Liquidity risk and the covered bond market in times of crisis: empirical evidence from Germany

Abstract Liquidity risk is the risk that an asset cannot always be sold without causing a fall in its price because of a lack of demand for this asset. Many empirical studies examining liquidity premia have focused on government bonds. In this paper, we specifically investigate the yield differentials between liquid and illiquid German covered bonds by considering the yields of traditional Pfandbrief bonds and Jumbo Pfandbrief bonds with different maturities. In terms of credit risk the spread between the yields of these two types of covered bonds should be zero. Moreover, assuming that the liquidity risk premium is a stationary variable the yields of Pfandbrief bonds and Jumbo Pfandbrief bonds (which seem to be integrated of order one) should be cointegrated. We make use of the methodology proposed in the related field of fractional integrated models to conduct our empirical analysis. Due to the 2008–2009 global financial crisis, it also seems to be appropriate to consider structural change. To the extent that the European Central Bank has started to purchase covered bonds under the crisis pressure, our empirical evidence would have a high relevance for monetary policymakers as far as the liquidity risk is concerned. Here, our results indicate fractionally cointegrated yields before and after the crisis, while the degree of integration of the spread increases strongly during the crisis.

[1]  C. Koziol,et al.  Valuation of Bond Illiquidity , 2007 .

[2]  Motohiro Yogo,et al.  Euro-area quantitative easing and portfolio rebalancing , 2017 .

[3]  Marc Gürtler,et al.  Empirical Analysis of the International Public Covered Bond Market , 2018 .

[4]  M. S. Rapp,et al.  Stock market effects of ECB’s Asset Purchase Programmes: Firm-level evidence , 2018, Economics Letters.

[5]  C. Kool,et al.  Do European banks with a covered bond program issue asset-backed securities for funding? , 2018 .

[6]  Peter C. B. Phillips,et al.  Exact Local Whittle Estimation of Fractional Integration , 2002 .

[7]  Marcel Fratzscher Financial Market Integration in Europe: On the Effects of Emu on Stock Markets , 2001 .

[8]  Robert E. Lucas,et al.  Liquidity and interest rates , 1990 .

[9]  J. Geweke,et al.  THE ESTIMATION AND APPLICATION OF LONG MEMORY TIME SERIES MODELS , 1983 .

[10]  Zhongjun Qu,et al.  A Test Against Spurious Long Memory , 2009 .

[11]  P. Robinson Multiple Local Whittle Estimation in Stationary Systems , 2007, 0811.0948.

[12]  M. Nielsen,et al.  Fully Modified Narrow-Band Least Squares Estimation of Weak Fractional Cointegration , 2011 .

[13]  Peter C. B. Phillips,et al.  Limit Theory for Moderate Deviations from a Unit Root , 2004 .

[14]  Katsumi Shimotsu,et al.  EXACT LOCAL WHITTLE ESTIMATION OF FRACTIONAL INTEGRATION WITH UNKNOWN MEAN AND TIME TREND , 2009, Econometric Theory.

[15]  H. Bierens,et al.  TIME-VARYING COINTEGRATION , 2010, Econometric Theory.

[16]  J. Zietz,et al.  Determining the effectiveness of the Eurosystem’s Covered Bond Purchase Programs on secondary markets☆ , 2017 .

[17]  Marcel Prokopczuk,et al.  Credit Risk in Covered Bonds , 2012 .

[18]  S. Johansen,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEY , 2009 .

[19]  David Goldreich,et al.  The Price of Future Liquidity: Time-Varying Liquidity in the U.S. Treasury Market , 2002 .

[20]  S. Schwarcz The Conundrum of Covered Bonds , 2012 .

[21]  P. Perron,et al.  Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power , 2001 .

[22]  B. Christensen,et al.  Asymptotic normality of narrow-band least squares in the stationary fractional cointegration model and volatility forecasting , 2006 .

[23]  Christopher J. Neely,et al.  Four stories of quantitative easing , 2013 .

[24]  P. Sibbertsen,et al.  Testing for a break in the persistence in yield spreads of EMU government bonds , 2013 .

[25]  S. Johansen STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[26]  Marc Gürtler,et al.  Risk assessment of mortgage covered bonds: International evidence , 2019, Finance Research Letters.

[27]  Giovanni Covi The emerging regulatory landscape: a new normal , 2017 .

[28]  C. Velasco Gaussian Semi‐parametric Estimation of Fractional Cointegration , 2003 .

[29]  Jacob Boudoukh,et al.  Liquidity as a Choice Variable: A Lesson from the Japanese Government Bond Market , 1993 .

[30]  J. Trichet State of the Union: The Financial Crisis and the ECB's Response between 2007 and 2009 , 2010 .

[31]  Interest Rate Convergence in the EMS Prior to European Monetary Union , 2009 .

[32]  C. Koziol,et al.  Valuation of Bond Illiquidity: An Option-Theoretical Approach , 2003 .

[33]  Tae-Hwan Kim,et al.  CUSUM of Squares-Based Tests for a Change in Persistence , 2007 .

[34]  Benoit Perron,et al.  Long Memory and the Relation between Implied and Realized Volatility , 2006 .

[35]  O. Korn,et al.  The term structure of illiquidity premia , 2012 .

[36]  Marcel Prokopczuk,et al.  Risk Premia in Covered Bond Markets , 2012, The Journal of Fixed Income.

[37]  Frederik Kunze,et al.  Government bond yields in Germany and Spain—empirical evidence from better days , 2018 .

[38]  Katsumi Shimotsu Exact local Whittle estimation of fractionally cointegrated systems , 2012 .

[39]  Robinson Kruse,et al.  Testing for a Break in Persistence Under Long-Range Dependencies , 2007 .