The Influence of Surprise on Upset Recovery Performance in Airline Pilots

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to test if performance of airline pilots, in performing an aerodynamic stall recovery procedure, decreases when they are surprised, compared to when they anticipate a stall event. Background: New flight-safety regulations for commercial aviation recommend the introduction of surprise and startle in upset prevention and recovery training. This calls for more evidence on the effects of surprise on pilot performance, as well as methods to effectively induce surprise in training simulators. Method: The study took place in a motion-base simulator with a poststall aerodynamic model. Using a within-subjects design, the recovery performance of 20 pilots was tested in 2 conditions: 1 anticipated condition, and 1 surprise condition. In addition to flight parameters, subjective and physiological data relating to surprise and startle were measured. Results: Pilots had significantly more difficulties with adhering to the recovery procedure in the surprise condition compared to the anticipation condition. The subjective and physiological measures confirmed that the manipulation mainly increased surprise, and to a lesser extent also startle. Conclusion: The results suggest that pilots have more difficulty in managing an upset situation (i.e., an aerodynamic stall) when this situation is presented unexpectedly, underlining that upset prevention and recovery training should include elements of surprise.

[1]  Karel Hurts,et al.  Automation Surprise: Results of a Field Survey of Dutch Pilots , 2017 .

[2]  J. Lagopoulos.  Electrodermal activity , 2007, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[3]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Joris Field,et al.  “Staying ahead of the aircraft ” and Managing Surprise in Modern Airliners , 2013 .

[5]  Jennifer K. Phillips,et al.  A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking , 2007 .

[6]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The anxiety thermometer: a validation study. , 1989, Journal of personality assessment.

[7]  René van Paassen,et al.  Dealing With Unexpected Events on the Flight Deck: A Conceptual Model of Startle and Surprise , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Mikhail Goman,et al.  State-Space Representation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Aircraft at High Angles of Attack , 1994 .

[10]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  W. D. Ledegang,et al.  Stall Recovery in a Centrifuge-Based Flight Simulator With an Extended Aerodynamic Model , 2015 .

[12]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[13]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Sensemaking following surprise in the cockpit—a re-framing problem , 2016, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[14]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. , 2007, Emotion.

[15]  W. Boucsein.  Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[16]  D. Woods,et al.  Automation Surprises , 2001 .

[17]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  The Effectiveness of Airline Pilot Training for Abnormal Events , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Aircraft Loss-of-Control Accident Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Max Mulder,et al.  The Effects of Pictorial Detail on the Timing of the Landing Flare: Results of a Visual Simulation Experiment , 2000 .

[20]  Joris Field,et al.  SUPRA - Enhanced upset recovery simulation , 2012 .

[21]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[22]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[23]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Surprise and Unexpectedness in Flying: Database Reviews and Analyses , 2004 .

[24]  Patrick Stuart Murray,et al.  A Flight Simulator Study of the Impairment Effects of Startle on Pilots During Unexpected Critical Events , 2016 .

[25]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  An Evaluation of Several Stall Models for Commercial Transport Training , 2014 .

[26]  S. Chinn.  A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[28]  David W. Biers,et al.  Unidimensional versus Multidimensional Workload Scales and the Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories , 1997 .

[29]  Patrick Stuart Murray,et al.  Fear-Potentiated Startle: A Review from an Aviation Perspective , 2015 .

[30]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Startle and Surprise on the Flight Deck , 2014 .