The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews.

[1]  R. Horton,et al.  Time to register randomised trials , 1999, The Lancet.

[2]  Richard Smith,et al.  Time to register randomised trials , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  A Laupacis,et al.  Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale. , 1999, Controlled clinical trials.

[4]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  W B Jonas,et al.  Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  H. Vet,et al.  The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  A D Oxman,et al.  The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials , 1998, BMJ.

[8]  D. Cook,et al.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.

[9]  A R Jadad,et al.  Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: II. How did the authors find the studies and assess their quality? , 1998, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[10]  H. Vet,et al.  Balneotherapy and quality assessment: interobserver reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  A Ohlsson,et al.  Quality and retrieval of obstetrical anaesthesia randomized controlled trials , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[12]  L. Bouter,et al.  Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain: An Updated Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials , 1996, Spine.

[13]  R. D. Bie,et al.  Methodology of systematic reviews: an introduction , 1996 .

[14]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[15]  K. Schulz,et al.  Methodology citations and the quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecology. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: Current Issues and Future Directions , 1996, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[19]  Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.  The CONSORT Statement , 1996 .

[20]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. , 1995, Controlled clinical trials.

[21]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[22]  D. Cook,et al.  Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  Curtis L. Meinert,et al.  A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[24]  L. Bouter,et al.  The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  S Greenland,et al.  Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  L. Bouter,et al.  The efficacy of chiropractic manipulation for back pain: blinded review of relevant randomized clinical trials. , 1992, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[28]  C D Naylor,et al.  Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Clinical trials of homoeopathy. , 1991, BMJ.

[30]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  J D Emerson,et al.  An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. , 1990, Controlled clinical trials.

[32]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials , 1990, The Lancet.

[33]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Acupuncture and chronic pain: a criteria-based meta-analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  F. Mosteller,et al.  How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  M. Jenicek,et al.  Meta-analysis in medicine. Where we are and where we want to go. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  R. Horwitz,et al.  Resolving conflicting clinical trials: guidelines for meta-analysis. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  M. Evans,et al.  Trials on trial. A review of trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. , 1984, Archives of surgery.

[39]  T C Chalmers,et al.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.

[40]  Gordon Tullock,et al.  Trials On Trial , 1980 .