Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design

Safe-by-design (SBD) frameworks for the development of emerging technologies have become an ever more popular means by which scholars argue that transformative emerging technologies can safely incorporate human values. One such popular SBD methodology is called value sensitive design (VSD). A central tenet of this design methodology is to investigate stakeholder values and design those values into technologies during early stage research and development. To accomplish this, the VSD framework mandates that designers consult the philosophical and ethical literature to best determine how to weigh moral trade-offs. However, the VSD framework also concedes the universalism of moral values, particularly the values of freedom, autonomy, equality trust and privacy justice. This paper argues that the VSD methodology, particularly applied to nano-bio-info-cogno technologies, has an insufficient grounding for the determination of moral values. As such, an exploration of the value-investigations of VSD are deconstructed to illustrate both its strengths and weaknesses. This paper also provides possible modalities for the strengthening of the VSD methodology, particularly through the application of moral imagination and how moral imagination exceeds the boundaries of moral intuitions in the development of novel technologies.

[1]  J. van den Hoven,et al.  Ethics and Nanopharmacy: Value Sensitive Design of New Drugs , 2011, Nanoethics.

[2]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  Computer security and the modern home , 2013, CACM.

[3]  J. Savulescu,et al.  Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[4]  Pamela Briggs,et al.  An Inclusive, Value Sensitive Design Perspective on Future Identity Technologies , 2015, TCHI.

[5]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History: Contents , 1981 .

[6]  A. van Wynsberghe Designing robots with care: creating an ethical framework for the future design and implementation of care robots , 2012 .

[7]  Mark L. Johnson The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[8]  Giuseppe Contissa,et al.  The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[9]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[10]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Metaphor, metonymy, and binding , 2002 .

[11]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  AI assisted ethics , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[12]  Graham Harman Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) , 2019 .

[13]  Subhasis Chattopadhyay,et al.  Review of Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything , 2019 .

[14]  Bruce Goldberg MECHANISM AND MEANING , 2016 .

[15]  Noëmi Manders-Huits,et al.  Value‐Sensitive Design , 2009 .

[16]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy , 1988 .

[17]  Philip A.E. Brey,et al.  Values in Technology and Disclosive Computer Ethics. , 2010 .

[18]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design , 2015 .

[19]  Steven Umbrello,et al.  Atomically Precise Manufacturing and Responsible Innovation: A Value Sensitive Design Approach to Explorative Nanophilosophy , 2019, Int. J. Technoethics.

[20]  G. Harman Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory , 2016 .

[21]  Sun Young Park,et al.  Technological and Organizational Adaptation of EMR Implementation in an Emergency Department , 2015, TCHI.

[22]  Patrick Lin,et al.  Compassionate AI and Selfless Robots: A Buddhist Approach , 2012 .

[23]  E. Mordini The narrative dimension of nanotechnology , 2007 .

[24]  Mark Turner,et al.  The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity , 2006 .

[25]  J. Hoven Architecture and Value-Sensitive Design , 2013 .

[26]  M. Kemeny,et al.  Psychobiological responses to social threat: Evolution of a psychological model in psychoneuroimmunology , 2009, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[27]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[28]  Graham Harman Object-Oriented Ontology , 2015 .

[29]  R. Rorty Contingency, irony, and solidarity: Contents , 1989 .

[30]  C. Kahn Plato's Theory of Desire , 1987 .

[31]  Bruno Cozzi,et al.  Expression of calcium-binding proteins and selected neuropeptides in the human, chimpanzee, and crab-eating macaque claustrum , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[32]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime , 2017 .

[33]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Future Progress in Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Expert Opinion , 2013, PT-AI.

[34]  Mark Turner,et al.  The Artful Mind , 2006 .

[35]  Francisco J. Varela,et al.  The Embodied Mind , 2018 .

[36]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , 2008 .

[37]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[38]  Alina Huldtgren,et al.  Design for Values in ICT , 2015 .

[39]  Seth D. Baum,et al.  Evaluating Future Nanotechnology: The Net Societal Impacts of Atomically Precise Manufacturing , 2018, Futures.

[40]  Peter Gregor,et al.  User-Sensitive Inclusive Design , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[41]  M. Flanagan,et al.  Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice , 2008 .

[42]  Y. van de Peer,et al.  The sociobiology of genes: the gene’s eye view as a unifying behavioural-ecological framework for biological evolution , 2017, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.

[43]  Philip A.E. Brey,et al.  Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn , 2010 .

[44]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design : sources, theory, values and application domains , 2015 .

[45]  Michael Stocker,et al.  The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories , 1976 .

[46]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces , 2008 .

[47]  Alan Borning,et al.  A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods , 2018, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  Francien Dechesne,et al.  Ethical requirements for reconfigurable sensor technology: a challenge for value sensitive design , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[49]  M. Tsay-Vogel,et al.  The Dual Role of Morally Ambiguous Characters: Examining the Effect of Morality Salience on Narrative Responses , 2015 .

[50]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[51]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Service robots, care ethics, and design , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[52]  Francesca Ervas,et al.  Argumentation as a Bridge Between Metaphor and Reasoning , 2018 .

[53]  J. Peterson,et al.  Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief , 1999 .

[54]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reason, Truth and History. , 1985 .

[55]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Ethicist as Designer: A Pragmatic Approach to Ethics in the Lab , 2014, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[56]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy , 1988 .

[57]  Justin L. Harmon The Normative Architecture of Reality: Towards an Object-Oriented Ethics , 2016 .

[58]  C. Tilmouth Passion's Triumph over Reason: A History of the Moral Imagination from Spenser to Rochester , 2007 .

[59]  Rebecca Roache Ethics, Speculation, and Values , 2008 .

[60]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Morality for Humans: Ethical Understanding from the Perspective of Cognitive Science , 2014 .

[61]  Steven H. Fesmire,et al.  John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics , 2003 .

[62]  Maria Borges What can Kant teach us about emotions , 2004 .

[63]  Steven Umbrello,et al.  A Value-Sensitive Design Approach to Intelligent Agents , 2018, Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security.

[64]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[65]  Jan Gogoll,et al.  Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[66]  Seumas Miller,et al.  Designing in ethics , 2017 .

[67]  T. Sarbin Embodiment and the Narrative Structure of Emotional Life , 2001 .

[68]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[69]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  The Design Turn in Applied Ethics , 2017 .

[70]  Matthias Rolf,et al.  What If: Robots Create Novel Goals? Ethics Based on Social Value Systems , 2016, EDIA@ECAI.

[71]  Steven Umbrello,et al.  Beneficial Artificial Intelligence Coordination by Means of a Value Sensitive Design Approach , 2019, Big Data Cogn. Comput..

[72]  Mark L. Johnson Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics , 1993 .

[73]  Seth D. Baum,et al.  On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence , 2017, AI & SOCIETY.

[74]  Steven Umbrello The moral psychology of value sensitive design: the methodological issues of moral intuitions for responsible innovation , 2018 .

[75]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[76]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy: Introduction , 2008 .

[77]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Design for the Value of PrivacyPrivacy , 2015 .

[78]  Donna Haraway,et al.  Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene , 2016 .

[79]  T. Morton Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence , 2016 .

[80]  Mark Turner,et al.  Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science , 1997 .

[81]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[82]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  A method for integrating ethics into the design of robots , 2013, Ind. Robot.

[83]  Robert Paul Churchill Ghosts in the Machine?: On the Limits of Narrative Identity in Cyberspace , 2019, Int. J. Technoethics.

[84]  C. Tilmouth Passion's Triumph over Reason , 2007 .

[85]  K. Abraham,et al.  Knowledge and Politics , 1975 .

[86]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[87]  Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst,et al.  Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.