Adaptation of Methanogenic Communities to the Cofermentation of Cattle Excreta and Olive Mill Wastes at 37°C and 55°C

ABSTRACT The acclimatization of methanogens to two-phase olive mill wastes (TPOMW) was investigated in pilot fermenters started up with cattle excreta (37°C) and after changing their feed to excreta plus TPOMW (37°C or 55°C) or TPOMW alone (37°C) until a steady state was reached (28 days). Methanogenic diversity was screened using a phylogenetic microarray (AnaeroChip), and positive targets were quantified by real-time PCR. Results revealed high phylogenetic richness, with representatives of three out of the four taxonomic orders found in digesters. Methanosarcina dominated in the starting excreta (>96% of total 16S rRNA gene copies; over 45 times more abundant than any other methanogen) at high acetate (0.21 g liter−1) and ammonia N concentrations (1.3 g liter−1). Codigestion at 37°C induced a 6-fold increase of Methanosarcina numbers, correlated with CH4 production (rPearson = 0.94; P = 0.02). At 55°C, the rise in temperature and H2 partial pressure induced a burst of Methanobacterium, Methanoculleus, Methanothermobacter, and a group of uncultured archaea. The digestion of excreta alone resulted in low but constant biogas production despite certain oscillations in the methanogenic biomass. Unsuccessful digestion of TPOMW alone was attributed to high Cu levels inducing inhibition of methanogenic activity. In conclusion, the versatile Methanosarcina immediately adapted to the shift from excreta to excreta plus TPOMW and was responsible for the stimulated CH4 production at 37°C. Higher temperatures (55°C) fostered methanogenic diversity by promoting some H2 scavengers while yielding the highest CH4 production. Further testing is needed to find out whether there is a link between increased methanogenic diversity and reactor productivity.

[1]  K. Schleifer,et al.  ARB: a software environment for sequence data. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Alfons J. M. Stams,et al.  Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[3]  Heribert Insam,et al.  Microbes at work : from wastes to resources , 2010 .

[4]  L. Raskin,et al.  Quantification of Methanosaeta Species in Anaerobic Bioreactors Using Genus- and Species-Specific Hybridization Probes , 2000, Microbial Ecology.

[5]  Anne-Kristin Kaster,et al.  Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  I. Franke-Whittle,et al.  Microbes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Waste Treatment , 2010 .

[7]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Codigestion of olive oil mill wastewaters with manure, household waste or sewage sludge , 1997 .

[8]  Rudolf Braun,et al.  Recent Developments in Bio-Energy Recovery Through Fermentation , 2010 .

[9]  Lutgarde Raskin,et al.  Microbial population dynamics during start‐up and overload conditions of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and sewage sludge , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  H. Insam,et al.  Mesophilic and thermophilic co-fermentation of cattle excreta and olive mill wastes in pilot anaerobic digesters. , 2010 .

[11]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Quantitative Detection of Microbial Genes by Using DNA Microarrays , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Influence of Environmental Conditions on Methanogenic Compositions in Anaerobic Biogas Reactors , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  I. Franke-Whittle,et al.  Microbes at Work , 2010 .

[14]  C. Martens,et al.  Thermodynamic control on hydrogen concentrations in anoxic sediments , 1998 .

[15]  H. Insam,et al.  Design and testing of real-time PCR primers for the quantification of Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina, Methanothermobacter, and a group of uncultured methanogens. , 2009, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[16]  J. Godon,et al.  16S rDNA characterisation of bacterial and archaeal communities during start-up of anaerobic thermophilic digestion of cattle manure. , 2004, Bioresource Technology.

[17]  L Blackall,et al.  Microbial ecology of the leach bed anaerobic digestion of unsorted municipal solid waste. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  H. Insam,et al.  Design and development of the ANAEROCHIP microarray for investigation of methanogenic communities. , 2009, Journal of microbiological methods.

[19]  D. Boone,et al.  The Order Methanosarcinales , 2006 .

[20]  J. Field,et al.  Toxicity of copper to acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic activities of methanogens and sulfate reducers in anaerobic sludge. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[21]  B. Inanc,et al.  Community Changes During Start-up in Methanogenic Bioreactors Exposed to Increasing Levels of Ammonia , 2005, Environmental technology.

[22]  H. Insam,et al.  Effect of Biowaste Sludge Maturation on the Diversity of Thermophilic Bacteria and Archaea in an Anaerobic Reactor , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  A Roig,et al.  An overview on olive mill wastes and their valorisation methods. , 2006, Waste management.

[24]  B. Demirel,et al.  The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review , 2008 .

[25]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Advances in Microarray-Based Technologies for Soil Microbial Community Analyses , 2006 .

[26]  Kerry S. Smith,et al.  Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen? , 2007, Trends in microbiology.

[27]  L. Raskin,et al.  Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  R. Conrad,et al.  Thermophilic methanogens in rice field soil. , 2001, Environmental microbiology.

[29]  J. M. González,et al.  Performance and microbial communities of a continuous stirred tank anaerobic reactor treating two-phases olive mill solid wastes at low organic loading rates. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[30]  A. Magurran Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[31]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Unravelling Microbial Communities with DNA-Microarrays: Challenges and Future Directions , 2007, Microbial Ecology.

[32]  W. Liesack,et al.  Diversity and Structure of the Methanogenic Community in Anoxic Rice Paddy Soil Microcosms as Examined by Cultivation and Direct 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Retrieval , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  K. Kida,et al.  Effect of dilution rate on structure of a mesophilic acetate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation. , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[34]  W. Sloan,et al.  Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[35]  J. Dolfing,et al.  Thermodynamic constraints on methanogenic crude oil biodegradation , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[36]  Rafael Borja,et al.  A study of anaerobic digestibility of two-phases olive mill solid waste (OMSW) at mesophilic temperature , 2002 .

[37]  Jaai Kim,et al.  Use of real-time PCR for group-specific quantification of aceticlastic methanogens in anaerobic processes: population dynamics and community structures. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  P. Evans,et al.  16S ribosomal DNA-directed PCR primers for ruminal methanogens and identification of methanogens colonising young lambs. , 2004, Anaerobe.

[39]  B. Patel,et al.  Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of methanogenic Archaea. , 2000, Anaerobe.

[40]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Soil , 2006 .

[41]  Harald Meier,et al.  46. ARB: A Software Environment for Sequence Data , 2011 .