A Contextual Multipartite Network Approach to Comprehending the Structure of Naval Design.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Thomas W. Valente. Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.
[2] D. J. Andrews,et al. Art and science in the design of physically large and complex systems , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[3] Jari Saramäki,et al. Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
[4] Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al. Bayesian Networks for Set-Based Collaborative Design , 2009, DAC 2009.
[5] Panos Y. Papalambros,et al. A Network Reliability Approach to Optimal Decomposition of Design Problems , 1995 .
[6] P. John Clarkson,et al. Matrices or Node-Link Diagrams: Which Visual Representation is Better for Visualising Connectivity Models? , 2006, Inf. Vis..
[7] D K Brown,et al. HISTORY AS A DESIGN TOOL , 1993 .
[8] Marin D. Guenov,et al. Application of axiomatic design and design structure matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems , 2005, Syst. Eng..
[9] David J. Singer,et al. Set-Based Design and the Ship to Shore Connector , 2011 .
[10] Nancy G. Leveson,et al. A New Approach To System Safety Engineering , 2005 .
[11] K. Schittkowski,et al. NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2022 .
[12] Robert Smith,et al. Ship Design Process Modeling: Capturing a Highly Complex Process , 2011 .
[13] Ali A. Yassine,et al. Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[14] M. Kreimeyer,et al. Relating Two Domains via a Third: An Approach to Overcome Ambiguous Attributions Using Multiple Domain Matrices , 2008, DAC 2008.
[15] Mark Newman,et al. Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .
[16] Steven D. Eppinger,et al. A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products , 2007 .
[17] Donald V. Steward,et al. Re-engineering the design process , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.
[18] David J. Singer,et al. Decomposing ship arrangements using signed networks , 2011 .
[19] M. Newman,et al. A network-based ranking system for US college football , 2005, physics/0505169.
[20] Durward K. Sobek,et al. Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .
[21] Adriana Fernandez,et al. The changing nature of the U.S. economic influence in the World , 2010 .
[22] Justin W. Gillespie,et al. A Network Science Approach to Understanding and Generating Ship Arrangements in Early-Stage Design. , 2012 .
[23] Jerry Banks,et al. Discrete Event Simulation , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.
[24] Durward K. Sobek,et al. Adapting real options to new product development by modeling the second Toyota paradox , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[25] Olivier L. de Weck,et al. Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation , 2011 .
[26] K J MacCallum. UNDERSTANDING RELATIONSHIPS IN MARINE SYSTEMS DESIGN , 1982 .
[27] Alex H. B. Duffy,et al. Intelligent design guidance , 2003 .
[28] Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al. Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design , 2008 .
[29] Adam Baldwin,et al. Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design , 1999 .
[30] David J. Singer,et al. Applying Real Options Analysis to Naval Ship Design , 2014 .
[31] D. V. Steward. Planning and managing the design of systems , 1991, Technology Management : the New International Language.
[32] Michael C Pasqual. Multilayer network modeling of change propagation for engineering change management , 2010 .
[33] Kemper Lewis,et al. Using Network Theory to Model Distributed Design Systems , 2010 .
[34] David J. Singer,et al. An agent-based framework for simultaneously arranging spaces, components and systems , 2010 .
[35] W. H. WHITE. Naval Architecture , 1904, Nature.
[36] Reinhard Diestel,et al. Graph Theory , 1997 .
[37] John N. Tsitsiklis,et al. Introduction to linear optimization , 1997, Athena scientific optimization and computation series.
[38] Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al. Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[39] Charles H. Fine,et al. A method for systems design using precedence relationships: an application to automotive brake systems , 1990 .
[40] U. Lindemann,et al. Structural Complexity Management , 2009 .
[41] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. An integrated approach to automated innovization for discovering useful design principles: Case studies from engineering , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..
[42] M Palmer,et al. Advanced Engineering Mathematics , 2003 .
[43] Dan Braha,et al. The Topology of Large-Scale Engineering Problem-Solving Networks , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[44] Joshua I. Bernstein,et al. Design methods in the aerospace industry : looking for evidence of set-based practices , 1998 .
[45] David K. Brown. Warrior to Dreadnought : warship design and development, 1860-1905 , 2010 .
[46] Kemper Lewis,et al. The Impact of Process Architecture on Equilibrium Stability in Distributed Design , 2011 .
[47] Michael G. Parsons,et al. Intelligent Ship Arrangements: A New Approach to General Arrangement , 2008 .
[48] Steven D. Eppinger,et al. Understanding the effects of product architecture on technical communication in product develoment organizations , 2000 .
[49] Daniel E. Whitney,et al. Connectivity maps: Modeling and analysing relationships in product development processes , 2003 .
[50] Clifford Goodman,et al. American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1988 .
[51] Ali A. Yassine,et al. Engineering design management: An information structure approach , 1999 .
[52] D K Brown. DEFINING A WARSHIP , 1986 .
[53] Robert P. Smith,et al. Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration , 2015 .
[54] Dj Andrews. Simulation and the design building block approach in the design of ships and other complex systems , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[55] F. W. Kellaway,et al. Advanced Engineering Mathematics , 1969, The Mathematical Gazette.
[56] Alan Brown,et al. Dynamics of Naval Ship design : a systems approach. , 1999 .
[57] Dan Braha,et al. Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..
[58] Dgm Watson,et al. SOME SHIP DESIGN METHODS , 1977 .
[59] D. V. Steward. Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design , 1981 .
[60] Liviu Iftode,et al. Finding hierarchy in directed online social networks , 2011, WWW.
[61] George S. Fishman,et al. Discrete-event simulation , 2001 .
[62] Marie Lützen,et al. BAYESIAN AND NEURAL NETWORKS FOR PRELIMINARY SHIP DESIGN , 2001 .
[63] Mads Haahr,et al. Social Network Analysis for Information Flow in Disconnected Delay-Tolerant MANETs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.
[64] J. Holtrop,et al. AN APPROXIMATE POWER PREDICTION METHOD , 1982 .
[65] Bethany S. Dohleman. Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .
[66] Rudolf Ahlswede,et al. Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[67] J. Ponstein,et al. Self-Avoiding Paths and the Adjacency Matrix of a Graph , 1966 .
[68] Robert O Work. The Littoral Combat Ship: How We Got Here, and Why , 2014 .
[69] Tyson R. Browning,et al. Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[70] David J. Singer,et al. What Is Set-Based Design? , 2009 .
[71] Ali Yassine,et al. Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..
[72] D. V. Steward,et al. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
[73] Richard L. Daft,et al. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .
[74] J. Sleigh,et al. The seven bridges of Königsberg. , 2011, Anesthesiology.
[75] David J. Singer,et al. The use of a fuzzy logic set-based design tool to evaluate varying complexities of late-stage design changes , 2011 .
[76] Maik Maurer,et al. Structural Awareness in Complex Product Design , 2007 .
[77] David J. Singer,et al. Analyzing the dynamic behavior of marine design tools using network theory , 2015 .
[78] Offer Shai,et al. Transforming engineering problems through graph representations , 2003, Adv. Eng. Informatics.
[79] J. Liker. The Toyota Way , 2003 .
[80] Corey Michael Kerns. Naval Ship Design and Synthesis Model Architecture Using a Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach , 2011 .
[81] P. John Clarkson,et al. Supporting product architecture design using computational design synthesis with network structure constraints , 2012 .
[82] David J. Singer,et al. The use of network theory to model disparate ship design information , 2014 .
[83] Sadri Hassani,et al. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2000 .
[84] Thomas A. McKenney,et al. An Early-Stage Set-Based Design Reduction Decision Support Framework Utilizing Design Space Mapping and a Graph Theoretic Markov Decision Process Formulation , 2013 .
[85] Jason E Bartolomei. Qualitative knowledge construction for engineering systems : extending the design structure matrix methodology in scope and procedure , 2007 .
[86] Tyson R. Browning,et al. Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .
[87] Tyson R. Browning,et al. Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .
[88] Dj Andrews. CREATIVE SHIP DESIGN , 1981 .
[89] David J. Singer,et al. Identifying drivers of general arrangements through the use of network measures of centrality and hierarchy , 2013 .
[90] Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al. Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .