Environmental impacts of residual municipal solid waste incineration: a comparison of 110 French incinerators using a life cycle approach.

Incineration is the main option for residual Municipal Solid Waste treatment in France. This study compares the environmental performances of 110 French incinerators (i.e., 85% of the total number of plants currently in activity in France) in a Life Cycle Assessment perspective, considering 5 non-toxic impact categories: climate change, photochemical oxidant formation, particulate matter formation, terrestrial acidification and marine eutrophication. Mean, median and lower/upper impact potentials are determined considering the incineration of 1 tonne of French residual Municipal Solid Waste. The results highlight the relatively large variability of the impact potentials as a function of the plant technical performances. In particular, the climate change impact potential of the incineration of 1 tonne of waste ranges from a benefit of -58 kg CO2-eq to a relatively large burden of 408 kg CO2-eq, with 294 kg CO2-eq as the average impact. Two main plant-specific parameters drive the impact potentials regarding the 5 non-toxic impact categories under study: the energy recovery and delivery rate and the NOx process-specific emissions. The variability of the impact potentials as a function of incinerator characteristics therefore calls for the use of site-specific data when required by the LCA goal and scope definition phase, in particular when the study focuses on a specific incinerator or on a local waste management plan, and when these data are available.

[1]  Almut Beate Heinrich,et al.  International reference life cycle data system handbook , 2010 .

[2]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[3]  Gaël Bellenfant,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of landfill biogas management: sensitivity to diffuse and combustion air emissions. , 2013, Waste management.

[4]  S Consonni,et al.  Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste Part B: Emission and cost estimates. , 2005, Waste management.

[5]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Environmental assessment of garden waste management in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark. , 2011, Waste management.

[6]  Yuri Lawryshyn,et al.  The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion. , 2012, Waste management.

[7]  Christian Riber,et al.  Environmental assessment of waste incineration in a life-cycle-perspective (EASEWASTE) , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[8]  Jasper Becker,et al.  Joint Research Centre , 1982, Nature.

[9]  G. Dóka Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services , 2003 .

[10]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[11]  Dominik Saner,et al.  Probabilistic and technology-specific modeling of emissions from municipal solid-waste incineration. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Ferdinand Kleppmann,et al.  Confederation of European Waste to Energy Plants - CEWEP , 2003 .

[13]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of waste incineration in Denmark and Italy using two LCA models , 2011, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[14]  Rana Pant,et al.  Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management with LCT and LCA , 2011 .

[15]  T. Astrup,et al.  Energy recovery from waste incineration: assessing the importance of district heating networks. , 2010, Waste management.