A new simpler rotation/curvature correction method for Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model

Abstract A new and much simpler rotation and curvature effects factor, which takes the form of Richardson number suggested by Hellsten originally for SST k–ω model, is presented for Spalart and Shur’s rotation and curvature correction in the context of Spalart–Allmaras (SA) turbulence model. The new factor excludes the Lagrangian derivative of the strain rate tensor that exists in the SARC model, resulting in a simple, efficient and easy-to-implement approach for SA turbulence model (denoted as SARCM) to account for the effects of system rotation and curvature, techniquely. And then the SARCM is tested through turbulent curved wall flows: one is the flow over a zero-pressure-gradient curved wall and the other is the channel flow in a duct with a U-turn. Predictions of the SARCM model are compared with experimental data and with the results obtained using original SA and SARC models. The numerical results show that SARCM can predict the rotation–curvature effects as accurately as SARC, but considerably more efficiently. Additionally, the accuracy of SARCM might strongly depend on the rotation–curvature model constants. Suggesting values for those constants are given, after some trials and errors.

[1]  C. H. Priddin,et al.  The calculation of turbulent boundary layers on spinning and curved surfaces , 1977 .

[2]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[3]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Isolating curvature effects in computing wall-bounded turbulent flows , 2001 .

[4]  M. A. Leschziner,et al.  Modelling 2D separation from a high lift aerofoil with a non-linear eddy-viscosity model and second-moment closure , 1995, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[5]  Michael S. Shur,et al.  Comparative numerical testing of one- and two-equation turbulence models for flows with separation and reattachment , 1995 .

[6]  James P. Johnston,et al.  Effects of spanwise rotation on the structure of two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flow , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  P. Spalart,et al.  On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature , 1997 .

[8]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  The analogy between streamline curvature and buoyancy in turbulent shear flow , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Antti Hellsten,et al.  Some improvements in Menter's k-omega SST turbulence model , 1998 .

[10]  H. L. Seegmiller,et al.  Comparison of experiment with calculations using curvature-corrected zero and two equation turbulence models for a two-dimensional U-duct , 1990 .

[11]  G. Mellor,et al.  Experiment on convex curvature effects in turbulent boundary layers , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  S. V. Patankar,et al.  Flow Prediction in Rotating Ducts Using Coriolis-Modified Turbulence Models , 1980 .

[13]  Joseph H. Morrison,et al.  Turbulence model predictions of extra-strain rate effects in strongly-curved flows , 1999 .

[14]  P. Spalart,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction , 2000 .

[15]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  Sensitization of the SST Turbulence Model to Rotation and Curvature by Applying the Spalart–Shur Correction Term , 2009 .