Using technology acceptance models for product development: case study of a smart payment card

Since its development, the technology acceptance model (TAM) has been adapted for a multitude of different technologies and has proven very useful in a research context. These TAM adaptations are, however, less appropriate in product development since they do not contribute much to guide design and branding. We have revised the original TAM with the specific aim of application during new product development (NPD) and applied this model in a study on the acceptance of smart payment cards. The results provide helpful insights into the relevance of different potential benefits, suggesting that usefulness perception is most impacted by increased convenience, improved transaction overview and usage fun. Further, the model suggests that a good fit with who we are, rather than who we wish to be or feel we ought to be, is of special importance for usage intention. The application of NPDTAM in product development can be recommended.

[1]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[4]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[5]  Graham Pervan,et al.  ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology , 2015, Internet Res..

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Alexander Rossmann,et al.  Technology acceptance in the case of iot appliances , 2016, DEC.

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Chi Zhang,et al.  Technology acceptance in learning settings from a student perspective: a theoretical framework , 2010, SIGITE '10.

[11]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model , 2012, AutomotiveUI.

[12]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Joar Vittersø,et al.  Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Philipp A. Rauschnabel,et al.  Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers , 2016 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..