandwich panel , 2011 .

[17]  B. Castanié,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Inserts in Sandwich Structures , 2005 .

[18]  T N Bitzer,et al.  Honeycomb Technology: Materials, Design, Manufacturing, Applications and Testing , 1997 .

[19]  Ole Thybo Thomsen,et al.  Sandwich Plates with “Through-the-Thickness” and “Fully Potted” Inserts , 1998 .

[20]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Fabrication and structural performance of periodic cellular metal sandwich structures , 2003 .

[21]  Sebastian Heimbs,et al.  Failure behaviour of honeycomb sandwich corner joints and inserts , 2009 .